Re: Looking for Limited Function Board

2019-02-06 Thread Anders Sandahl via cctalk
Hi,

I have looked into my PDP-8/a computers now. The small one have the
limited function board that you want. That is the machine that should be
identical to yours.

In my big PDP-8a/420 I have the same board as you have "have.jpg" but in
another revision (no IDC header connector, just the DIL connector).

The big machine is a core memory machine. I had a quick look at the
schematics, they are not compatible.

/Anders

> Hi Paul
>
> I have put pictures of the boards here:
>
> http://pdp8.se/slask/LFB
>
> have.jpg is the board I have and want.jpg is the one
> I'm looking for.
>
> The identifying numbers are in aproximately the same
> place. But you can clearly see that the "want" board
> is much simplified and if I interpret the
> documentation correctly they are not compatible.
>
> I'm happy to be proven wrong, maybe I should just try
> it.
>
> /P
>
>
> On Tue, Feb 05, 2019 at 07:54:39PM -0600, Paul Anderson via cctalk wrote:
>> Hi Pontus,
>>
>> I looked at my limited function front panels, and they were 54-11507s. I
>> have not looked at any prints. Where did you find the 54-11165 number?
>> Could it be for a Q-bus system?
>>
>> The 50-X is the etched PCB. DEC usually added a 1 to that number to
>> make it complete board.
>>
>> Thanks, Paul
>>
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Feb 4, 2019 at 9:41 PM Paul Anderson  wrote:
>>
>> > I have a few of the limited function and programmers panels. I do not
>> > recall either of them being dependent on particular backplane. I'll
>> try to
>> > pull a few a few later and check the part number on them.
>> >
>> > Remember, a 54-X number can become a 70-X with the addition of
>> a
>> > cable or something simple.
>> >
>> > Paul
>> >
>> > On Mon, Feb 4, 2019 at 12:51 PM Anders Sandahl via cctech <
>> > cct...@classiccmp.org> wrote:
>> >
>> >> > Date: Sun, 3 Feb 2019 22:22:42 +0100
>> >> > From: Pontus Pihlgren 
>> >> > To: "General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts"
>> >> >   
>> >> > Subject: Looking for Limited Function Board
>> >> > Message-ID: <20190203212242.gf24...@update.uu.se>
>> >> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
>> >> >
>> >> > Hi
>> >> >
>> >> > I'm restoring a PDP-8/a with the help of some
>> >> > friends. The CPU is now passing the MAINDECs I've
>> >> > thrown at it. The memory is a modern semiconductor
>> >> > board my friend Anders Sandahl made.
>> >> >
>> >> > This machine is pieced together from several others
>> >> > and the limited function panel I got does not match
>> >> > the backplane I have.
>> >> >
>> >> > My theory is the DEC simplified the design of the
>> >> > boardto cut costs and simpler design is not
>> >> > compatible. Mine is labeled (on the PCB):
>> >> >
>> >> > "LIMITED FUNCTION BD.
>> >> > 5411507
>> >> > 5011506C-P2"
>> >> >
>> >> > And the one I need is:
>> >> >
>> >> > "LIMITED FUNCTION
>> >> > 5411165
>> >> > 5011167"
>> >> >
>> >> > However, the picture I have of the other is not so
>> >> > good. I may have read the numbera wrong.
>> >> >
>> >> > I would very much like to buy one to finish this
>> >> > project.
>> >> >
>> >> > /P
>> >>
>> >> Får du inget napp så ritar jag upp ett kort till dig, det borde gå
>> att
>> >> flytta över brytarna från det du har. Lite synd att scrappa ett
>> >> originalkort bara, men är man försiktigt så man inte tar sönder det
>> så går
>> >> det ju att återställa...
>> >>
>> >> /A
>> >>
>> >>
>




Re: Looking for Limited Function Board

2019-02-06 Thread Pontus Pihlgren via cctalk
Hi Paul

I have put pictures of the boards here:

http://pdp8.se/slask/LFB

have.jpg is the board I have and want.jpg is the one 
I'm looking for.

The identifying numbers are in aproximately the same 
place. But you can clearly see that the "want" board 
is much simplified and if I interpret the 
documentation correctly they are not compatible.

I'm happy to be proven wrong, maybe I should just try 
it.

