Re: Looking for a home for most issues of BYTE Magazine

2018-12-15 Thread John Klos via cctalk
Thank you all for all of the interest. The first person who wrote me isn't 
far away at all and will give it a good home, so I'm going to go with him.


While I'm fetching those, I'm going to make a list of other older hardware 
for which I'd like to find homes, so I'll post about that, and possibly 
about other magazines, in a week or so.


Thanks!
John


Re: Looking for a home for most issues of BYTE Magazine

2018-12-15 Thread Zane Healy via cctalk
> On Dec 14, 2018, at 11:54 PM, Randy Dawson  wrote:
> 
> Zane, your comments are appreciated.
> 
> I have paid for subscriptions to ebooks that cost ~10 a month, and they are 
> OK for text, but when a schematic comes up, it sucks (scribd) you cant zoom 
> or increase the resolution.
> I also follow you on your purchase experience with out of print and search.  
> I am dumb or spend hours on search, then find it and think everybody already 
> knows but me.  Most recent all the Dr. Dobbs and Byte, Pop Sci online I only 
> found recently.
> I suppose there is money to be made if you can check in your morals.  I see 
> all this (now) public domain type stuff (including Al's bitsavers manuals) 
> for sale on ebay DVDs.
> The unwashed will be relieved from their dollars.
> 
> Randy

Now you’re touching on something that really ticks me off, and I’ve seen it 
done using Google Books, and others (the book I bought before I knew what was 
going on was done using a Google Books scan).  That’s the growing market on 
“Print On Demand” books done using these scans.  Many of these books are still 
covered under the original copywrite.   And of course, there are the folks 
selling the CD’s and DVD’s on eBay.


The people offering “reproductions" for sale in these fashions harm the 
community as a whole.

It also makes it rather challenging to find original copies for sale, as you 
have to wade through so many of these offerings.

Zane




Re: Looking for a home for most issues of BYTE Magazine

2018-12-15 Thread ED SHARPE via cctalk
these  may already  be scanned and  out there.

 
we  have   hardcopy  and   what a  joy to  sit  and   just  look  though in  a  
big  arm chair
 
If  you have  space   always  great to have  them in  prit  as  the images  
for  displays  etc   are  better     than what usually is  out   compressed on 
the  net.  I  have  found though internet  archive    has   some  jpeg2000 I 
think it is     pages   for many things  that  are  pretty  sharp.
 
 
In a message dated 12/14/2018 11:50:36 AM US Mountain Standard Time, 
cctalk@classiccmp.org writes:

 
On 12/14/18 11:16 AM, John Klos via cctalk wrote:

> Hi, all,

Hi John,

> Does anyone know of any person or organization within a reasonable 
> distance from southern California who might take these magazines and 
> preserve them, instead of just selling them on eBay?

Have you contacted the Internet Archive and / or BitSavers? I think one 
or both of them will take things like this and scan them for 
preservation and to share with other people.



-- 
Grant. . . .
unix || die


Re: Looking for a home for most issues of BYTE Magazine

2018-12-15 Thread Randy Dawson via cctalk
Kilobaud is also up on the Internet archive.
https://archive.org/details/kilobaudmagazine
Kilobaud Microcomputing Magazine - Internet 
Archive<https://archive.org/details/kilobaudmagazine>
Kilobaud Microcomputing was a magazine dedicated to the computer homebrew 
hobbyists from the end of the 1970s until the beginning of the 1980s. Wayne 
Green, the Publisher/Editor of kilobaud, had been the publisher of BYTE 
magazine, (another influential microcomputer magazine of the time) where he...
archive.org



From: cctalk  on behalf of ben via cctalk 

Sent: Saturday, December 15, 2018 12:27 AM
To: cctalk@classiccmp.org
Subject: Re: Looking for a home for most issues of BYTE Magazine

On 12/15/2018 12:54 AM, Randy Dawson via cctalk wrote:
> Zane, your comments are appreciated.
>
> I have paid for subscriptions to ebooks that cost ~10 a month, and
> they are OK for text, but when a schematic comes up, it sucks
> (scribd) you cant zoom or increase the resolution. I also follow you
> on your purchase experience with out of print and search. I am dumb
> or spend hours on search, then find it and think everybody already
> knows but me.  Most recent all the Dr. Dobbs and Byte, Pop Sci online
> I only found recently.

That still leaves Kilobaud  scans.

