ilto:cctalk-boun...@classiccmp.org] On Behalf Of Randy
> Dawson via cctalk
> Sent: 11 July 2017 23:31
> To: Chuck Guzis ; General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-
> Topic Posts
> Subject: IBM Scientific Subroutine Package (was Re: SIMH .tap file 7
track?)
>
> Hi Chuck,
>
>
>
Package (was Re: SIMH .tap file 7 track?)
On 7/11/17 3:36 PM, Al Kossow via cctalk wrote:
>
> On 7/11/17 3:31 PM, Randy Dawson via cctalk wrote:
>> Hi Chuck,
>>
>>
>> Maybe you can answer a related question to the conversion of IBM 360 .tap
>> files.
>&
On 7/11/17 3:36 PM, Al Kossow via cctalk wrote:
>
> On 7/11/17 3:31 PM, Randy Dawson via cctalk wrote:
>> Hi Chuck,
>>
>>
>> Maybe you can answer a related question to the conversion of IBM 360 .tap
>> files.
>>
>>
>> I see the IBM FORTRAN Scientific Subroutine Package on Bitsavers in .tap
>>
On 7/11/17 3:31 PM, Randy Dawson via cctalk wrote:
> Hi Chuck,
>
>
> Maybe you can answer a related question to the conversion of IBM 360 .tap
> files.
>
>
> I see the IBM FORTRAN Scientific Subroutine Package on Bitsavers in .tap
> format:
>
>
> http://bitsavers.trailing-edge.com/bits/IBM
into the ASCII files?
Thanks,
Randy
From: cctalk on behalf of Chuck Guzis via
cctalk
Sent: Tuesday, July 11, 2017 3:10 PM
To: CCtalk
Subject: SIMH .tap file 7 track?
This is one that I haven't seen addressed.
If I'm reading a 7-track tape and writ
This is one that I haven't seen addressed.
If I'm reading a 7-track tape and writing a SIMH .tap file, what's the
custom? 6 bits per 8-bit byte, right-justified (i.e. 2 high bits
zero-filled)?
Just wondering if there's a convention established for this.
--Chuck
