Re: Raised Floors

2019-05-25 Thread Adrian Stoness via cctalk
>
> acid water hah i work around ph 2.38 water liming it during the summer.
> insane how fast it will eat steel out
>


Re: Raised Floors

2019-05-25 Thread Stefan Skoglund via cctalk
fre 2019-05-24 klockan 23:38 -0700 skrev Chuck Guzis via cctalk:
> On 5/24/19 9:12 PM, Carlos E Murillo-Sanchez via cctalk wrote:
> 
> > Sulfuric acid is hard to wash off; the amount that made it to the
> > room
> > must have been pretty small, otherwise people couldn't be allowed
> > in. 
> > And, if it was bad enough to corrode boards, imagine what that
> > would do
> > to your lungs and all mucous membranes in your body...
> 
> In my limited experience, there's nothing much worse than
> concentrated
> hydrochloric acid. A contain of the stuff inadvertently left open
> will
> soon corrode anything corrodable in the room.  HF may be worse; I
> don't
> know.
> 

HCl is a gas dissolved in water.

At room temperatures (or higher) it will gas off
but because of the air moisture tiny drops of liquid HCl will form
instantenously.

Add water until around 25 percent concentration should stop most of the
gasification.



Re: Raised Floors

2019-05-25 Thread Chuck Guzis via cctalk
On 5/24/19 9:12 PM, Carlos E Murillo-Sanchez via cctalk wrote:

> Sulfuric acid is hard to wash off; the amount that made it to the room
> must have been pretty small, otherwise people couldn't be allowed in. 
> And, if it was bad enough to corrode boards, imagine what that would do
> to your lungs and all mucous membranes in your body...

In my limited experience, there's nothing much worse than concentrated
hydrochloric acid. A contain of the stuff inadvertently left open will
soon corrode anything corrodable in the room.  HF may be worse; I don't
know.

--Chuck



Re: Raised Floors

2019-05-24 Thread Carlos E Murillo-Sanchez via cctalk

Mark Matlock via cctalk wrote:

The discussion on raised floors in data centers reminded me of an 
interesting past experience. My company had installed its first supervisory 
process control system in an enzyme plant. The plant had been around for quite 
some time and the process control system was part of a retrofit of the 
facility. Part of that retrofit was remodeling a room for the PDP-11/44 and the 
related racks of industrial controllers. There were hundreds of cables carrying 
various analog and digital signals and control signals under the raised floor 
that they installed.

The only bad thing about the location of the data center was that it was 
directly under some tanks that were installed on the roof. One tank was for 
concentrated sulfuric acid which was used to adjust pH in the fermenters. That 
acid tank was filled from tanker trucks that would come from time to time. One 
day a trucker who was filling the tank was not paying attention and over filled 
the roof tank and acid overflowed over onto the roof which should have held the 
overflow, but it was a flat roof designed to protect from rain not concentrated 
sulfuric acid. Down in the data center the operator noticed that liquid was 
flowing down the walls of the room and past the raised floor tiles into the 
space below. It was easy to confirm it was acid since it was attacking the 
paint on the wall. The acid pooled under the floor with the cables.

  That was when they called the research chemists next door. We came in and 
determined that there were some drains under the floor (it had been a factory 
room before it was converted) and we suggested that they flush the space under 
the floor with water to dilute the acid to get as much of it out as possible. 
Then they used fans to try to dry out the room and the space under the floor.

  After all this, miraculously everything seemed ok, but about once every 6 
weeks or so that PDP-11/44 would develop some issue and the DEC field service 
guy (it was under contract) would come out and swap a board or two, marveling 
at how he had never seen boards that were so corroded. In retrospect I’m amazed 
that 11/44 survived as well as it did.

Mark

Sulfuric acid is hard to wash off; the amount that made it to the room 
must have been pretty small, otherwise people couldn't be allowed in.  
And, if it was bad enough to corrode boards, imagine what that would do 
to your lungs and all mucous membranes in your body...


carlos.



Re: Raised Floors

2019-05-24 Thread Carlos E Murillo-Sanchez via cctalk

Mark Matlock via cctalk wrote:

The discussion on raised floors in data centers reminded me of an 
interesting past experience. My company had installed its first supervisory 
process control system in an enzyme plant. The plant had been around for quite 
some time and the process control system was part of a retrofit of the 
facility. Part of that retrofit was remodeling a room for the PDP-11/44 and the 
related racks of industrial controllers. There were hundreds of cables carrying 
various analog and digital signals and control signals under the raised floor 
that they installed.

The only bad thing about the location of the data center was that it was 
directly under some tanks that were installed on the roof. One tank was for 
concentrated sulfuric acid which was used to adjust pH in the fermenters. That 
acid tank was filled from tanker trucks that would come from time to time. One 
day a trucker who was filling the tank was not paying attention and over filled 
the roof tank and acid overflowed over onto the roof which should have held the 
overflow, but it was a flat roof designed to protect from rain not concentrated 
sulfuric acid. Down in the data center the operator noticed that liquid was 
flowing down the walls of the room and past the raised floor tiles into the 
space below. It was easy to confirm it was acid since it was attacking the 
paint on the wall. The acid pooled under the floor with the cables.

  That was when they called the research chemists next door. We came in and 
determined that there were some drains under the floor (it had been a factory 
room before it was converted) and we suggested that they flush the space under 
the floor with water to dilute the acid to get as much of it out as possible. 
Then they used fans to try to dry out the room and the space under the floor.

