> On Apr 18, 2019, at 7:41 PM, Warner Losh wrote:
>
>
>
>> On Thu, Apr 18, 2019 at 5:11 PM Paul Koning wrote:
>>
>> ...
>> Poor man's hypervisor, I like that.
>>
>> That's reasonably accurate. RSTS/E had "run-time systems", originally the
>> interpreter, support library, and user interf
DSM went to InterSystems Corp. during their spree of buying up every MUMPS
implementation vendor they could get their hands on. They got DataTree (DTM),
Micronetics (MSM), and DSM. They already had ISM. They merged ISM and features
from the others into OpenM, which evolved into Caché, their curr
On Thu, Apr 18, 2019 at 5:11 PM Paul Koning wrote:
>
>
> > On Apr 18, 2019, at 3:06 PM, Warner Losh wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Apr 18, 2019 at 12:41 PM Dan Veeneman via cctalk <
> cctalk@classiccmp.org> wrote:
> > On 4/18/2019 2:27 PM, Paul Koning via cctalk wrote:
> > > my memory is that DSM-11 is
> On Apr 18, 2019, at 3:06 PM, Warner Losh wrote:
>
> On Thu, Apr 18, 2019 at 12:41 PM Dan Veeneman via cctalk
> wrote:
> On 4/18/2019 2:27 PM, Paul Koning via cctalk wrote:
> > my memory is that DSM-11 is an operating system all its own, not just a
> > language processor running on top of
On 4/18/19 2:41 PM, Dan Veeneman wrote:
> On 4/18/2019 2:27 PM, Paul Koning via cctalk wrote:
>> my memory is that DSM-11 is an operating system all its own, not just a
>> language processor running on top of a standard OS like RSTS.
>
> In the late 1980s and early 1990s, we used DSM running on V
On Thu, Apr 18, 2019 at 12:41 PM Dan Veeneman via cctalk <
cctalk@classiccmp.org> wrote:
> On 4/18/2019 2:27 PM, Paul Koning via cctalk wrote:
> > my memory is that DSM-11 is an operating system all its own, not just a
> language processor running on top of a standard OS like RSTS.
>
> In the late
On 4/18/2019 2:27 PM, Paul Koning via cctalk wrote:
> my memory is that DSM-11 is an operating system all its own, not just a
> language processor running on top of a standard OS like RSTS.
In the late 1980s and early 1990s, we used DSM running on VMS 4.7 for a
nationwide (United States) mortgage
> On Apr 18, 2019, at 1:56 PM, Bill Gunshannon via cctalk
> wrote:
>
>
> Does anyone know what the current status of this might be? I am
> fairly certain Mentec didn't get this and I am not sure anyone
> did. Did it merely die when everyone thought Mumps was on the
> down hill slide? Was i
Does anyone know what the current status of this might be? I am
fairly certain Mentec didn't get this and I am not sure anyone
did. Did it merely die when everyone thought Mumps was on the
down hill slide? Was it ever really a DEC product or was it
something DEC picked up along the way after Mas
