Re: fix? Repair? or leave alone? http://rcade.camden.rutgers.edu/2020symposium.html
opps sorry yes it is I. In a message dated 9/27/2019 9:23:05 AM US Mountain Standard Time, cctalk@classiccmp.org writes: On 2019-Sep-27, at 6:47 AM, Paul Koning via cctalk wrote: > I make it a habit to assume that every email which contains just a link but > no explanation is a scam with a forged sender address. > > Ed, if this is actually from you and actually real, and you want people to > look at it, you need to say what the link is. > >> On Sep 27, 2019, at 3:10 AM, ED SHARPE via cctalk >> wrote: >> >> http://rcade.camden.rutgers.edu/2020symposium.html "... explored these processes of repair and has focused on their non-linear temporalities." "Repair does not necessarily focus solely on “the reproduction of social and material order,” but also opens up space for the “creative, inventive and innovative work that happens in the process of fixing, across human and non-human bodies." "... offering us a way to historicize and contextualize the work of repair and maintenance. That means avoiding the romanticization of repair while also recognizing “traditions of women's work, domestic and reproductive labor, and all acts of preservation, formal and informal.”" Don't waste your time, unless you're going for some entertainment in watching ridiculous people.
RE: fix? Repair? or leave alone? http://rcade.camden.rutgers.edu/2020symposium.html
Al wrote Welcome to the world of "Digital Humanities" scholarship. Agreed, that link was feel-good gibberish. *facepalm*
Re: fix? Repair? or leave alone? http://rcade.camden.rutgers.edu/2020symposium.html
Welcome to the world of "Digital Humanities" scholarship. On 9/27/19 11:23 AM, allison via cctalk wrote: The scam is eating your time which is worth something with nothing in reward. Lets call it 5 minutes you will never get back. Allison
Re: fix? Repair? or leave alone? http://rcade.camden.rutgers.edu/2020symposium.html
> On Sep 27, 2019, at 11:23 AM, allison via cctalk > wrote: > > This topic has gotten far more words and attention than the poorly > written mental spew that pretends to be intellectual. If I were > grading their work it would be a D- and a fail is less significant. > > The scam is eating your time which is worth something with nothing in > reward. Lets call it 5 minutes you will never get back. > > Allison Thanks Allison, you saved me from being curious! Zane
Re: fix? Repair? or leave alone? http://rcade.camden.rutgers.edu/2020symposium.html
On 9/27/19 2:07 PM, Chuck Guzis via cctalk wrote: > On 9/27/19 9:22 AM, Brent Hilpert via cctalk wrote: >> On 2019-Sep-27, at 6:47 AM, Paul Koning via cctalk wrote: >>> I make it a habit to assume that every email which contains just a >>> link but no explanation is a scam with a forged sender address. >>> >>> Ed, if this is actually from you and actually real, and you want >>> people to look at it, you need to say what the link is. >>> On Sep 27, 2019, at 3:10 AM, ED SHARPE via cctalk wrote: http://rcade.camden.rutgers.edu/2020symposium.html >> >> >> "... explored these processes of repair and has focused on their >> non-linear temporalities." >> >> "Repair does not necessarily focus solely on “the reproduction of >> social and material order,” but also opens up space for the >> “creative, inventive and innovative work that happens in the process >> of fixing, across human and non-human bodies." >> >> "... offering us a way to historicize and contextualize the work of >> repair and maintenance. That means avoiding the romanticization of >> repair while also recognizing “traditions of women's work, domestic >> and reproductive labor, and all acts of preservation, formal and >> informal.”" >> >> >> Don't waste your time, unless you're going for some entertainment in >> watching ridiculous people. > > My reaction also--bunch of word salad devoid of meaningful information > that reads like someone's attempt at a dissertation. > > --Chuck > This topic has gotten far more words and attention than the poorly written mental spew that pretends to be intellectual. If I were grading their work it would be a D- and a fail is less significant. The scam is eating your time which is worth something with nothing in reward. Lets call it 5 minutes you will never get back. Allison
Re: fix? Repair? or leave alone? http://rcade.camden.rutgers.edu/2020symposium.html
On 9/27/19 9:22 AM, Brent Hilpert via cctalk wrote: > On 2019-Sep-27, at 6:47 AM, Paul Koning via cctalk wrote: >> I make it a habit to assume that every email which contains just a >> link but no explanation is a scam with a forged sender address. >> >> Ed, if this is actually from you and actually real, and you want >> people to look at it, you need to say what the link is. >> >>> On Sep 27, 2019, at 3:10 AM, ED SHARPE via cctalk >>> wrote: >>> >>> http://rcade.camden.rutgers.edu/2020symposium.html > > > "... explored these processes of repair and has focused on their > non-linear temporalities." > > "Repair does not necessarily focus solely on “the reproduction of > social and material order,” but also opens up space for the > “creative, inventive and innovative work that happens in the process > of fixing, across human and non-human bodies." > > "... offering us a way to historicize and contextualize the work of > repair and maintenance. That means avoiding the romanticization of > repair while also recognizing “traditions of women's work, domestic > and reproductive labor, and all acts of preservation, formal and > informal.”" > > > Don't waste your time, unless you're going for some entertainment in > watching ridiculous people. My reaction also--bunch of word salad devoid of meaningful information that reads like someone's attempt at a dissertation. --Chuck
Re: fix? Repair? or leave alone? http://rcade.camden.rutgers.edu/2020symposium.html
On 2019-Sep-27, at 6:47 AM, Paul Koning via cctalk wrote: > I make it a habit to assume that every email which contains just a link but > no explanation is a scam with a forged sender address. > > Ed, if this is actually from you and actually real, and you want people to > look at it, you need to say what the link is. > >> On Sep 27, 2019, at 3:10 AM, ED SHARPE via cctalk >> wrote: >> >> http://rcade.camden.rutgers.edu/2020symposium.html "... explored these processes of repair and has focused on their non-linear temporalities." "Repair does not necessarily focus solely on “the reproduction of social and material order,” but also opens up space for the “creative, inventive and innovative work that happens in the process of fixing, across human and non-human bodies." "... offering us a way to historicize and contextualize the work of repair and maintenance. That means avoiding the romanticization of repair while also recognizing “traditions of women's work, domestic and reproductive labor, and all acts of preservation, formal and informal.”" Don't waste your time, unless you're going for some entertainment in watching ridiculous people.
Re: fix? Repair? or leave alone? http://rcade.camden.rutgers.edu/2020symposium.html
I make it a habit to assume that every email which contains just a link but no explanation is a scam with a forged sender address. Ed, if this is actually from you and actually real, and you want people to look at it, you need to say what the link is. paul > On Sep 27, 2019, at 3:10 AM, ED SHARPE via cctalk > wrote: > > http://rcade.camden.rutgers.edu/2020symposium.html >
