Re: Manx entry update

> From: Jim Stephens > I don't know how to contact the maintainer for manx There was discussion recently about that, and I did manage (with help from someone here who provided his email - thanks muchly!) to reach him. We were discussing how I could help update things, but a hur

Manx entry update

I looked for an image or record of the PDP8/L reference card, and one of the entries which showed up was for manx. I don't know how to contact the maintainer for manx but figure if someone can comment here it would be better than me ratholing and still not figuring it out. Anyway I found

Re: Current MANX location

ons 2019-08-21 klockan 18:30 +0100 skrev Antonio Carlini via cctalk: > On 21/08/2019 15:46, Noel Chiappa via cctalk wrote: > > I have mixed reactions to it. I use it some, often to see if > > something is > > online at all. (If I buy a manual, I usually check, to see if I > > need to > > scan it,

Re: KE11-A craze (Was: Current MANX location)

On Fri, Aug 23, 2019 at 2:34 PM Noel Chiappa via cctalk wrote: > >> Speaking of KE11-A's, does anyone know what's behind the bidding wars > >> on recent eBay KE11-A component board listings, e.g.: > >> > >> https://www.ebay.com/itm/372685033144 > > Must be two such people,

Re: KE11-A craze (Was: Current MANX location)

> From: Ethan Dicks >> Speaking of KE11-A's, does anyone know what's behind the bidding wars >> on recent eBay KE11-A component board listings, e.g.: >> >> https://www.ebay.com/itm/372685033144 > Perhaps someone has a broken KE11-A Must be two such people, though - I

Re: KE11-A craze (Was: Current MANX location)

nt Set > http://manx-docs.org/details.php/1,9358 >Speaking of KE11-A's, does anyone know what's behind the bidding wars on >recent eBay >KE11-A >component board listings, e.g.: https://www.ebay.com/itm/372685033144 > AFAIK, the boards (a complete set is an M7210, M7211, M827, and t

Re: KE11-A craze (Was: Current MANX location)

On Thu, Aug 22, 2019 at 9:26 AM Noel Chiappa via cctalk wrote: > > KE11-A Field Maintenance Print Set > > http://manx-docs.org/details.php/1,9358 > > Speaking of KE11-A's, does anyone know what's behind the bidding wars on > recent eBay KE11-A component board listin

KE11-A craze (Was: Current MANX location)

> KE11-A Field Maintenance Print Set > http://manx-docs.org/details.php/1,9358 Speaking of KE11-A's, does anyone know what's behind the bidding wars on recent eBay KE11-A component board listings, e.g.: https://www.ebay.com/itm/372685033144 AFAIK, the boards (a comple

KE11-B manuals (Was: Current MANX location)

> KE11-B Field Maintenance Print Set > http://manx-docs.org/details.php/1,9361 > the KE11-B I also just found (IIRC, on one of the collections they list > as indexed). Oh, speaking of KE11-B's, does anyone have either the Technical or User's manual for it (I cou

Re: Current MANX location

On 21/08/2019 15:46, Noel Chiappa via cctalk wrote: I have mixed reactions to it. I use it some, often to see if something is online at all. (If I buy a manual, I usually check, to see if I need to scan it, and get it to Al. Have a backlog at the moment, sigh.) The problem is that there are

RE: Current MANX location

> They try and list all known DEC manuals and print sets Ooops, my mistake; the coverage is much wider than that (they default to DEC). On the home page, there's a pull-down menu labelled "Company", which lists over 100. > From: "Paul Birkel" >> the KE11-B I also just found

RE: Current MANX location

-Original Message- From: cctalk [mailto:cctalk-boun...@classiccmp.org] On Behalf Of Noel Chiappa via cctalk Sent: Wednesday, August 21, 2019 10:46 AM To: cctalk@classiccmp.org Cc: j...@mercury.lcs.mit.edu Subject: Re: Current MANX location ... KE11-B Field Maintenance Print Set http

Re: Current MANX location

> On Aug 21, 2019, at 7:46 AM, Noel Chiappa via cctalk > wrote: > > So I'd use it as a 'first stop', but don't depend on the negatives to > be accurate - do a Web seach if it pans out. In the case of the ALL-IN-1 documentation, it was sort of a “Last Stop”. I’ve found some at archive.org,

Re: Current MANX location

> On Aug 20, 2019, at 9:28 PM, John H. Reinhardt > wrote: >>> Anyway... What version of the ADA manuals are you looking for? VSI has >>> some for an Alpha Version 3.5 that they scraped off the HP site before they >>> disappeared. I have some older VAX ConDists that might have ADA >>>

Re: Current MANX location

es'; i.e. entries where they say 'none known online', but which are available. E.g. KE11-A Field Maintenance Print Set http://manx-docs.org/details.php/1,9358 KE11-B Field Maintenance Print Set http://manx-docs.org/details.php/1,9361 Both listed as not online, but they are: the KE11-A is on

RE: Current MANX location

> -Original Message- > From: cctalk On Behalf Of John H. Reinhardt > via cctalk > Sent: 21 August 2019 05:29 > To: General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts ; > Zane Healy > Subject: Re: Current MANX location > > On 8/20/2019 11:26 PM, John H.