  After all this, miraculously everything seemed ok, but about once every 6 
weeks or so that PDP-11/44 would develop some issue and the DEC field service 
guy (it was under contract) would come out and swap a board or two, marveling 
at how he had never seen boards that were so corroded. In retrospect I’m amazed 
that 11/44 survived as well as it did.

Mark

Sulfuric acid is hard to wash off; the amount that made it to the room 
must have been pretty small, otherwise people couldn't be allowed in.  
And, if it was bad enough to corrode boards, imagine what that would do 
to your lungs and all mucous membranes in your body...


carlos.



Re: Raised Floors

2019-05-24 Thread Paul Koning via cctalk



> On May 24, 2019, at 12:35 PM, Mark Matlock via cctalk  
> wrote:
> 
>   The discussion on raised floors in data centers reminded me of an 
> interesting past experience. My company had installed its first supervisory 
> process control system in an enzyme plant. ...
> 
>   The only bad thing about the location of the data center was that it was 
> directly under some tanks that were installed on the roof. One tank was for 
> concentrated sulfuric acid which was used to adjust pH in the fermenters
> 
> After all this, miraculously everything seemed ok, but about once every 6 
> weeks or so that PDP-11/44 would develop some issue and the DEC field service 
> guy (it was under contract) would come out and swap a board or two, marveling 
> at how he had never seen boards that were so corroded. 

No kidding...

I've seen microphotographs of corroded circuit boards showing the impact of 
nasty environments.  Sulphur dioxide fumes are notorious.  The examples we were 
given supposedly came from one of two kinds of shops: rubber tire factories, or 
car design studios.

The latter was a surprise.  It turns out traditional (and still used) car body 
design is done by making full scale models from clay, and the particular clay 
used for this has a very high sulphur content.

paul




RE: Raised Floors

2019-05-24 Thread Mark Matlock via cctalk
   The discussion on raised floors in data centers reminded me of an 
interesting past experience. My company had installed its first supervisory 
process control system in an enzyme plant. The plant had been around for quite 
some time and the process control system was part of a retrofit of the 
facility. Part of that retrofit was remodeling a room for the PDP-11/44 and the 
related racks of industrial controllers. There were hundreds of cables carrying 
various analog and digital signals and control signals under the raised floor 
that they installed. 

   The only bad thing about the location of the data center was that it was 
directly under some tanks that were installed on the roof. One tank was for 
concentrated sulfuric acid which was used to adjust pH in the fermenters. That 
acid tank was filled from tanker trucks that would come from time to time. One 
day a trucker who was filling the tank was not paying attention and over filled 
the roof tank and acid overflowed over onto the roof which should have held the 
overflow, but it was a flat roof designed to protect from rain not concentrated 
sulfuric acid. Down in the data center the operator noticed that liquid was 
flowing down the walls of the room and past the raised floor tiles into the 
space below. It was easy to confirm it was acid since it was attacking the 
paint on the wall. The acid pooled under the floor with the cables.

 That was when they called the research chemists next door. We came in and 
determined that there were some drains under the floor (it had been a factory 
room before it was converted) and we suggested that they flush the space under 
the floor with water to dilute the acid to get as much of it out as possible. 
Then they used fans to try to dry out the room and the space under the floor.

 After all this, miraculously everything seemed ok, but about once every 6 
weeks or so that PDP-11/44 would develop some issue and the DEC field service 
guy (it was under contract) would come out and swap a board or two, marveling 
at how he had never seen boards that were so corroded. In retrospect I’m amazed 
that 11/44 survived as well as it did.

Mark


Re: Raised Floors

2019-05-23 Thread Craig Ruff via cctalk
I should have been more clear in my last response.  The 2x2 grid of the floor 
tiles does not extend to the floor, but to an intermediate layer with wider 
spacing of the supports at the floor level.

Re: Raised Floors

2019-05-23 Thread Grant Taylor via cctalk

On 5/23/19 5:25 PM, Craig Ruff via cctech wrote:
I should have been more clear in my last response.  The 2x2 grid of the 
floor tiles does not extend to the floor, but to an intermediate layer 
with wider spacing of the supports at the floor level.


Thank you for the clarification.

I expected something like that might be the case.  But I didn't want to 
assume.




--
Grant. . . .
unix || die


RE: Raised Floors

2019-05-23 Thread Wayne S via cctalk



Sent from Mail<https://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=550986> for Windows 10

From: Ethan O'Toole via cctalk<mailto:cctalk@classiccmp.org>
Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2019 12:19 PM
To: Patrick Finnegan<mailto:p...@vax11.net>; General Discussion: On-Topic and 
Off-Topic Posts<mailto:cctalk@classiccmp.org>
Subject: Re: Raised Floors

> Purdue's insurer REQUIRES fire sprinklers in data centers.  And it's not
> atypical from what I've heard.  They are all dry, pre-action systems, which
> eliminate most of the danger of it accidentally dumping water.  It's
> unlikely that with a dry pipe, pre-action system water will be dumped
> somewhere that a person is standing without warning[0]. These days,
> equipment is easy to replace (compared to classic systems) given a good DR
> plan and a good insurance provider.

Most systems do air first (pre action) while triggering the PDU/UPS
systems to shut off first but some X seconds later water is coming out.
Out of the sprinkler head that was broken, not all heads?

