Re: Anyone know where uPD2167 SRAMs appeared?
On 10/09/2018 08:54 PM, Josh Dersch via cctalk wrote: > On Tue, Oct 9, 2018 at 5:14 PM Ethan Dicks via cctalk > wrote: > >> Hi, All, >> >> I asked a version of this question earlier this year. I have not been >> able to find any vintage machines that used these 16Kx1 55ns SRAMs. >> Anyone recognize them? Lots of them for sale on eBay. Probably few >> buyers. One would want to know which systems used them, thus my >> question. The uPD2167(16Kx1) and 2147 (4kx4) rams appeared in 1981, I was at NEC then. They were offered as 65/55/45ns and for the time that was faster than most static and dynamic parts. >> They probably would have been excellent in a DEC MOS memory board but >> I have no evidence they were used thusly. Contemporary DRAMs were >> cheap and 64Kx1 so that's what was in consumer gear. >> >> Anyone? Fast SRAM? Anywhere? >> > The Three Rivers PERQ used 48 of them for microcode store in the 16K CPU, > and on the Z80-based IO Processor. (I suspect the IO Processor didn't need > RAMs quite that fast, but 3RCC probably had a lot of them on hand due to > their use in the main CPU...) > > - Josh Popular use was memory planes for high speed graphics and cache for some minis. At that time and for a good while there were no micros that pushed the speed needs that hard even 12mhz 8086 in the mid 80s. >> There's little point in wiring 8 of them up into a byte vs using a >> 62256 except for speed. 55ns is faster than any 8MHz machine really >> needs (100ns-150ns was typical for those depending on bus >> architecture). I could see these being cache RAM for a minicomputer >> vs primary RAM. >> >> -ethan >> I used them for a fast cull of 10mhz Z80 without wait states. While an 8mhz z80 machine has limited need when you add buffering and propagation delays you do need to be under 100ns for margin. At 10mhz you have to be under 85ns. Also back then the largest byte wide was 2116/6116 (2kx8) and they were fast at maybe 200ns. The 62256 was later and early parts were barely 150ns. Now finding parts that slow is a challenge. The need for external cache for 386 and 486 based machines drove it way down such that 15-25ns static CMOS (mid to late 1990s) became easy to find. Allison
Re: Anyone know where uPD2167 SRAMs appeared?
On Tue, Oct 9, 2018 at 9:07 PM Chuck Guzis via cctalk wrote: > On 10/09/2018 05:13 PM, Ethan Dicks via cctalk wrote: > > > I asked a version of this question earlier this year. I have not been > > able to find any vintage machines that used these 16Kx1 55ns SRAMs. > > Anyone recognize them? > > Same as the Intel 2167, or InMOS 1403, no? The same. > Like most SRAM of the time, kind of power-hungry (180 ma @ 5V is about a watt > per chip) Yep. > I've got a pile of the InMOS variety, scavenged from a Eurobus design of > some sort. I have a pile too and no machines (that I know of) that use them. A bin of PDIP from a former employer and a stack of ceramic parts from a large mixed assortment. If I find out they appeared in a machine I might want someday I'd be inclined to keep them. Otherwise, they go, one way or another. -ethan > --Chuck > > >
Re: Anyone know where uPD2167 SRAMs appeared?
On Tue, Oct 9, 2018 at 5:14 PM Ethan Dicks via cctalk wrote: > > There's little point in wiring 8 of them up into a byte vs using a > 62256 except for speed. 55ns is faster than any 8MHz machine really > needs (100ns-150ns was typical for those depending on bus > architecture). I could see these being cache RAM for a minicomputer > vs primary RAM. Or maybe used as writable microcode control store? Although as x1 parts there would probably need to be a large number of them in parallel for microcode control store. For example the HP 1000 A900 12205 control store option from the early 1980s used the same 16K density and 55ns speed INMOS IMS1420 SRAM chips, but in a 4Kx4 organization, using 12 of them for a 48-bit wide microcode word. That would take up a lot of board space using x1 parts.
Re: Anyone know where uPD2167 SRAMs appeared?
On 10/09/2018 05:13 PM, Ethan Dicks via cctalk wrote: > I asked a version of this question earlier this year. I have not been > able to find any vintage machines that used these 16Kx1 55ns SRAMs. > Anyone recognize them? Lots of them for sale on eBay. Probably few > buyers. One would want to know which systems used them, thus my > question. Same as the Intel 2167, or InMOS 1403, no? Like most SRAM of the time, kind of power-hungry (180 ma @ 5V is about a watt per chip. I've got a pile of the InMOS variety, scavenged from a Eurobus design of some sort. --Chuck
Re: Anyone know where uPD2167 SRAMs appeared?
On Tue, Oct 9, 2018 at 5:14 PM Ethan Dicks via cctalk wrote: > Hi, All, > > I asked a version of this question earlier this year. I have not been > able to find any vintage machines that used these 16Kx1 55ns SRAMs. > Anyone recognize them? Lots of them for sale on eBay. Probably few > buyers. One would want to know which systems used them, thus my > question. > > They probably would have been excellent in a DEC MOS memory board but > I have no evidence they were used thusly. Contemporary DRAMs were > cheap and 64Kx1 so that's what was in consumer gear. > > Anyone? Fast SRAM? Anywhere? > The Three Rivers PERQ used 48 of them for microcode store in the 16K CPU, and on the Z80-based IO Processor. (I suspect the IO Processor didn't need RAMs quite that fast, but 3RCC probably had a lot of them on hand due to their use in the main CPU...) - Josh > > There's little point in wiring 8 of them up into a byte vs using a > 62256 except for speed. 55ns is faster than any 8MHz machine really > needs (100ns-150ns was typical for those depending on bus > architecture). I could see these being cache RAM for a minicomputer > vs primary RAM. > > -ethan >
Anyone know where uPD2167 SRAMs appeared?
Hi, All, I asked a version of this question earlier this year. I have not been able to find any vintage machines that used these 16Kx1 55ns SRAMs. Anyone recognize them? Lots of them for sale on eBay. Probably few buyers. One would want to know which systems used them, thus my question. They probably would have been excellent in a DEC MOS memory board but I have no evidence they were used thusly. Contemporary DRAMs were cheap and 64Kx1 so that's what was in consumer gear. Anyone? Fast SRAM? Anywhere? There's little point in wiring 8 of them up into a byte vs using a 62256 except for speed. 55ns is faster than any 8MHz machine really needs (100ns-150ns was typical for those depending on bus architecture). I could see these being cache RAM for a minicomputer vs primary RAM. -ethan