/P


On Tue, Feb 05, 2019 at 07:54:39PM -0600, Paul Anderson via cctalk wrote:
> Hi Pontus,
> 
> I looked at my limited function front panels, and they were 54-11507s. I
> have not looked at any prints. Where did you find the 54-11165 number?
> Could it be for a Q-bus system?
> 
> The 50-X is the etched PCB. DEC usually added a 1 to that number to
> make it complete board.
> 
> Thanks, Paul
> 
> 
> 
> On Mon, Feb 4, 2019 at 9:41 PM Paul Anderson  wrote:
> 
> > I have a few of the limited function and programmers panels. I do not
> > recall either of them being dependent on particular backplane. I'll try to
> > pull a few a few later and check the part number on them.
> >
> > Remember, a 54-X number can become a 70-X with the addition of a
> > cable or something simple.
> >
> > Paul
> >
> > On Mon, Feb 4, 2019 at 12:51 PM Anders Sandahl via cctech <
> > cct...@classiccmp.org> wrote:
> >
> >> > Date: Sun, 3 Feb 2019 22:22:42 +0100
> >> > From: Pontus Pihlgren 
> >> > To: "General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts"
> >> >   
> >> > Subject: Looking for Limited Function Board
> >> > Message-ID: <20190203212242.gf24...@update.uu.se>
> >> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
> >> >
> >> > Hi
> >> >
> >> > I'm restoring a PDP-8/a with the help of some
> >> > friends. The CPU is now passing the MAINDECs I've
> >> > thrown at it. The memory is a modern semiconductor
> >> > board my friend Anders Sandahl made.
> >> >
> >> > This machine is pieced together from several others
> >> > and the limited function panel I got does not match
> >> > the backplane I have.
> >> >
> >> > My theory is the DEC simplified the design of the
> >> > boardto cut costs and simpler design is not
> >> > compatible. Mine is labeled (on the PCB):
> >> >
> >> > "LIMITED FUNCTION BD.
> >> > 5411507
> >> > 5011506C-P2"
> >> >
> >> > And the one I need is:
> >> >
> >> > "LIMITED FUNCTION
> >> > 5411165
> >> > 5011167"
> >> >
> >> > However, the picture I have of the other is not so
> >> > good. I may have read the numbera wrong.
> >> >
> >> > I would very much like to buy one to finish this
> >> > project.
> >> >
> >> > /P
> >>
> >> Får du inget napp så ritar jag upp ett kort till dig, det borde gå att
> >> flytta över brytarna från det du har. Lite synd att scrappa ett
> >> originalkort bara, men är man försiktigt så man inte tar sönder det så går
> >> det ju att återställa...
> >>
> >> /A
> >>
> >>


Re: Looking for Limited Function Board

2019-02-05 Thread Paul Anderson via cctalk
Hi Pontus,

I looked at my limited function front panels, and they were 54-11507s. I
have not looked at any prints. Where did you find the 54-11165 number?
Could it be for a Q-bus system?

The 50-X is the etched PCB. DEC usually added a 1 to that number to
make it complete board.

Thanks, Paul



On Mon, Feb 4, 2019 at 9:41 PM Paul Anderson  wrote:

> I have a few of the limited function and programmers panels. I do not
> recall either of them being dependent on particular backplane. I'll try to
> pull a few a few later and check the part number on them.
>
> Remember, a 54-X number can become a 70-X with the addition of a
> cable or something simple.
>
> Paul
>
> On Mon, Feb 4, 2019 at 12:51 PM Anders Sandahl via cctech <
> cct...@classiccmp.org> wrote:
>
>> > Date: Sun, 3 Feb 2019 22:22:42 +0100
>> > From: Pontus Pihlgren 
>> > To: "General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts"
>> >   
>> > Subject: Looking for Limited Function Board
>> > Message-ID: <20190203212242.gf24...@update.uu.se>
>> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
>> >
>> > Hi
>> >
>> > I'm restoring a PDP-8/a with the help of some
>> > friends. The CPU is now passing the MAINDECs I've
>> > thrown at it. The memory is a modern semiconductor
>> > board my friend Anders Sandahl made.
>> >
>> > This machine is pieced together from several others
>> > and the limited function panel I got does not match
>> > the backplane I have.
>> >
>> > My theory is the DEC simplified the design of the
>> > boardto cut costs and simpler design is not
>> > compatible. Mine is labeled (on the PCB):
>> >
>> > "LIMITED FUNCTION BD.
>> > 5411507
>> > 5011506C-P2"
>> >
>> > And the one I need is:
>> >
>> > "LIMITED FUNCTION
>> > 5411165
>> > 5011167"
>> >
>> > However, the picture I have of the other is not so
>> > good. I may have read the numbera wrong.
>> >
>> > I would very much like to buy one to finish this
>> > project.
>> >
>> > /P
>>
>> Får du inget napp så ritar jag upp ett kort till dig, det borde gå att
>> flytta över brytarna från det du har. Lite synd att scrappa ett
>> originalkort bara, men är man försiktigt så man inte tar sönder det så går
>> det ju att återställa...
>>
>> /A
>>
>>


Re: Looking for Limited Function Board

2019-02-04 Thread Paul Anderson via cctalk
I have a few of the limited function and programmers panels. I do not
recall either of them being dependent on particular backplane. I'll try to
pull a few a few later and check the part number on them.