Fire Sprinkler heads have bulbs with a liquid (many kinds based upon what the 
temperature is that they expand) that burst when a specific temp is reached 
thus allowing the water to flow. They operate independently of each other under 
the theory that the one that bursts first is closest to the fire and should  be 
allowed to have the maximum pressure and water flow.

> The NEC also requires[1] an EPO system to shut off all power sources
> (including any UPS).  I'm pretty sure that any fire that required a hose to
> be pulled off of a truck would first result in the power being shut off.

I'm sitting in a fairly large multi-tenant datacenter right now and there
are no EPO buttons. There might be somewhere on a UPS or PDU somewhere,
but nothing I could hit. The amount of damage from doing so would be
horrendus. The employees of the facility might have access to something,
but I would hope it's zoned out.
Some systems have the EPO outside the room in a fairly secure location (IE. 
locked room) to prevent someone accidentally or maliciously setting it off and 
causing damage. Sounds wrong, but the idea is that if there is a fire the 
sensors in the room will activate the EPO.  So no one should be manually 
turning power off unless they are properly authorized,  as shutting it off will 
cause false positives in other areas, like activating the fire alarm system and 
autodialing the fire department and possibly the police too.
That said, I have seen a “Delay” button, which, when pressed, would delay  
system activation until a few seconds after  it was released.  This was in a 
really large datacenter where an alarm would sound when activation was imminent 
and the system would activate 20 seconds later. Someone working on equipment 
might not have time to get out of the room before activation. The room was 
large enough and had a smaller  “forms” room and a IBM tech room with separate 
doors so people could be in those rooms and not react fast enough to get out in 
time. The delay was so that someone could give everyone enough time to get out 
of the room before the system activated. Yes, there was a phone next to the 
button so that maintenance could be called to reset everything if it was a 
false alarm.

> HPE server in the datacenter released its magic smoke.  Standard sprinklers
> only affect the area where the fire set them off, and don't have to douse
> your whole multi-1000 sq ft data center.

Right, and smoke sets off the smoke alarm. It takes actual heat to burst
the liquid thing that pops and lets the sprinkler head open. It's not
electronically controlled I would think? Not like the movie "hackers"
would portray?

> 2. In our experience, HPE servers tend to (internally) catch fire and
> release smoke at a rate of around 10-to-1 vs the Dell servers we've had.

Dell BIOS/Lifecycle crud is so slow and horrible :-( . Huge turd. Haven't
seen any HP boxes go up. Had thousands of Supermicro boxes at prior gig
and while the power supplies had engineering flaws never really saw one
put out smoke (sample size possibly 5 digit # of servers.)


--
: Ethan O'Toole




Re: Raised Floors

2019-05-23 Thread Ethan O'Toole via cctalk

Purdue's insurer REQUIRES fire sprinklers in data centers.  And it's not
atypical from what I've heard.  They are all dry, pre-action systems, which
eliminate most of the danger of it accidentally dumping water.  It's
unlikely that with a dry pipe, pre-action system water will be dumped
somewhere that a person is standing without warning[0]. These days,
equipment is easy to replace (compared to classic systems) given a good DR
plan and a good insurance provider.


Most systems do air first (pre action) while triggering the PDU/UPS 
systems to shut off first but some X seconds later water is coming out. 
Out of the sprinkler head that was broken, not all heads?



The NEC also requires[1] an EPO system to shut off all power sources
(including any UPS).  I'm pretty sure that any fire that required a hose to
be pulled off of a truck would first result in the power being shut off.


I'm sitting in a fairly large multi-tenant datacenter right now and there 
are no EPO buttons. There might be somewhere on a UPS or PDU somewhere, 
but nothing I could hit. The amount of damage from doing so would be 
horrendus. The employees of the facility might have access to something, 
but I would hope it's zoned out.



HPE server in the datacenter released its magic smoke.  Standard sprinklers
only affect the area where the fire set them off, and don't have to douse
your whole multi-1000 sq ft data center.


Right, and smoke sets off the smoke alarm. It takes actual heat to burst 
the liquid thing that pops and lets the sprinkler head open. It's not 
electronically controlled I would think? Not like the movie "hackers" 
would portray?



2. In our experience, HPE servers tend to (internally) catch fire and
release smoke at a rate of around 10-to-1 vs the Dell servers we've had.


Dell BIOS/Lifecycle crud is so slow and horrible :-( . Huge turd. Haven't 
seen any HP boxes go up. Had thousands of Supermicro boxes at prior gig 
and while the power supplies had engineering flaws never really saw one 
put out smoke (sample size possibly 5 digit # of servers.)



--
: Ethan O'Toole




Re: Raised Floors

2019-05-23 Thread Grant Taylor via cctalk

On 5/22/19 9:41 AM, Grant Taylor via cctalk wrote:
Both of the data centers / raised floors in my office have fire 
sprinklers.  I don't know if they lines are charged or dry.  (I'll 
inquire.)


I received an answer this morning stating that the fire sprinklers in 
the DC are "charged with air and if a sprinkler head goes off the air 
pressure releases but it will not flow water unless one other fire 
system device (smoke head pull station etc..) is activated."


So there is the possibility ~> likelihood that water will be pumped into 
the DC if a sprinkler head opens and another Indicator of Fire ;-) 
activates.




