Re: What is vintage (was: Why don't you respect the mail threads?!)

Sounds like some people need to adjust their sarcasm meters. Guys: BILL WAS JOKING because the topic was about threadjacking.

Re: What is vintage (was: Why don't you respect the mail threads?!)

> On Feb 25, 2018, at 6:35 PM, Grant Taylor via cctalk > wrote: > > On 02/25/2018 05:51 PM, Bill Degnan via cctalk wrote: >> What is vintage computing? > > I think the Department of Motor Vehicle of my home state considers any cars > over 25 years old to be historic ~>

Re: What is vintage (was: Why don't you respect the mail threads?!)

What is vintage computing? On Sun, 25 Feb 2018, Grant Taylor via cctalk wrote: I think the Department of Motor Vehicle of my home state considers any cars over 25 years old to be historic ~> vintage. Which aspects do you consider the DMV to be competent in? Is a 1983 car really "historic ~>

Re: What is vintage (was: Why don't you respect the mail threads?!)

On 02/25/2018 05:51 PM, Bill Degnan via cctalk wrote: What is vintage computing? I think the Department of Motor Vehicle of my home state considers any cars over 25 years old to be historic ~> vintage. Does something like that count? -- Grant. . . . unix || die

Re: What is vintage (was: Why don't you respect the mail threads?!)

On Sun, 25 Feb 2018, Bill Degnan via cctalk wrote: What is vintage computing? I think it's the IBM PC. Anything else is not vintage computing. Frankly, I'm shocked. I could have understood, if you were to have chosen Atari, Superbrain, Commodore 64, or Coleco Adam. Anything other than

What is vintage (was: Why don't you respect the mail threads?!)

What is vintage computing? I think it's the IBM PC. Anything else is not vintage computing. b On Thu, Feb 22, 2018 at 3:36 PM, Evan Koblentz via cctalk < cctalk@classiccmp.org> wrote: > It's gone meta: people threadjacking a thread about threadjacking. Now > it's some posters trying to show