Remember, a 54-X number can become a 70-X with the addition of a
cable or something simple.

Paul

On Mon, Feb 4, 2019 at 12:51 PM Anders Sandahl via cctech <
cct...@classiccmp.org> wrote:

> > Date: Sun, 3 Feb 2019 22:22:42 +0100
> > From: Pontus Pihlgren 
> > To: "General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts"
> >   
> > Subject: Looking for Limited Function Board
> > Message-ID: <20190203212242.gf24...@update.uu.se>
> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
> >
> > Hi
> >
> > I'm restoring a PDP-8/a with the help of some
> > friends. The CPU is now passing the MAINDECs I've
> > thrown at it. The memory is a modern semiconductor
> > board my friend Anders Sandahl made.
> >
> > This machine is pieced together from several others
> > and the limited function panel I got does not match
> > the backplane I have.
> >
> > My theory is the DEC simplified the design of the
> > boardto cut costs and simpler design is not
> > compatible. Mine is labeled (on the PCB):
> >
> > "LIMITED FUNCTION BD.
> > 5411507
> > 5011506C-P2"
> >
> > And the one I need is:
> >
> > "LIMITED FUNCTION
> > 5411165
> > 5011167"
> >
> > However, the picture I have of the other is not so
> > good. I may have read the numbera wrong.
> >
> > I would very much like to buy one to finish this
> > project.
> >
> > /P
>
> Får du inget napp så ritar jag upp ett kort till dig, det borde gå att
> flytta över brytarna från det du har. Lite synd att scrappa ett
> originalkort bara, men är man försiktigt så man inte tar sönder det så går
> det ju att återställa...
>
> /A
>
>


Re: Looking for Limited Function Board

2019-02-04 Thread Anders Sandahl via cctalk
> Date: Sun, 3 Feb 2019 22:22:42 +0100
> From: Pontus Pihlgren 
> To: "General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts"
>   
> Subject: Looking for Limited Function Board
> Message-ID: <20190203212242.gf24...@update.uu.se>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
>
> Hi
>
> I'm restoring a PDP-8/a with the help of some
> friends. The CPU is now passing the MAINDECs I've
> thrown at it. The memory is a modern semiconductor
> board my friend Anders Sandahl made.
>
> This machine is pieced together from several others
> and the limited function panel I got does not match
> the backplane I have.
>
> My theory is the DEC simplified the design of the
> boardto cut costs and simpler design is not
> compatible. Mine is labeled (on the PCB):
>
> "LIMITED FUNCTION BD.
> 5411507
> 5011506C-P2"
>
> And the one I need is:
>
> "LIMITED FUNCTION
> 5411165
> 5011167"
>
> However, the picture I have of the other is not so
> good. I may have read the numbera wrong.
>
> I would very much like to buy one to finish this
> project.
>
> /P

Får du inget napp så ritar jag upp ett kort till dig, det borde gå att
flytta över brytarna från det du har. Lite synd att scrappa ett
originalkort bara, men är man försiktigt så man inte tar sönder det så går
det ju att återställa...

/A



Looking for Limited Function Board

2019-02-03 Thread Pontus Pihlgren via cctalk
Hi

I'm restoring a PDP-8/a with the help of some 
friends. The CPU is now passing the MAINDECs I've 
thrown at it. The memory is a modern semiconductor 
board my friend Anders Sandahl made.

This machine is pieced together from several others 
and the limited function panel I got does not match 
the backplane I have.

My theory is the DEC simplified the design of the 
boardto cut costs and simpler design is not 
compatible. Mine is labeled (on the PCB):

"LIMITED FUNCTION BD.
5411507
5011506C-P2"

And the one I need is:

"LIMITED FUNCTION
5411165
5011167"

However, the picture I have of the other is not so 
good. I may have read the numbera wrong.

I would very much like to buy one to finish this 
project.

/P