--
Grant. . . .
unix || die


Re: Raised Floors

2019-05-22 Thread Craig Ruff via cctalk


> On May 22, 2019, at 11:00 AM, cctech-requ...@classiccmp.org wrote:
> From: Grant Taylor 
> 
> On 5/21/19 5:33 PM, Craig Ruff via cctech wrote:
>> The NCAR Wyoming Supercomputer Center has raised floors of about 20 feet.
> 
> Did the support posts go all the way down?  Or was there some sort of 
> grid work that supported the raised floor above an open area that 
> contained the PDUs?

It was moderately open below the floor, there are columns that support the 
grid.  I looked, but I don't have a picture in the under floor area when I was 
up there years ago, and didn't see anything obvious on the NCAR or Wyoming web 
sites.  There is a video at https://www.youtube.com/embed/u4H7U5Weopw 
<https://www.youtube.com/embed/u4H7U5Weopw> that shows some of the support 
equipment briefly, but not the underfloor area.

Re: Raised Floors

2019-05-22 Thread Grant Taylor via cctalk

On 5/22/19 5:46 PM, Craig Ruff via cctech wrote:
It was moderately open below the floor, there are columns that 
support the grid.


The raised floor at work has posts (I guess you could call them columns) 
at the corner of every tile that run down to the floor.  This is why I'm 
asking if the posts / columns that you're talking about were in a 2'x2' 
grid or if that grid was supported by something else that had wider spacing.


I looked, but I don't have a picture in the under floor 
area when I was up there years ago, and didn't see anything 
obvious on the NCAR or Wyoming web sites.


ACK

There is a video at https://www.youtube.com/embed/u4H7U5Weopw that 
shows some of the support equipment briefly, but not the underfloor 
area.


That was … a different video.  I feel like it was more of a marketing 
slick / public relations type thing.  There was exceptionally little 
detail, and what I did see was massively watered down.  I feel like 
technical terms were purposefully taken out of the video.




--
Grant. . . .
unix || die


Re: Raised Floors

2019-05-22 Thread Grant Taylor via cctalk

On 5/22/19 9:08 AM, Patrick Finnegan via cctalk wrote:

Purdue's insurer REQUIRES fire sprinklers in data centers.


Both of the data centers / raised floors in my office have fire 
sprinklers.  I don't know if they lines are charged or dry.  (I'll inquire.)


The local fire department does a walk through spot check quarterly (if 
not more frequent b/c we give them lunch in our cafeteria) and annual 
full inspection of the fire detection and suppression system.


I also know for a fact that the DCs do have plumbing under the raised 
floor because I've heard talk about an automatic drain flush system that 
was historically used.  (I'm not sure it's used any more.)  I've also 
heard the maintenance crew talk about taking five gallon buckets of 
water into the DC to manually flush drains.


I've also heard of not infrequent stories of condensation from 
(overhead) air ducts dripping in the DC.


There's also the occasional leak during a heavy storm where non-trivial 
amounts of water come in through said duct work.


I've got a different horror story from a job 20 years ago where water 
would seep through the sidewalk onto an old IBM mainframe.  They kept 
plastic up most of the time and had drip trays with drain connections 
that sat on top of equipment.




--
Grant. . . .
unix || die


Re: Raised Floors

2019-05-22 Thread Christian Corti via cctalk

On Wed, 22 May 2019, Chuck Guzis wrote:

So how are data centers cooled with water now?  Does the water cool
coldplates directly?


Sort of, see for example the Rittal LCP system.


I've had only a couple of instances where cooling water was used.  In


All current high-density rack systems need liquid cooling. I want to 
remind that a single rack may produce 10kW of heat or more.



the case of CDC mainframes, it was used to cool the condenser coils in
the refrigeration units (located in the mainframe).  I believe that Cray
initially used the same guy that CDC used to fabricate the cooling tubing.


That is how todays rack systems work.

Christian


Re: Raised Floors

2019-05-22 Thread Patrick Finnegan via cctalk
On Wed, May 22, 2019 at 3:43 AM Jim Manley via cctalk 
wrote:

> Someone should be sued and go to prison for signing off on permits that
> would allow water to get anywhere near a DC - it's a violation of the
> National Electric Code, for starters.  If anyone sees something like that,
> it should be reported immediately, and not within the organization, since
> the facilities people are either incompetent or complicit in keeping quiet
> about it.  That's what anonymous.hotlines are for, and the media, if no
> action occurs with the hotlines - we're talking about the possibility of
> serious injury and death here.
>

Purdue's insurer REQUIRES fire sprinklers in data centers.  And it's not
atypical from what I've heard.  They are all dry, pre-action systems, which
eliminate most of the danger of it accidentally dumping water.  It's
unlikely that with a dry pipe, pre-action system water will be dumped
somewhere that a person is standing without warning[0]. These days,
equipment is easy to replace (compared to classic systems) given a good DR
plan and a good insurance provider.

The NEC also requires[1] an EPO system to shut off all power sources
(including any UPS).  I'm pretty sure that any fire that required a hose to
be pulled off of a truck would first result in the power being shut off.

The experiences that I've had with non-water based fire suppression systems
is that they're way too twitchy, and likely to go off because (another[2])
HPE server in the datacenter released its magic smoke.  Standard sprinklers
only affect the area where the fire set them off, and don't have to douse
your whole multi-1000 sq ft data center.

0. Generally, multiple smoke/heat detectors have to be triggered before the
sprinkler system is charged with water.

1. The NEC isn't always followed when management decides there should be an
exception.  Insurance company guidelines are followed because not following
them has a tangible cost.  No one is going to be sued/go to prison for
this, at least here.