> I suppose there is money to be made if you can check in your morals.
> I see all this (now) public domain type stuff (including Al's
> bitsavers manuals) for sale on ebay DVDs. The unwashed will be
> relieved from their dollars.

I better shower, so I can clean and EVIL.

> Randy 

Ben.




Re: Looking for a home for most issues of BYTE Magazine

2018-12-15 Thread ben via cctalk

On 12/15/2018 12:54 AM, Randy Dawson via cctalk wrote:

Zane, your comments are appreciated.

I have paid for subscriptions to ebooks that cost ~10 a month, and
they are OK for text, but when a schematic comes up, it sucks
(scribd) you cant zoom or increase the resolution. I also follow you
on your purchase experience with out of print and search. I am dumb
or spend hours on search, then find it and think everybody already
knows but me.  Most recent all the Dr. Dobbs and Byte, Pop Sci online
I only found recently.


That still leaves Kilobaud  scans.


I suppose there is money to be made if you can check in your morals.
I see all this (now) public domain type stuff (including Al's
bitsavers manuals) for sale on ebay DVDs. The unwashed will be
relieved from their dollars.


I better shower, so I can clean and EVIL.


Randy 


Ben.




Re: Looking for a home for most issues of BYTE Magazine

2018-12-14 Thread Randy Dawson via cctalk
Zane, your comments are appreciated.

I have paid for subscriptions to ebooks that cost ~10 a month, and they are OK 
for text, but when a schematic comes up, it sucks (scribd) you cant zoom or 
increase the resolution.
I also follow you on your purchase experience with out of print and search.
I am dumb or spend hours on search, then find it and think everybody already 
knows but me.  Most recent all the Dr. Dobbs and Byte, Pop Sci online I only 
found recently.
I suppose there is money to be made if you can check in your morals.  I see all 
this (now) public domain type stuff (including Al's bitsavers manuals) for sale 
on ebay DVDs.
The unwashed will be relieved from their dollars.

Randy

From: cctalk  on behalf of Zane Healy via cctalk 

Sent: Friday, December 14, 2018 5:40 PM
To: Fred Cisin; General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts
Subject: Re: Looking for a home for most issues of BYTE Magazine


> On Dec 14, 2018, at 1:22 PM, Fred Cisin via cctalk  
> wrote:
>
>>> There exist some people who DISCARD materials once they have been scanned.
>>> Some people object to calling that "preservation".
>
> On Fri, 14 Dec 2018, Zane Healy wrote:
>> Aren’t these the same people that scan at such poor quality that only the 
>> text is “usable”, and illustrations are largely unusable?
>
> I wouldn't be surprised if there is substantial overlap between the two 
> groups.  Although one would hope that those who think that digital copies are 
> adequate would care about making them adequate.
> Admittedly, there are SOME materials where scans need only be adequate for 
> OCR. Certainly Murphy would hold that the least available ones would be those 
> that most need quality scanning.

And scan in colour, where it’s important!

>> Case in point, I’m trying to track down a 150 year old book, by one of my 
>> favorite photography authors, it’s on Google books, but the illustrations, 
>> which are vital to understanding what the author is talking about, are 
>> largely useless.
>
> Hmmm.  150 year old photography book would be just after civil war.
> My preference for photography books isusually from about 60 to 80 years ago, 
> when publishers could do a good job of B&W plates, and the technology of 35mm 
> was coming along.   (Morgan and Lester, etc.)
> Occasionally, I'll drive to Carmel to look at Ansel Adams prints at the 
> Weston Gallery - "megapixel" just doesn't cut it!

It’s less a technical book, and more a philosophical book on composition, and 
uses works of a well known 19th century painter in most examples.  As for books 
in the time frame you’re mentioning, don’t forget the “Ilford Manual of 
Photography”, the examples for troubleshooting are actually easy to use 
compared to the newer “Manual of Photography”, even though they’re mostly the 
same photo’s.  Right now I’m fighting with some processing issues with 8x10 and 
11x14 film.  Though if I was driving to Carmel, it wouldn’t be to look at Ansel 
Adams prints, it would be to look at Edward Weston’s.  His work for Walt 
Whitman’s “Leaves of Grass”, drives much of my efforts.

> Is there any way to penetrate the Google infrastructure, to track down who 
> scanned the book, and where it now is?

I think I’ve finally tracked down a copy.  Part of the hold-up has been 
ensuring that I don’t buy an older edition.  There were at least 4 editions.  
It’s also *not* a cheap book.  Oddly enough, some of the techniques used in the 
book, seem better suited to Adobe Photoshop. :-)  H.P. Robinson was a man 
before his time!

