Re: If you scroll down to the L9000 there are pictures of the rescue I was
thinking of, which may well be the system you're talking about and even the
lady in question:
>
> http://www.picklesnet.com/burroughs/gallery/bpgltc.htm
Yes!, thanks!
On
- Original Message -
From: "Stan Sieler via cctalk"
To: "General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts"
Sent: Thursday, August 06, 2020 4:07 PM
Subject: Re: Burroughs L-series paper tapes
> >
>> Mike Stein writes:
>> > I remember ther
On 8/6/20 1:07 PM, Stan Sieler via cctalk wrote:
I was tempted...but it was a large machine, so I arranged for it to be
given to the Computer History Museum (where I was, or became (timeline
hazy) a senior docent).
that is https://www.computerhistory.org/collections/catalog/X1742.2001
>
> Mike Stein writes:
> > I remember there was another L9000 rescued in California years ago,
> but maybe that's the one you have now.
>
My consulting company was in Redwood City, CA. Our nextdoor neighbor had a
company leasing new cars. They ran the company on a Burroughs L9000.
About
To:
Sent: Wednesday, August 05, 2020 1:35 PM
Subject: Re: Burroughs L-series paper tapes
> There is a B800 at the RICM, but nothing larger.
>
>
>> On Aug 5, 2020, at 1:00 PM, cctech-requ...@classiccmp.org wrote:
>>
>> Burroughs L-series paper tapes
There is a B800 at the RICM, but nothing larger.
> On Aug 5, 2020, at 1:00 PM, cctech-requ...@classiccmp.org wrote:
>
> Burroughs L-series paper tapes
- Original Message -
From: "Al Kossow via cctech"
To:
Sent: Tuesday, August 04, 2020 12:15 PM
Subject: Re: Burroughs L-series paper tapes
> On 8/3/20 7:25 PM, Mike Stein via cctalk wrote:
>
>> And what about your L9000 (or was it an 8000?) ? Did
What happened to Sellam's machines?
Why are they "likely lost"?
Is this another sad LCM like story?
Thanks
Tom Hunter
On Wed, Aug 5, 2020 at 4:10 AM Al Kossow via cctalk
wrote:
> On 8/4/20 11:14 AM, Alan Frisbie via cctalk wrote:
> > Al Kossow wrote:
> >
> >> On 8/3/20 7:25 PM, Mike Stein via
On 8/4/20 11:14 AM, Alan Frisbie via cctalk wrote:
Al Kossow wrote:
On 8/3/20 7:25 PM, Mike Stein via cctalk wrote:
And what about your L9000 (or was it an 8000?) ? Did it also go to the LCM?
Not many left, alas...
we have an L-9000
Al Kossow wrote:
On 8/3/20 7:25 PM, Mike Stein via cctalk wrote:
And what about your L9000 (or was it an 8000?) ? Did it also go to the LCM?
Not many left, alas...
we have an L-9000
https://www.computerhistory.org/collections/catalog/X1742.2001
Here is another one:
In 2006, Nelson
On 8/3/20 7:25 PM, Mike Stein via cctalk wrote:
And what about your L9000 (or was it an 8000?) ? Did it also go to the LCM?
Not many left, alas...
we have an L-9000
https://www.computerhistory.org/collections/catalog/X1742.2001
- Original Message -
From: "Bob Rosenbloom via cctalk"
To:
Sent: Saturday, August 01, 2020 9:53 PM
Subject: Re: Burroughs L-series paper tapes
> On 8/1/2020 10:07 AM, Al Kossow via cctalk wrote:
>> I've bought a small number of L-series tapes over the years that
- Original Message -
From: "Al Kossow via cctech"
To: "General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts"
Sent: Saturday, August 01, 2020 1:07 PM
Subject: Burroughs L-series paper tapes
> I've bought a small number of L-series tapes over the years that I fi
On 8/1/2020 10:07 AM, Al Kossow via cctalk wrote:
I've bought a small number of L-series tapes over the years that I
finally read yesterday,
mostly pass 1 and 2 of the assembler.
Part numbers look like this. Oddly, they all seem to be wound
backwards. The person-readable
label is at the end,
On 8/1/20 3:04 PM, Mike Stein wrote:
No descriptions? No idea which model L? Would be interesting to see the dumps,
esp. the assembler.
including cctlk, since that is where I posted the message
pass 1 and 2 for the L-4000 and a combined SL5 tape marked "L8/L9"
On 8/1/20 10:07 AM, Al Kossow via cctalk wrote:
I've bought a small number of L-series tapes over the years that I finally read
yesterday,
mostly pass 1 and 2 of the assembler.
finished scanning the labels. they are uploaded now to
http://bitsavers.org/bits/Burroughs/L-Series
I've bought a small number of L-series tapes over the years that I finally read
yesterday,
mostly pass 1 and 2 of the assembler.
Part numbers look like this. Oddly, they all seem to be wound backwards. The
person-readable
label is at the end, which will make it annoying to scan.
1-2101-049-01
17 matches
Mail list logo