2. In our experience, HPE servers tend to (internally) catch fire and
release smoke at a rate of around 10-to-1 vs the Dell servers we've had.

Pat
(Standing back and looking at the mess he made of cctalk... Sorry, Jay.)


Re: Raised Floors

2019-05-22 Thread Paul Berger via cctalk



On 2019-05-22 10:00 a.m., Paul Koning via cctalk wrote:



On May 22, 2019, at 6:57 AM, Stefan Skoglund via cctalk  
wrote:

ons 2019-05-22 klockan 08:45 + skrev Wayne S via cctalk:

...
Funny, but Halon is outlawed and having it around did seem to bother
them. It was replaced with some other gas system that i can't
remember the name.


It is a gas bottle with gas under pressure - they dont like getting hot
they become explosive in that case.

Nitrogen.  I remember seeing an installation with a whole row of compressed 
nitrogen bottles, looking a lot like a row of welding gas tanks.  It came with 
major warning signs about the danger to personnel when it goes off.

I think Halon is far less dangerous because it doesn't just work by displacing 
oxygen, though the details escape me.

paul

It was reputed that you could breath the halon making it easier to exit 
the room.  One of the big dangers from halon discharge in a room with a 
raised floor was the under floor nozzles would fling floor tiles up into 
the air and also raise a lot of dust.  A coworker that was in a room 
during a halon dump broke a leg falling into the hole left by a 
displaced tile while running for the door.  Most flooding systems gave a 
warning alarm before they actually discharged and had an override so 
that the automatic system could be stopped.  I was never in a room 
during a discharge but I have seen video of it.  I have also heard 
stories of it displacing enough floor tiles to affect the stability of 
the floor leading to a collapse of the floor supports and all the 
equipment ending up resting on top of cables and everything else under 
the floor.


Previously there where comments made about plumbing under the floor, in 
my experience it was pretty common for water cooled equipment and also 
for air conditioners that used chilled water for cooling.  The current 
water cooled systems I am familiar with have a coolant loop inside the 
rack that includes heat exchangers that  is separate from the building 
chilled water supply.  Inside the machines there are "water" blocks in 
direct contact with CPUs and memory and also sometimes the back door of 
the rack has a heat exchanger built into it.  Hot air exits out the back 
and is cooled by the back door the intent is to reduce the load on room 
air conditioning.


Paul.

Halon was banned because it was implicated as one of the chemicals that 
damaged the ozone layer.  I recall one customer that had a CO2 flooding 
system




Re: Raised Floors

2019-05-22 Thread Paul Koning via cctalk



> On May 22, 2019, at 6:57 AM, Stefan Skoglund via cctalk 
>  wrote:
> 
> ons 2019-05-22 klockan 08:45 + skrev Wayne S via cctalk:
>> ...
>> Funny, but Halon is outlawed and having it around did seem to bother
>> them. It was replaced with some other gas system that i can't
>> remember the name.
>> 
> 
> It is a gas bottle with gas under pressure - they dont like getting hot
> they become explosive in that case.

Nitrogen.  I remember seeing an installation with a whole row of compressed 
nitrogen bottles, looking a lot like a row of welding gas tanks.  It came with 
major warning signs about the danger to personnel when it goes off.

I think Halon is far less dangerous because it doesn't just work by displacing 
oxygen, though the details escape me.

paul



Re: Raised Floors

2019-05-22 Thread Tor Arntsen via cctalk
On Wed, 22 May 2019 at 10:34, Stefan Skoglund via cctalk
 wrote:
> Halon should be completely and fully illegal in civilian installations.

In 1990 or 1991 I was inside a computer room when somebody
accidentally pushed an elbow into the fire emergency button.. and the
halon went off. Big room, many rows of tall racks. There were working
desks there too, so papers flew everywhere. I just ran for the
emergency exit door.
The folks in the roombs above later said they could feel the floor
coming up. This was a concrete building. All in all it was quite a
shocking experience.


Re: Raised Floors

2019-05-22 Thread Stefan Skoglund via cctalk
ons 2019-05-22 klockan 08:45 + skrev Wayne S via cctalk:
> All true. Just sayin' that water can get into the DC even when it's
> not intended. 
> When fighting a fire in another part of a structure, the water may
> find it's way into the DC.  
> 
> Not sure about not allowing water to get near a dc, can you explain
> that statement?
> The 2 Liebert a/c units that cooled the DC were located inside the
> room and were water cooled so there was water around. I also remember
> the old IBM 3032 computers at my first site needed chilled water to
> operate so there was a lot of piped water going into the room. 
> 
> The FD did regular inspections and it didn't seem to bother them in
> either case.
> Funny, but Halon is outlawed and having it around did seem to bother
> them. It was replaced with some other gas system that i can't
> remember the name.
> 

It is a gas bottle with gas under pressure - they dont like getting hot
they become explosive in that case.

halon is also very much oxygen depriving ie asphyxiating.



Re: Raised Floors

2019-05-22 Thread Wayne S via cctalk
PS.. Sorry about the top posting. I'm old and i forgot.


