[cctalk] Re: Mail veracity signing

I got it, and vaxen.net is a private "virtualdomain" server running on a private email server. None of that is necessarily complicated but it's not your average Google Services mail domain. Thanks for the work you're putting in! Doc On 4/20/23 19:32, Dennis Boone via cctalk wrote: Folks,

[cctalk] Re: Mail veracity signing

Got to me Apr 21, 2023. On Thu, Apr 20, 2023 at 10:03 PM Tom Hunter via cctalk < cctalk@classiccmp.org> wrote: > It got all the way Down Under. 8-) > > > On Fri, 21 Apr 2023, 8:56 am Zane Healy via cctalk, > > wrote: > > > That was rather my thought, it made it through. > > > > Zane > > > > >

[cctalk] Re: Mail veracity signing

It got all the way Down Under. 8-) On Fri, 21 Apr 2023, 8:56 am Zane Healy via cctalk, wrote: > That was rather my thought, it made it through. > > Zane > > > > > > On Apr 20, 2023, at 5:38 PM, Paul Koning via cctalk < > cctalk@classiccmp.org> wrote: > > > > Your note got through, that's a

[cctalk] Re: Mail veracity signing

That was rather my thought, it made it through. Zane > On Apr 20, 2023, at 5:38 PM, Paul Koning via cctalk > wrote: > > Your note got through, that's a promising start. Let's hope this change > helps. > > paul > >> On Apr 20, 2023, at 8:32 PM, Dennis Boone via cctalk >> wrote:

[cctalk] Re: Mail veracity signing

Your note got through, that's a promising start. Let's hope this change helps. paul > On Apr 20, 2023, at 8:32 PM, Dennis Boone via cctalk > wrote: > > Folks, > > A heads up that I've turned on some mail veracity signing functionality > in Mailman. One could hope it would just

Re: Mail

On 10/7/20 8:45 AM, Tomas By via cctalk wrote: the cc:Mail PO would need to periodically (ie constantly) check for new mail from the provider, and collect it. /Something/ needs to periodically check for new mail from the provider. I don't think that it needs to necessarily be the cc:Mail PO.

Re: Mail

Hi again, I think sending out is already covered, the problematic bit is that for this to work in the modern "ecosystem", the cc:Mail PO would need to periodically (ie constantly) check for new mail from the provider, and collect it. There are probably other things I am missing also. /Tomas

RE: Mail

..@gmail.com > Cc: 'General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts' > > Subject: Re: Mail > > Hi, > > Yes, I did find documents on VIM, but there is also the API to the PO to > consider. > > In the Lotus cc:Mail developer kit, do you think there is enough stuff to p

Re: Mail

Hi, Yes, I did find documents on VIM, but there is also the API to the PO to consider. In the Lotus cc:Mail developer kit, do you think there is enough stuff to put together a "reverse client" -- an app that gets mail from a modern email provider using POP/IMAP/whatever it is? /Tomas On Wed,

RE: Mail

Thomas, This API connection for cc:mail is Lotus VIM, vendor independent mail except only lotus every implemented it. Somewhere I had some code that would interface to VIM but I have no idea where it is now. I think it listened for a local SMTP connection and then sent it via cc:mail. I think the

Re: mail on spool as G-d intended was Re: Future of cctalk/cctech

Sometimes I'll log into alembic and read my mail with BABYL. On 6/18/2020 6:03 PM, Eric Korpela via cctalk wrote: I used to use netcat, but now I just watch an oscilloscope. On Wed, Jun 17, 2020 at 1:41 PM Cameron Kaiser via cctalk < cctalk@classiccmp.org> wrote: I read this list on PINE,

Re: mail on spool as G-d intended was Re: Future of cctalk/cctech

On 18/06/2020 23:03, Eric Korpela via cctalk wrote: I used to use netcat, but now I just watch an oscilloscope. Reminds me of a cartoon in a HiFi mag several years ago. Enthusiast talking to friend in front of dual 'scopes, "Why listen to it when I can see it's perfect?" -- Pete Pete