Re: Current MANX location

link to Manx; probably ought to fix it to go to the new location.    Noel Stupid question.  What is MANX?  I’d thought that it was an alternate source of manuals.  To my disappointment, the manuals that turned up when I searched it, apparently don’t exist online anywhere. Zane It's kind

Re: Current MANX location

This? Yes; thanks! I don't know it didn't show up in my Web searches - I tried a number of different things, no luck. Also,http://manx.classiccmp.org/ (which is the medium-old URL I had for it) redirects to something that has no working link to Manx; probably ought to fix it to go to the new

Re: Current MANX location

This? >>> Yes; thanks! >>> >>> I don't know it didn't show up in my Web searches - I tried a number of >>> different things, no luck. >>> >>> >>> Also, http://manx.classiccmp.org/ (which is the medium-old URL I had for it) >>>

Re: Current MANX location

is the medium-old URL I had for it) redirects to something that has no working link to Manx; probably ought to fix it to go to the new location. Noel Stupid question. What is MANX? I’d thought that it was an alternate source of manuals. To my disappointment, the manuals that turned up when

Re: Current MANX location

anx.classiccmp.org/ (which is the medium-old URL I had for it) > redirects to something that has no working link to Manx; probably ought to fix > it to go to the new location. > > Noel Stupid question. What is MANX? I’d thought that it was an alternate source of manuals. To m

Re: Current MANX location

> From: Glen Slick > This? Yes; thanks! I don't know it didn't show up in my Web searches - I tried a number of different things, no luck. Also, http://manx.classiccmp.org/ (which is the medium-old URL I had for it) redirects to something that has no working link to Manx; pr

Re: Current MANX location

This? http://manx-docs.org/ On Mon, Aug 19, 2019, 12:05 PM Noel Chiappa via cctalk < cctalk@classiccmp.org> wrote: > Wasn't MANX supposed to be coming back up after moving? Did that never > happen? > >Noel >

Current MANX location

Wasn't MANX supposed to be coming back up after moving? Did that never happen? Noel

RE: Manx?

> -Original Message- > From: cctalk [mailto:cctalk-boun...@classiccmp.org] On Behalf Of Noel > Chiappa via cctalk > Sent: 01 October 2017 21:11 > To: cctalk@classiccmp.org > Cc: j...@mercury.lcs.mit.edu > Subject: Re: Manx? > > > From: Rob Jarrat

Re: Manx?

On 10/1/2017 1:11 PM, Noel Chiappa via cctalk wrote: > From: Rob Jarratt > I have just tried accessing Manx at manx-docs.org, but it seems to have > disappeared. Anyone know what has happened to it? It moved. Now at: https://vt100.net/manx/ Noe

Re: Manx?

> From: Rob Jarratt > I have just tried accessing Manx at manx-docs.org, but it seems to have > disappeared. Anyone know what has happened to it? It moved. Now at: https://vt100.net/manx/ Noel

Manx?

I have just tried accessing Manx at manx-docs.org, but it seems to have disappeared. Anyone know what has happened to it? Regards Rob

Re: Manx

On Tue, Sep 06, 2016 at 08:01:17AM -0500, Jay West wrote: > > I did my best. > I had no idea, thanks for all the extra work you put in for us. And a thanks to the maintainer of Manx for working with on it! It's a great resource. /P

Re: Manx

. US Mountain Standard Time, pon...@update.uu.se writes: On Tue, Sep 06, 2016 at 08:01:17AM -0500, Jay West wrote: > > I did my best. > I had no idea, thanks for all the extra work you put in for us. And a thanks to the maintainer of Manx for working with on it! It's a great

Re: Manx

: It was written --- > but Manx seems to be in the process of being relocated > Hasn't Manx been in that state for ages? /P - manx.classiccmp.org terminals.classiccmp.org computergraphicsmuseum.com/net/org The owner of those three sit

Re: Manx

http://rtk.mirrors.pdp-11.ru/ Am 06.09.2016 um 17:43 schrieb Cameron Kaiser : >> The owner of those three sites has the unfortunate honor of being the only >> person ever asked to leave the free hosting at classiccmp.org. > > I realize this is likely confidential, but it's

Re: Manx

> The owner of those three sites has the unfortunate honor of being the only > person ever asked to leave the free hosting at classiccmp.org. I realize this is likely confidential, but it's aching to be asked: what on earth did he do?? -- personal:

RE: Manx

Rob wrote... --- Can we have the backup of the contents somewhere downloadable? If not the code, which may belong to the owner, then at least the actual manuals? What other options might there be to ensure that the content is not lost? --- No, I can't make the contents downloadable. They

RE: Manx

> -Original Message- > From: Jay West [mailto:jw...@classiccmp.org] > Sent: 06 September 2016 14:01 > To: 'General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts' > <cctalk@classiccmp.org>; r...@jarratt.me.uk > Subject: RE:

RE: Manx

It was written --- > but Manx seems to be in the process of being relocated > Hasn't Manx been in that state for ages? /P - manx.classiccmp.org terminals.classiccmp.org computergraphicsmuseum.com/net/org The owner of those

Re: Manx [Was: Re: DEC Pro 350/380 Memory Cards - Interchangeability?]

Topic and Off-Topic Posts >> <cctalk@classiccmp.org> >> Cc: 'Paul Koning' <paulkon...@comcast.net> >> Subject: Manx [Was: Re: DEC Pro 350/380 Memory Cards - >> Interchangeability?] >> >> On Mon, Aug 29, 2016 at 05:38:02PM +0100, Rob Jarratt wrote: >>

RE: Manx [Was: Re: DEC Pro 350/380 Memory Cards - Interchangeability?]

> -Original Message- > From: Pontus Pihlgren [mailto:pon...@update.uu.se] > Sent: 06 September 2016 11:49 > To: r...@jarratt.me.uk; General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts > <cctalk@classiccmp.org> > Cc: 'Paul Koning' <paulkon...@comcast.net> >

Manx [Was: Re: DEC Pro 350/380 Memory Cards - Interchangeability?]

On Mon, Aug 29, 2016 at 05:38:02PM +0100, Rob Jarratt wrote: > > but Manx seems to be in the process of being relocated > Hasn't Manx been in that state for ages? /P