Wayne


> On May 22, 2019, at 1:45 AM, Wayne S  wrote:
> 
> All true. Just sayin' that water can get into the DC even when it's not 
> intended. 
> When fighting a fire in another part of a structure, the water may find it's 
> way into the DC.  
> 
> Not sure about not allowing water to get near a dc, can you explain that 
> statement?
> The 2 Liebert a/c units that cooled the DC were located inside the room and 
> were water cooled so there was water around. I also remember the old IBM 3032 
> computers at my first site needed chilled water to operate so there was a lot 
> of piped water going into the room. 
> 
> The FD did regular inspections and it didn't seem to bother them in either 
> case.
> Funny, but Halon is outlawed and having it around did seem to bother them. It 
> was replaced with some other gas system that i can't remember the name.
> 
> 
> 
>> On May 22, 2019, at 12:43 AM, Jim Manley via cctalk  
>> wrote:
>> 
>> No firefighter in their right mind is going to knowingly pump a drop of
>> water anywhere near or in the direction of a data center, let alone into
>> it.  That's why they're equipped with Halon or other oxygen displacement,
>> cooling, and flame suppression systems, and the FDs are equipped with
>> appropriate Class 2 (Electrical) firefighting equipment.  FDs conduct
>> periodic inspections of all on-site fire-fighting equipment and the local
>> station shifts do walk-throughs to review their procedures.  If any
>> hazardous materials are present (guaranteed in a DC), they're also taken
>> into account.
>> 
>> The FDs that serve industrial sites are equipped to fight fires where the
>> fuels can range from paper through plastics, up to actual petrochemical
>> fuels.  I worked in the last semiconductor fab still operating in Silicon
>> Valley and worked with the City of Santa Clara FD on their plans, which had
>> to deal with the presence of extreme toxins and corrosives such as
>> hydrofluoric acid used to etch silicon wafers. They used to be responsible
>> for the Intel fab next door until it was shut down and the fab in
>> Hillsboro, OR, took over all R production.  They said it was a nightmare
>> waiting to happen because of the volume of extremely hazardous chemicals
>> used on-site.
>> 
>> Someone should be sued and go to prison for signing off on permits that
>> would allow water to get anywhere near a DC - it's a violation of the
>> National Electric Code, for starters.  If anyone sees something like that,
>> it should be reported immediately, and not within the organization, since
>> the facilities people are either incompetent or complicit in keeping quiet
>> about it.  That's what anonymous.hotlines are for, and the media, if no
>> action occurs with the hotlines - we're talking about the possibility of
>> serious injury and death here.
>> 
>> 
>> On Tue, May 21, 2019 at 11:12 PM Grant Taylor via cctalk <
>> cctalk@classiccmp.org> wrote:
>> 
>>>> On 5/21/19 5:33 PM, Craig Ruff via cctech wrote:
>>>> The NCAR Wyoming Supercomputer Center has raised floors of about 20 feet.
>>> 
>>> Did the support posts go all the way down?  Or was there some sort of
>>> grid work that supported the raised floor above an open area that
>>> contained the PDUs?
>>> 
>>> I ask because the PDUs in the DC in my office are wider (and longer)
>>> than a floor tile.  As such, it would require some special
>>> accommodations if the support posts were 20 feet tall.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> --
>>> Grant. . . .
>>> unix || die
>>> 


Re: Raised Floors

2019-05-22 Thread Wayne S via cctalk
Have to rephrase what i said about the Liebert units being water cooled. They 
used water for humidity control not for cooling. They used regular refrigerant 
for that.
 

Wayne


> On May 22, 2019, at 1:50 AM, Wayne S  wrote:
> 
> PS.. Sorry about the top posting. I'm old and i forgot.
> 
> 
> Wayne
> 
> 
>> On May 22, 2019, at 1:45 AM, Wayne S  wrote:
>> 
>> All true. Just sayin' that water can get into the DC even when it's not 
>> intended. 
>> When fighting a fire in another part of a structure, the water may find it's 
>> way into the DC.  
>> 
>> Not sure about not allowing water to get near a dc, can you explain that 
>> statement?
>> The 2 Liebert a/c units that cooled the DC were located inside the room and 
>> were water cooled so there was water around. I also remember the old IBM 
>> 3032 computers at my first site needed chilled water to operate so there was 
>> a lot of piped water going into the room. 
>> 
>> The FD did regular inspections and it didn't seem to bother them in either 
>> case.
>> Funny, but Halon is outlawed and having it around did seem to bother them. 
>> It was replaced with some other gas system that i can't remember the name.
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>> On May 22, 2019, at 12:43 AM, Jim Manley via cctalk  
>>> wrote:
>>> 
>>> No firefighter in their right mind is going to knowingly pump a drop of
>>> water anywhere near or in the direction of a data center, let alone into
>>> it.  That's why they're equipped with Halon or other oxygen displacement,
>>> cooling, and flame suppression systems, and the FDs are equipped with
>>> appropriate Class 2 (Electrical) firefighting equipment.  FDs conduct
>>> periodic inspections of all on-site fire-fighting equipment and the local
>>> station shifts do walk-throughs to review their procedures.  If any
>>> hazardous materials are present (guaranteed in a DC), they're also taken
>>> into account.
>>> 
>>> The FDs that serve industrial sites are equipped to fight fires where the
>>> fuels can range from paper through plastics, up to actual petrochemical
>>> fuels.  I worked in the last semiconductor fab still operating in Silicon
>>> Valley and worked with the City of Santa Clara FD on their plans, which had
>>> to deal with the presence of extreme toxins and corrosives such as
>>> hydrofluoric acid used to etch silicon wafers. They used to be responsible
>>> for the Intel fab next door until it was shut down and the fab in
>>> Hillsboro, OR, took over all R production.  They said it was a nightmare
>>> waiting to happen because of the volume of extremely hazardous chemicals
>>> used on-site.
>>> 
>>> Someone should be sued and go to prison for signing off on permits that
>>> would allow water to get anywhere near a DC - it's a violation of the
>>> National Electric Code, for starters.  If anyone sees something like that,
>>> it should be reported immediately, and not within the organization, since
>>> the facilities people are either incompetent or complicit in keeping quiet
>>> about it.  That's what anonymous.hotlines are for, and the media, if no
>>> action occurs with the hotlines - we're talking about the possibility of
>>> serious injury and death here.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> On Tue, May 21, 2019 at 11:12 PM Grant Taylor via cctalk <
>>> cctalk@classiccmp.org> wrote:
>>> 
>>>>> On 5/21/19 5:33 PM, Craig Ruff via cctech wrote:
>>>>> The NCAR Wyoming Supercomputer Center has raised floors of about 20 feet.
>>>> 
>>>> Did the support posts go all the way down?  Or was there some sort of
>>>> grid work that supported the raised floor above an open area that
>>>> contained the PDUs?
>>>> 
>>>> I ask because the PDUs in the DC in my office are wider (and longer)
>>>> than a floor tile.  As such, it would require some special
>>>> accommodations if the support posts were 20 feet tall.
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> --
>>>> Grant. . . .
>>>> unix || die
>>>> 


