Re: PDF PDF Which is right and which is ... Was Re: PDP-11/24 CPU later version

well I save the tiff because that's what archivists do generally I end up using the jpeg to make picture from. or post to net! In a message dated 2/19/2017 4:25:48 P.M. US Mountain Standard Time, t...@telegraphics.com.au writes: On 2017-02-19 3:50 PM, couryho...@aol.com

Re: PDF PDF Which is right and which is ... Was Re: PDP-11/24 CPU later version

On 2017-02-19 3:44 PM, Noel Chiappa wrote: > From: Toby Thain > Often the source material is a multipage TIFF from the scanner or other > processing step. Multiple single-page TIFFs, in my case. Tiffcp and tiffsplit go between these, so I don't bother making a distinction... I

Re: PDF PDF Which is right and which is ... Was Re: PDP-11/24 CPU later version

On 2017-02-19 3:50 PM, couryho...@aol.com wrote: When we scan stuff at SMECC it is saved in the following 3 formats for each item scanned. PDF with ocr background TIFF JPEG and if containing a lot of text a TXT file as well. Kind of a shotgun approach... but should stand

Re: PDF PDF Which is right and which is ... Was Re: PDP-11/24 CPU later version

When we scan stuff at SMECC it is saved in the following 3 formats for each item scanned. PDF with ocr background TIFF JPEG and if containing a lot of text a TXT file as well. Kind of a shotgun approach... but should stand test of time? Ed# _www.smecc.org_

Re: PDF PDF Which is right and which is ... Was Re: PDP-11/24 CPU later version

> From: Toby Thain > Often the source material is a multipage TIFF from the scanner or other > processing step. Multiple single-page TIFFs, in my case. > So relevant tools are things like tiff2pdf (tiffutils) But also JPEG's, for pages where the B+W scanning I use (with fax

Re: PDF PDF Which is right and which is ... Was Re: PDP-11/24 CPU later version

In a message dated 2/19/2017 8:06:50 A.M. US Mountain Standard Time, mo...@rodents-montreal.org writes: > - PDF/A is [...] > Those are all good archival properties! However, it's also R/O. Maybe if you stick to Adobe's tools. As demonstrated by this thread, it's entirely possible to

Re: PDF PDF Which is right and which is ... Was Re: PDP-11/24 CPU later version

al Message - From: Paul Birkel To: 'General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts' Sent: Sunday, February 19, 2017 9:40 AM Subject: RE: PDF PDF Which is right and which is ... Was Re: PDP-11/24 CPU later version -Original Message- From: cctalk [mailto:cctalk-boun...@clas

Re: PDF PDF Which is right and which is ... Was Re: PDP-11/24 CPU later version

> - PDF/A is [...] > Those are all good archival properties! However, it's also R/O. Maybe if you stick to Adobe's tools. As demonstrated by this thread, it's entirely possible to modify such files, even if the currently-easy ways to do that involve a trip through a completely different

RE: PDP-11/24 CPU later version

-Original Message- From: cctalk [mailto:cctalk-boun...@classiccmp.org] On Behalf Of Bob Rosenbloom Sent: Saturday, February 18, 2017 1:37 PM To: General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts Subject: Re: PDP-11/24 CPU later version On 2/18/2017 10:29 AM, Paul Birkel wrote

Re: PDF PDF Which is right and which is ... Was Re: PDP-11/24 CPU later version

PDP-11/24 CPU later version -Original Message- From: cctalk [mailto:cctalk-boun...@classiccmp.org] On Behalf Of Chuck Guzis Sent: Saturday, February 18, 2017 4:04 PM To: General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts Subject: Re: PDF PDF Which is right and which is ... Was

RE: PDF PDF Which is right and which is ... Was Re: PDP-11/24 CPU later version

-Original Message- From: cctalk [mailto:cctalk-boun...@classiccmp.org] On Behalf Of Chuck Guzis Sent: Saturday, February 18, 2017 4:04 PM To: General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts Subject: Re: PDF PDF Which is right and which is ... Was Re: PDP-11/24 CPU later version On 02/18

