On Wed, Apr 21, 2021 at 5:19 AM Bill Degnan via cctalk <
cctalk@classiccmp.org> wrote:
> It is not too hard to imagine a professional programmer who took a copy of
> Dartmouth BASIC and adapted it for this flavor of BASIC, but I personally
> dont have any reference docs about it or proof.
>
[...]
On Wed, 21 Apr 2021, Brent Hilpert wrote:
It's not clear what you're looking for:
1. A possible predecessor/origin for the source code or design of the MINCAL
interpreter,
2. or, earlier BASIC implementations that had the language features you
mention.
Well, both with the focus on 1.
I'm
On 2021-Apr-21, at 1:49 AM, Christian Corti via cctalk wrote:
> I'm trying to find out if the BASIC dialect that was available for the MINCAL
> computers (aboutn 1971) was something derived from another "system" or
> whether it was an own dialect.
>
> Some characteristic instructions that I
On Wed, 21 Apr 2021, it was written
If there are FORTRAN-esque commands added to the core Dartmouth version I
would search for another instance prior to MINICAL where this was done.
Back then BASIC flavors and adaptations were becomming common so it may
simply be MINICAL BASIC would have been
> On Apr 21, 2021, at 6:19 AM, Bill Degnan via cctalk
> wrote:
>
> It is not too hard to imagine a professional programmer who took a copy of
> Dartmouth BASIC and adapted it for this flavor of BASIC, but I personally
> dont have any reference docs about it or proof.
I’m not sure I would
It is not too hard to imagine a professional programmer who took a copy of
Dartmouth BASIC and adapted it for this flavor of BASIC, but I personally
dont have any reference docs about it or proof.
If there are FORTRAN-esque commands added to the core Dartmouth version I
would search for another
Hi,
I'm trying to find out if the BASIC dialect that was available for the
MINCAL computers (aboutn 1971) was something derived from another "system"
or whether it was an own dialect.
Some characteristic instructions that I can't find somewhere else are:
- Formatted output with PRINT FOR()