Re: Raised Floors

2019-05-22 Thread Wayne S via cctalk
All true. Just sayin' that water can get into the DC even when it's not 
intended. 
When fighting a fire in another part of a structure, the water may find it's 
way into the DC.  

Not sure about not allowing water to get near a dc, can you explain that 
statement?
The 2 Liebert a/c units that cooled the DC were located inside the room and 
were water cooled so there was water around. I also remember the old IBM 3032 
computers at my first site needed chilled water to operate so there was a lot 
of piped water going into the room. 

The FD did regular inspections and it didn't seem to bother them in either case.
Funny, but Halon is outlawed and having it around did seem to bother them. It 
was replaced with some other gas system that i can't remember the name.



> On May 22, 2019, at 12:43 AM, Jim Manley via cctalk  
> wrote:
> 
> No firefighter in their right mind is going to knowingly pump a drop of
> water anywhere near or in the direction of a data center, let alone into
> it.  That's why they're equipped with Halon or other oxygen displacement,
> cooling, and flame suppression systems, and the FDs are equipped with
> appropriate Class 2 (Electrical) firefighting equipment.  FDs conduct
> periodic inspections of all on-site fire-fighting equipment and the local
> station shifts do walk-throughs to review their procedures.  If any
> hazardous materials are present (guaranteed in a DC), they're also taken
> into account.
> 
> The FDs that serve industrial sites are equipped to fight fires where the
> fuels can range from paper through plastics, up to actual petrochemical
> fuels.  I worked in the last semiconductor fab still operating in Silicon
> Valley and worked with the City of Santa Clara FD on their plans, which had
> to deal with the presence of extreme toxins and corrosives such as
> hydrofluoric acid used to etch silicon wafers. They used to be responsible
> for the Intel fab next door until it was shut down and the fab in
> Hillsboro, OR, took over all R production.  They said it was a nightmare
> waiting to happen because of the volume of extremely hazardous chemicals
> used on-site.
> 
> Someone should be sued and go to prison for signing off on permits that
> would allow water to get anywhere near a DC - it's a violation of the
> National Electric Code, for starters.  If anyone sees something like that,
> it should be reported immediately, and not within the organization, since
> the facilities people are either incompetent or complicit in keeping quiet
> about it.  That's what anonymous.hotlines are for, and the media, if no
> action occurs with the hotlines - we're talking about the possibility of
> serious injury and death here.
> 
> 
> On Tue, May 21, 2019 at 11:12 PM Grant Taylor via cctalk <
> cctalk@classiccmp.org> wrote:
> 
>>> On 5/21/19 5:33 PM, Craig Ruff via cctech wrote:
>>> The NCAR Wyoming Supercomputer Center has raised floors of about 20 feet.
>> 
>> Did the support posts go all the way down?  Or was there some sort of
>> grid work that supported the raised floor above an open area that
>> contained the PDUs?
>> 
>> I ask because the PDUs in the DC in my office are wider (and longer)
>> than a floor tile.  As such, it would require some special
>> accommodations if the support posts were 20 feet tall.
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> --
>> Grant. . . .
>> unix || die
>> 


Re: Raised Floors

2019-05-22 Thread Stefan Skoglund via cctalk
ons 2019-05-22 klockan 01:42 -0600 skrev Jim Manley via cctalk:
> No firefighter in their right mind is going to knowingly pump a drop
> of
> water anywhere near or in the direction of a data center, let alone
> into
> it.  That's why they're equipped with Halon or other oxygen
> displacement,
> cooling, and flame suppression systems, and the FDs are equipped with
> appropriate Class 2 (Electrical) firefighting equipment.  FDs conduct
> periodic inspections of all on-site fire-fighting equipment and the
> local
> station shifts do walk-throughs to review their procedures.  If any
> hazardous materials are present (guaranteed in a DC), they're also
> taken
> into account.

Halon should be completely and fully illegal in civilian installations.
No excuses. Deionized water is just as effective.
(Halon is still permitted in EU in some military applications and
aircraft but the clock is ticking on the usage of halon in civil
aircraft.)