Re: PDP-11/24 CPU later version

> From: Al Kossow > PDF-A Sorry, what's the issue with PDF/A? Since it's supposedly the 'archival' version, that's what I asked for; I wanted to maximize the lifetime of these things. What version of PDF should I be asking for? (I'm not doing the PDF'ing. The person who is is using

Re: PDF PDF Which is right and which is ... Was Re: PDP-11/24 CPU later version

On 02/18/2017 11:24 AM, couryho...@aol.com wrote: > > Adobe claims " PDF/A – the ISO standard for long-term archiving" > > -I am confused about all the versions etc.. > -which are good which are bad? > -are there good programs for opening hesitant to open pdf file? > - what is a

PDF PDF Which is right and which is ... Was Re: PDP-11/24 CPU later version

classiccmp.org] On Behalf Of Al Kossow >> Sent: Saturday, February 18, 2017 12:50 PM >> To: cctalk@classiccmp.org >> Subject: Re: PDP-11/24 CPU later version >> >> PDF-A >> >> which is the reason it's not on bitsavers > Thank you Al. It's not j

Re: PDP-11/24 CPU later version

On 2/18/2017 10:29 AM, Paul Birkel wrote: -Original Message- From: cctalk [mailto:cctalk-boun...@classiccmp.org] On Behalf Of Bob Rosenbloom Sent: Saturday, February 18, 2017 1:24 PM To: General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts Subject: Re: PDP-11/24 CPU later version On 2/18

RE: PDP-11/24 CPU later version

-Original Message- From: cctalk [mailto:cctalk-boun...@classiccmp.org] On Behalf Of Bob Rosenbloom Sent: Saturday, February 18, 2017 1:24 PM To: General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts Subject: Re: PDP-11/24 CPU later version On 2/18/2017 10:04 AM, Paul Birkel wrote

Re: PDP-11/24 CPU later version

On 2/18/2017 10:04 AM, Paul Birkel wrote: -Original Message- From: cctalk [mailto:cctalk-boun...@classiccmp.org] On Behalf Of Al Kossow Sent: Saturday, February 18, 2017 12:50 PM To: cctalk@classiccmp.org Subject: Re: PDP-11/24 CPU later version PDF-A which is the reason it's

RE: PDP-11/24 CPU later version

>-Original Message- >From: cctalk [mailto:cctalk-boun...@classiccmp.org] On Behalf Of Al Kossow >Sent: Saturday, February 18, 2017 12:50 PM >To: cctalk@classiccmp.org >Subject: Re: PDP-11/24 CPU later version > >PDF-A > >which is the reason it's not on bit

Re: PDP-11/24 CPU later version

PDF-A which is the reason it's not on bitsavers On 2/18/17 9:48 AM, Toby Thain wrote: > On 2017-02-18 12:44 PM, Paul Birkel wrote: >> Thanks for scanning this! No sign that Al has done-his-bit :-<. >> In the meantime is it possible to get an unlocked copy that I can OCR so >> that it's

Re: PDP-11/24 CPU later version

On 2017-02-18 12:44 PM, Paul Birkel wrote: Thanks for scanning this! No sign that Al has done-his-bit :-<. In the meantime is it possible to get an unlocked copy that I can OCR so that it's searchable? Unlocked?!?!?!?! Sounds like yet another reason to publish multipage TIFF instead of or

RE: PDP-11/24 CPU later version

Thanks for scanning this! No sign that Al has done-his-bit :-<. In the meantime is it possible to get an unlocked copy that I can OCR so that it's searchable? Should I infer that you purchased that $399 load of DEC modules? I debated, what with the J11 processor, but no FP-coprocessor and no

Re: PDP-11/24 CPU later version

The M7133 is etch D or earlier. The M7133-YA is rev E or later. I'll put it on my look for list. On Tue, Feb 7, 2017 at 4:41 PM, Noel Chiappa wrote: > So I was recently provided (thanks!) with a copy of the later rev of the > PDP-11/24 Tech Manual (EK-11024-TM-003),