At 06:40 PM 9/14/2016, KnoppixLiveKiller wrote:
>Is it really that hard to bottom post?
With that things have gotten really ridiculous, so goodbye for good.
Dale H. Cook, Contract IT Administrator, Roanoke/Lynchburg, VA
http://plymouthcolony.net/starcityeng/index.html
yes it is. The cursor is at the top of the box with the emails in most
readers I've seen, and unless I want to leave a posting long and enter
comments thru the body, sometimes top posting works.
On 9/14/2016 3:40 PM, KnoppixLiveKiller wrote:
Is it really that hard to bottom post?
On 09/14/2016 05:30 PM, j...@cimmeri.com wrote:
On 9/14/2016 4:58 PM, Dale H. Cook wrote:
At 05:42 PM 9/14/2016, Steven M Jones wrote:
How do you justify making everybody conform to your preferred behavior?
I don't, but the behavior and archiving of this list is bound by the
software
On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 3:55 PM, Dale H. Cook wrote:
> At 06:30 PM 9/14/2016, J. wrote:
>
> >How is sending a new email any different than replying / changing subject
> line?
>
> The message headers contain data that identify which thread a message is
> part of. Subscribers
At 06:30 PM 9/14/2016, J. wrote:
>How is sending a new email any different than replying / changing subject line?
The message headers contain data that identify which thread a message is part
of. Subscribers normally do not see that data because very few people have a
reason to look at the
On 9/14/2016 3:30 PM, j...@cimmeri.com wrote:
On 9/14/2016 4:58 PM, Dale H. Cook wrote:
At 05:42 PM 9/14/2016, Steven M Jones wrote:
How do you justify making everybody conform to your preferred behavior?
I don't, but the behavior and archiving of this list is bound by the
software that
How is sending a new email any different than replying / changing subject
line?
A brand-new (not reply) message does not carry the References: header
chain from the previous thread. For threading-aware MUAs, this makes sure
the new conversation doesn't get buried in the old thread. Or
On 9/14/2016 4:58 PM, Dale H. Cook wrote:
At 05:42 PM 9/14/2016, Steven M Jones wrote:
How do you justify making everybody conform to your preferred behavior?
I don't, but the behavior and archiving of this list is bound by the software
that it runs under.
Dale H. Cook, Contract IT
At 05:42 PM 9/14/2016, Steven M Jones wrote:
>How do you justify making everybody conform to your preferred behavior?
I don't, but the behavior and archiving of this list is bound by the software
that it runs under.
Dale H. Cook, Contract IT Administrator, Roanoke/Lynchburg, VA
On 9/14/16 2:42 PM, Steven M Jones wrote:
> On 09/14/16 09:52, Dale H. Cook wrote:
>>
>> Please do not change the subject line in a thread.
> And what's so horrible about that?
nothing
It has taken twenty years to get to the point on cclk where the subject
line changes at all.
On 09/14/16 09:52, Dale H. Cook wrote:
>
> Please do not change the subject line in a thread. The subject line
> of this thread has been changed twice since it began as "68K Macs
> with MacOS 7.5 still in production use..." When you change a subject
> line the header information concerning the
11 matches
Mail list logo