Zane





Re: Looking for a home for most issues of BYTE Magazine

2018-12-14 Thread Zane Healy via cctalk


> On Dec 14, 2018, at 1:22 PM, Fred Cisin via cctalk  
> wrote:
> 
>>> There exist some people who DISCARD materials once they have been scanned.
>>> Some people object to calling that "preservation".
> 
> On Fri, 14 Dec 2018, Zane Healy wrote:
>> Aren’t these the same people that scan at such poor quality that only the 
>> text is “usable”, and illustrations are largely unusable?
> 
> I wouldn't be surprised if there is substantial overlap between the two 
> groups.  Although one would hope that those who think that digital copies are 
> adequate would care about making them adequate.
> Admittedly, there are SOME materials where scans need only be adequate for 
> OCR. Certainly Murphy would hold that the least available ones would be those 
> that most need quality scanning.

And scan in colour, where it’s important!

>> Case in point, I’m trying to track down a 150 year old book, by one of my 
>> favorite photography authors, it’s on Google books, but the illustrations, 
>> which are vital to understanding what the author is talking about, are 
>> largely useless.
> 
> Hmmm.  150 year old photography book would be just after civil war.
> My preference for photography books isusually from about 60 to 80 years ago, 
> when publishers could do a good job of B&W plates, and the technology of 35mm 
> was coming along.   (Morgan and Lester, etc.)
> Occasionally, I'll drive to Carmel to look at Ansel Adams prints at the 
> Weston Gallery - "megapixel" just doesn't cut it!

It’s less a technical book, and more a philosophical book on composition, and 
uses works of a well known 19th century painter in most examples.  As for books 
in the time frame you’re mentioning, don’t forget the “Ilford Manual of 
Photography”, the examples for troubleshooting are actually easy to use 
compared to the newer “Manual of Photography”, even though they’re mostly the 
same photo’s.  Right now I’m fighting with some processing issues with 8x10 and 
11x14 film.  Though if I was driving to Carmel, it wouldn’t be to look at Ansel 
Adams prints, it would be to look at Edward Weston’s.  His work for Walt 
Whitman’s “Leaves of Grass”, drives much of my efforts.

> Is there any way to penetrate the Google infrastructure, to track down who 
> scanned the book, and where it now is?

I think I’ve finally tracked down a copy.  Part of the hold-up has been 
ensuring that I don’t buy an older edition.  There were at least 4 editions.  
It’s also *not* a cheap book.  Oddly enough, some of the techniques used in the 
book, seem better suited to Adobe Photoshop. :-)  H.P. Robinson was a man 
before his time!

Zane





Re: Looking for a home for most issues of BYTE Magazine

2018-12-14 Thread Fred Cisin via cctalk

There exist some people who DISCARD materials once they have been scanned.
Some people object to calling that "preservation".


On Fri, 14 Dec 2018, Zane Healy wrote:
Aren’t these the same people that scan at such poor quality that only 
the text is “usable”, and illustrations are largely unusable?


I wouldn't be surprised if there is substantial overlap between the two 
groups.  Although one would hope that those who think that digital 
copies are adequate would care about making them adequate.
Admittedly, there are SOME materials where scans need only be adequate for 
OCR. 
Certainly Murphy would hold that the least available ones would be those 
that most need quality scanning.


Case in point, I’m trying to track down a 150 year old book, by one of 
my favorite photography authors, it’s on Google books, but the 
illustrations, which are vital to understanding what the author is 
talking about, are largely useless.


Hmmm.  150 year old photography book would be just after civil war.
My preference for photography books isusually from about 60 to 80 years 
ago, when publishers could do a good job of B&W plates, and the 
technology of 35mm was coming along.   (Morgan and Lester, etc.)
Occasionally, I'll drive to Carmel to look at Ansel Adams prints at the 
Weston Gallery - "megapixel" just doesn't cut it!


Is there any way to penetrate the Google infrastructure, to track down who 
scanned the book, and where it now is?


--
Grumpy Ol' Fred ci...@xenosoft.com


Re: Looking for a home for most issues of BYTE Magazine

2018-12-14 Thread Zane Healy via cctalk


> On Dec 14, 2018, at 12:10 PM, Fred Cisin via cctalk  
> wrote:
> 
> There exist some people who DISCARD materials once they have been scanned.
> Some people object to calling that "preservation".

