On Thu, 28 May 2015, Jules Richardson wrote:
On 05/27/2015 04:18 PM, Chuck Guzis wrote:
I did a little checking today--I compared a male 163-type receptacle
with a C14 receptacle. The mounting ear holes appear to have the same
spacing; the C14 is about 3/4 thick, where the 163 (metal shell)
On Tue, 26 May 2015, Chuck Guzis wrote:
On 05/26/2015 08:28 PM, Brent Hilpert wrote:
Like wulfman and chuck and as described on my page, I replace the
chassis inlet whenever I can, although occasionally it's not possible
due to proximity of other chassis elements as the IEC inlet is slightly
At 10:25 PM 5/26/2015, Jules Richardson wrote:
... is there a classiccmp-type list equivalent for old test gear?
Yahoogroups.com hosts a number of them. I sub lists there for GR, HP, and Tek,
as well as the TestEquipTrader list for buying and selling vintage equipment.
Dale H. Cook, GR / HP
On 05/26/2015 09:27 PM, Kyle Owen wrote:
Yes, there does appear to be a name for them: the 163 connector.
http://www.cs.ubc.ca/~hilpert/e/powerConn/index.html
Thanks - that's the critter!
My modified calculator cable is probably the Japanese calculator type,
although it seems to work OK
Right now, I'm cursing the guy who thought that the cloverleaf or
mouseketeer power receptacle was a good idea. I'm sitting here
looking at an HP ScanJet wondering if it would be worth the effort to
replace it.
Fer heaven's sake, what was wrong with the IEC connector?
If you mean the
On May 26, 2015 8:28 PM, Brent Hilpert hilp...@cs.ubc.ca wrote:
On 2015-May-26, at 7:27 PM, Kyle Owen wrote:
Yes, there does appear to be a name for them: the 163 connector.
http://www.cs.ubc.ca/~hilpert/e/powerConn/index.html
Big thanks to our own Brent Hilpert for the great
