> On Jun 8, 2017, at 8:23 AM, Philipp Hachtmann via cctalk
> wrote:
>
>
>
> On 06.06.2017 20:56, Paul Koning via cctalk wrote:
>> Agreed, and packs from the 2311, RP03, RK05 era are washable. In fact, I
>> remember a pack washing machine.
> Hm, hm.
> I successfully
On 06.06.2017 20:56, Paul Koning via cctalk wrote:
Agreed, and packs from the 2311, RP03, RK05 era are washable. In fact, I
remember a pack washing machine.
Hm, hm.
I successfully cleaned many RK05 packs from gooey foam and other
residue, even after a crash. But... I usually use 100%
On 06.06.2017 20:26, Al Kossow via cctalk wrote:
On 6/6/17 6:10 AM, Philipp Hachtmann via cctalk wrote:
And I have cables and lots of spare heads: All submerged since Saturday. I most
probly won't try to recover the packs
If they really are that rare you may want to reconsider.
The cables
On 6/6/17 11:56 AM, Paul Koning wrote:
>
>> On Jun 6, 2017, at 2:26 PM, Al Kossow via cctalk
>> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On 6/6/17 6:10 AM, Philipp Hachtmann via cctalk wrote:
>>
>>> And I have cables and lots of spare heads: All submerged since Saturday. I
>>> most probly
I'm not positive what pack washing machines used. Distilled water seems
plausible, perhaps with some sort of mild cleaner. Keep in mind I'm talking
about packs, no electronics there.
Then again, many electronics are designed to be washed in water (as part of the
manufacturing process).
Did people actually wash disk packs with water or some electronics-friendly
solution?
--
Anders Nelson
+1 (517) 775-6129
www.erogear.com
On Jun 6, 2017 11:56 AM, "Paul Koning via cctalk"
wrote:
> On Jun 6, 2017, at 2:26 PM, Al Kossow via cctalk
> On Jun 6, 2017, at 2:26 PM, Al Kossow via cctalk
> wrote:
>
>
>
> On 6/6/17 6:10 AM, Philipp Hachtmann via cctalk wrote:
>
>> And I have cables and lots of spare heads: All submerged since Saturday. I
>> most probly won't try to recover the packs
>
> If they
On 6/6/17 6:10 AM, Philipp Hachtmann via cctalk wrote:
> And I have cables and lots of spare heads: All submerged since Saturday. I
> most probly won't try to recover the packs
If they really are that rare you may want to reconsider.
I have some submerged packs that look like the one in the auction. Wet
since Saturday :-(
Here's a link to the drive that I'd like to restore some day:
http://www.digitalheritage.de/peripherals/cdc/854/854.htm
I think I have the same :-)
And I have cables and lots of spare heads: All
> On Jun 5, 2017, at 10:33 AM, P Gebhardt via cctalk
> wrote:
>
>> ...
>> The platters can be replaced with ones from the single-platter IBM 2315 (ie.
>> RK05) and use similar head technology which is pretty rugged.
>
> Yes, I kept the disk packs. However, I guess that
Hello Al,
>> The surfaces of the disk packs of type 9871 or 871 that came with it where
>> corroded and are not usable anymore.
>
>Did you keep them?
>
>The platters can be replaced with ones from the single-platter IBM 2315 (ie.
>RK05) and use similar head technology which is pretty rugged.
On 06/04/2017 02:43 PM, jim stephens via cctalk wrote:
> Note as a side story, they had been doing something similar to a
> source control program, so though the above sounds like a fantastic
> amount of software, some times one or two card drawer racks contained
> dozens of revisions of the same
> -Original Message-
> From: cctalk [mailto:cctalk-boun...@classiccmp.org] On Behalf Of jim
> stephens via cctalk
> Sent: 04 June 2017 22:43
> To: General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts
> Subject: Re: Anybody has Control Data (CDC) disk packs for 841 and
> On Jun 4, 2017, at 12:02 PM, Chuck Guzis via cctalk
> wrote:
>
> On 06/04/2017 11:47 AM, Al Kossow via cctalk wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 6/4/17 3:35 AM, ANDY HOLT via cctalk wrote:
>>
>>> I would think it "not too difficult" to build a modern controller
>>
>> The
On 6/4/2017 2:11 PM, Rob Jarratt wrote:
In my case this is not with the intention of running anything, I don't have an
ICL 1905E (!). All I want to do is recover the data on the disk as it may
contain what is possibly the only copy anywhere of an operating system that was
built at
> -Original Message-
> From: cctalk [mailto:cctalk-boun...@classiccmp.org] On Behalf Of jim
> stephens via cctalk
> Sent: 04 June 2017 21:41
> To: Chuck Guzis via cctalk
> Subject: Re: Anybody has Control Data (CDC) disk packs for 841 and 844 disk
> drives to
On 6/4/2017 12:02 PM, Chuck Guzis via cctalk wrote:
It doesn't even have to be poorly stored.
I moved a system with 4 300mb memorex 10 (or so) platter drives eons
ago, which had been running for a year or more. After setup and service
it ran 2 hours before eating one of the drives. That
On 06/04/2017 11:47 AM, Al Kossow via cctalk wrote:
>
>
> On 6/4/17 3:35 AM, ANDY HOLT via cctalk wrote:
>
>> I would think it "not too difficult" to build a modern controller
>
> The electronics isn't the problem. Getting a poorly stored
> electromechanical device to not turn your or any
I am looking for someone who can read an ICL EDS8 disk pack. I am told that it
would have been used in an ICT type 2802/2 drive on an ICL 1905E, but that it
is also compatible with an IBM 2311 disk drive and that it uses a mechanical
assembly based on a CDC 9450. Given the mention of the 2311
> -Original Message-
> From: cctalk [mailto:cctalk-boun...@classiccmp.org] On Behalf Of Al Kossow
> via cctalk
> Sent: 03 June 2017 18:49
> To: cctalk@classiccmp.org
> Subject: Re: Anybody has Control Data (CDC) disk packs for 841 and 844 disk
> drives to spare with?
>
>
>
> On 6/3/17
On 6/3/17 10:21 AM, P Gebhardt via cctalk wrote:
> The surfaces of the disk packs of type 9871 or 871 that came with it where
> corroded and are not usable anymore.
Did you keep them?
The platters can be replaced with ones from the single-platter IBM 2315 (ie.
RK05) and use similar head
Hello everybody,
recently, there was an US epay auction with a CDC 849 disk pack.
http://www.ebay.com/itm/292129988099
This pack is for the early CDC 851/852 disk storage drives and thus not of
interest for me, as the packs I am looking for my 854 drive have a different
amount of sectors
22 matches
Mail list logo