Re: Raised Floors

2019-05-22 Thread Jim Manley via cctalk
No firefighter in their right mind is going to knowingly pump a drop of
water anywhere near or in the direction of a data center, let alone into
it.  That's why they're equipped with Halon or other oxygen displacement,
cooling, and flame suppression systems, and the FDs are equipped with
appropriate Class 2 (Electrical) firefighting equipment.  FDs conduct
periodic inspections of all on-site fire-fighting equipment and the local
station shifts do walk-throughs to review their procedures.  If any
hazardous materials are present (guaranteed in a DC), they're also taken
into account.

The FDs that serve industrial sites are equipped to fight fires where the
fuels can range from paper through plastics, up to actual petrochemical
fuels.  I worked in the last semiconductor fab still operating in Silicon
Valley and worked with the City of Santa Clara FD on their plans, which had
to deal with the presence of extreme toxins and corrosives such as
hydrofluoric acid used to etch silicon wafers. They used to be responsible
for the Intel fab next door until it was shut down and the fab in
Hillsboro, OR, took over all R production.  They said it was a nightmare
waiting to happen because of the volume of extremely hazardous chemicals
used on-site.

Someone should be sued and go to prison for signing off on permits that
would allow water to get anywhere near a DC - it's a violation of the
National Electric Code, for starters.  If anyone sees something like that,
it should be reported immediately, and not within the organization, since
the facilities people are either incompetent or complicit in keeping quiet
about it.  That's what anonymous.hotlines are for, and the media, if no
action occurs with the hotlines - we're talking about the possibility of
serious injury and death here.


On Tue, May 21, 2019 at 11:12 PM Grant Taylor via cctalk <
cctalk@classiccmp.org> wrote:

> On 5/21/19 5:33 PM, Craig Ruff via cctech wrote:
> > The NCAR Wyoming Supercomputer Center has raised floors of about 20 feet.
>
> Did the support posts go all the way down?  Or was there some sort of
> grid work that supported the raised floor above an open area that
> contained the PDUs?
>
> I ask because the PDUs in the DC in my office are wider (and longer)
> than a floor tile.  As such, it would require some special
> accommodations if the support posts were 20 feet tall.
>
>
>
> --
> Grant. . . .
> unix || die
>


RE: Raised Floors

2019-05-21 Thread Wayne S via cctalk
Interesting.

The arguments I’ve heard from a few data center builders/managers is that the 
main factor in how a DC is built is that can the business be insured against 
catastrophic loss. It has to meet all fire codes and has to be reasonably 
resistant to unforeseen catastrophes, like flooding and earthquakes.



For instance, in the event of an earthquake,  equipment should be anchored to 
the floor so that it won’t fall over in an and no wiring should be able to 
short out. Ups power should be out of the room in case of fire so that the 
firemen can shut it off or else they won’t go into the room because of the 
shock hazard so the equipment will probably be lost until the fire burns out. 
And you probably won’t have business continuity insurance. Water hazard is a 
big one.  A/C water leaks, water/liquid from firemen and fire suppression 
systems, and water supply leaks damage equipment, so if you build on the first 
floor a slightly raised floor with a drain in it will usually pass insurance 
inspection.  Above the first floor then a flat floor with somewhere for liquids 
to go is probably okay. Also depends on the computer equipment in the room. If 
everything is in racks at least a few inches above the floor,  where liquid can 
build up, then it’s probably going to be okay.  If they sit on the floor then 
not so good.

If the DC is in the basement below sewer pipe level, then you need to take some 
extra precautions to provide somewhere for the water to go.



I’ve been involved in 3 incidents regarding water at different sites… One where 
a drain pipe cap in another part of the building popped off during a heavy 
rainstorm and rainwater somehow flooded the computer room. No damage because 
the room was raised floor with 6 feet underneath. Another time a 12” water main 
in the cafeteria broke and flooded everything. That was a lot of water – took a 
long time to shut off. Computer room was okay because of raised floor, and 
because the water ran out the front of the building,  just had to soak up the 
water with rags, but people outside the room who had towers sitting on the 
floor lost them.  You could actually see the highwater mark on the computers. 
Third time was the roof leaked over the computer room during a rainstorm and 
water got in. The DC was a non-raised floor on the second floor so the water 
ran under the doors and down the stairs.










From: cctech  on behalf of Craig Ruff via cctech 

Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2019 4:33:07 PM
To: cct...@classiccmp.org
Subject: Re: Raised Floors

The NCAR Wyoming Supercomputer Center has raised floors of about 20 feet. The 
auxilary cooling and PDUs are installed down there.  Needless to say, you don't 
pull a floor tile there unless you are on the facility staff!


Re: Raised Floors

2019-05-21 Thread Grant Taylor via cctalk

On 5/21/19 5:33 PM, Craig Ruff via cctech wrote:

The NCAR Wyoming Supercomputer Center has raised floors of about 20 feet.


Did the support posts go all the way down?  Or was there some sort of 
grid work that supported the raised floor above an open area that 
contained the PDUs?


I ask because the PDUs in the DC in my office are wider (and longer) 
than a floor tile.  As such, it would require some special 
accommodations if the support posts were 20 feet tall.




--
Grant. . . .
unix || die


Re: Raised Floors

2019-05-21 Thread Craig Ruff via cctalk
The NCAR Wyoming Supercomputer Center has raised floors of about 20 feet. The 
auxilary cooling and PDUs are installed down there.  Needless to say, you don't 
pull a floor tile there unless you are on the facility staff!