Aren’t these the same people that scan at such poor quality that only the text 
is “usable”, and illustrations are largely unusable?

Case in point, I’m trying to track down a 150 year old book, by one of my 
favorite photography authors, it’s on Google books, but the illustrations, 
which are vital to understanding what the author is talking about, are largely 
useless.

Zane





Re: Looking for a home for most issues of BYTE Magazine

2018-12-14 Thread Fred Cisin via cctalk
Does anyone know of any person or organization within a reasonable distance 
from southern California who might take these magazines and preserve them, 
instead of just selling them on eBay?


On Fri, 14 Dec 2018, Grant Taylor via cctalk wrote:
Have you contacted the Internet Archive and / or BitSavers?  I think one or 
both of them will take things like this and scan them for preservation and to 
share with other people.


Q1: Which issues of BYTE have not been scanned yet??

Q2: What do Internet Archive and Bitsavers do with materials after 
scanning?  (or duplicates? or incoming materials that they have aready 
scanned?)

Maybe they could sell them on eBay to fund their activities, . . .


There exist some people who DISCARD materials once they have been scanned.
Some people object to calling that "preservation".


Re: Looking for a home for most issues of BYTE Magazine

2018-12-14 Thread Randy Dawson via cctalk
Hi John,

If you have not gotten any takers, I will step up.
I am in Los Angeles (Thousand Oaks).

I see most if not all is online at internet achive an here:

https://www.americanradiohistory.com/Byte_Magazine.htm

I would rather have the physical magazine.  Let me know what others you want to 
get rid of (Kilobaud?)

Randy
BYTE MAGAZINE: Early computer 
publication<https://www.americanradiohistory.com/Byte_Magazine.htm>
Byte magazine was an early microcomputer magazine, influential in the late 
1970s and throughout the 1980s because of its wide-ranging editorial coverage. 
Byte started in 1975, shortly after the first personal computers appeared as 
kits which were advertised in the back of electronics magazines.
www.americanradiohistory.com



From: cctalk  on behalf of John Klos via cctalk 

Sent: Friday, December 14, 2018 10:16 AM
To: cctalk@classiccmp.org
Subject: Looking for a home for most issues of BYTE Magazine

Hi, all,

I have a collection of most of BYTE Magazine from the beginning through
about 1985. Instead of selling it on eBay, I'd rather find a home for it
where people can enjoy it. I also have a small collection of other
computer magazines from the late 1970s and early 1980s which I'd like to
include.

Does anyone know of any person or organization within a reasonable
distance from southern California who might take these magazines and
preserve them, instead of just selling them on eBay?

Thanks!
John
--
I don't know which scares me more - that people adhere to the idea of an
omnipotent being powerful enough to create the universe, but whose
supposedly most cherished creation is a race modeled after himself which
can't stop hurting and killing each other, or the idea that those same
people cannot or will not consider the possibility that the universe is
random and unfeeling, and it's up to us to create order and beauty out of
chaos and entropy.


Re: Looking for a home for most issues of BYTE Magazine

2018-12-14 Thread Grant Taylor via cctalk

On 12/14/18 11:16 AM, John Klos via cctalk wrote:

Hi, all,


Hi John,

Does anyone know of any person or organization within a reasonable 
distance from southern California who might take these magazines and 
preserve them, instead of just selling them on eBay?


Have you contacted the Internet Archive and / or BitSavers?  I think one 
or both of them will take things like this and scan them for 
preservation and to share with other people.




--
Grant. . . .
unix || die


Looking for a home for most issues of BYTE Magazine

2018-12-14 Thread John Klos via cctalk

Hi, all,

I have a collection of most of BYTE Magazine from the beginning through 
about 1985. Instead of selling it on eBay, I'd rather find a home for it 
where people can enjoy it. I also have a small collection of other 
computer magazines from the late 1970s and early 1980s which I'd like to 
include.


Does anyone know of any person or organization within a reasonable 
distance from southern California who might take these magazines and 
preserve them, instead of just selling them on eBay?


Thanks!
John
--
I don't know which scares me more - that people adhere to the idea of an
omnipotent being powerful enough to create the universe, but whose
supposedly most cherished creation is a race modeled after himself which
can't stop hurting and killing each other, or the idea that those same
people cannot or will not consider the possibility that the universe is
random and unfeeling, and it's up to us to create order and beauty out of
chaos and entropy.