Re: mail on spool as G-d intended was Re: Future of cctalk/cctech

I used to use netcat, but now I just watch an oscilloscope. On Wed, Jun 17, 2020 at 1:41 PM Cameron Kaiser via cctalk < cctalk@classiccmp.org> wrote: > > > I read this list on PINE, on a shell account at my ISP. > > > > Barbarian! At least upgrade to Alpine. (That's what I use.) :D > >

Re: mail on spool as G-d intended was Re: Future of cctalk/cctech

On 6/18/2020 6:33 AM, Jan-Benedict Glaw via cctalk wrote: Indeed. I get quite a lot of emails and mutt allows me to properly fight back. err Mutt bites back. I use whats free. Ben.

Re: mail on spool as G-d intended was Re: Future of cctalk/cctech

On Wed, 2020-06-17 16:44:26 -0400, Diane Bruce via cctalk wrote: > On Wed, Jun 17, 2020 at 01:41:39PM -0700, Cameron Kaiser via cctalk wrote: > > > > I read this list on PINE, on a shell account at my ISP. > > > > > > Barbarian! At least upgrade to Alpine. (That's what I use.) :D > > > >

Re: mail on spool as G-d intended was Re: Future of cctalk/cctech

> On Jun 17, 2020, at 3:46 PM, Diane Bruce via cctalk > wrote: > > On Wed, Jun 17, 2020 at 01:41:39PM -0700, Cameron Kaiser via cctalk wrote: I read this list on PINE, on a shell account at my ISP. >>> >>> Barbarian! At least upgrade to Alpine. (That's what I use.) :D >> >>

Re: mail on spool as G-d intended was Re: Future of cctalk/cctech

> On Jun 17, 2020, at 3:43 PM, Cameron Kaiser via cctalk > wrote: > >  >> >>> I read this list on PINE, on a shell account at my ISP. >> >> Barbarian! At least upgrade to Alpine. (That's what I use.) :D > > Philistines, all of you. I use a hacked version of Elm. And what’s wrong with

Re: mail on spool as G-d intended was Re: Future of cctalk/cctech

> > > > > I read this list on PINE, on a shell account at my ISP. > > > > > > > > Barbarian! At least upgrade to Alpine. (That's what I use.) :D > > > > > > Philistines, all of you. I use a hacked version of Elm. > > > > mutt! > > `less`, out of system spool. tail -f $MAIL But seriously,

Re: mail on spool as G-d intended was Re: Future of cctalk/cctech

On Wed, Jun 17, 2020 at 04:44:26PM -0400, Diane Bruce via cctalk wrote: > mutt! +1

Re: mail on spool as G-d intended was Re: Future of cctalk/cctech

> > > > I read this list on PINE, on a shell account at my ISP. > > > Barbarian! At least upgrade to Alpine. (That's what I use.) :D > > Philistines, all of you. I use a hacked version of Elm. > mutt! `less`, out of system spool. De

Re: mail on spool as G-d intended was Re: Future of cctalk/cctech

On Wed, Jun 17, 2020 at 01:41:39PM -0700, Cameron Kaiser via cctalk wrote: > > > I read this list on PINE, on a shell account at my ISP. > > > > Barbarian! At least upgrade to Alpine. (That's what I use.) :D > > Philistines, all of you. I use a hacked version of Elm. mutt! > -- >

Re: mail by old path?

I'm suddenly receiving cctalk mails again as well. What's going on? Unsubbed months ago. On Sun, Jan 19, 2020, 11:54 PM crufta cat via cctalk wrote: > OK so I got tons of duplicate mails and also spam and unsubed the > old address. That both fixed the spam and the duplicate mails. > > Today I

Re: mail hosting

On Thu, Dec 10, 2015 at 2:53 PM, Al Kossow wrote: > On 12/10/15 8:47 AM, et...@757.org wrote: > > Self hosted mail systems for the win. >> >> > Sadly, I'm seeing more and more organizations abandoning hosting their own > mail > servers (and mailing lists) because it has