Here is another scan from a different location:
http://www.imsai.net/download/IEEE_696_1983.pdf
I hope this may help.
smp
- Original Message -
On 12/20/2015 04:02 AM, Tor Arntsen wrote:
On 20 December 2015 at 07:25, Eric Smith wrote:
Is this it? (1983)
http://www.pestingers.net/PDFs/Other_computers/IEEE%20696%20S-100%20Bus%20Specs.pdf
That's the one that's been screwed up by OCR.
What about this one?
Has same OCR problems. See figure 16 on page 38.
On Sun, Dec 20, 2015 at 11:11 AM, Chuck Guzis wrote:
> There's another one here also, but I assume it's also an OCR victim:
> http://www.z80.eu/dos65/DOS-65_IEEE_Standard_696_Guide.pdf
That's interesting, and thanks for pointing it out, but it isn't the standard.
On 20 December 2015 at 07:25, Eric Smith wrote:
>> Is this it? (1983)
>> http://www.pestingers.net/PDFs/Other_computers/IEEE%20696%20S-100%20Bus%20Specs.pdf
>
> That's the one that's been screwed up by OCR.
What about this one? Except for the front page and possibly the very
I asked:
> Does anyone have a scan of the IEEE-696 (S-100) standard that has NOT
> been run through OCR
The problem has been solved. Thanks!
At 03:04 PM 12/20/2015, Eric Smith wrote:
>The problem has been solved.
Is the solution available online?
Dale H. Cook, Roanoke/Lynchburg, VA
Osborne 1 / Kaypro 4-84 / Kaypro 1 / Amstrad PPC-640
http://plymouthcolony.net/starcity/radios/index.html
On 12/20/2015 11:13 AM, Eric Smith wrote:
On Sun, Dec 20, 2015 at 11:11 AM, Chuck Guzis
wrote:
There's another one here also, but I assume it's also an OCR
victim: http://www.z80.eu/dos65/DOS-65_IEEE_Standard_696_Guide.pdf
That's interesting, and thanks for pointing it out,
On Sun, Dec 20, 2015 at 12:28 PM, Chuck Guzis wrote:
> Does IEEE consider this to be copyrighted material?
Of course they do.
> Have you contacted the folks at IEEE for a copy?
It's withdrawn, so IEEE doesn't sell it. Most likely IHS Global
Engineering Documents does.
Not
> If so, 1983+95 = 2078 when it'll be public domain,
Jurisdiction-dependent. Not everywhere is crazy enough to follow the
USA's disney clause (though the Berne Convention does have some
possibly-relevant reciprocal recognition clauses).
What little I've been able to find on this in a few
On Sun, Dec 20, 2015 at 1:40 PM, Mouse wrote:
> What little I've been able to find on this in a few minutes indicates
> that "author's lifetime + 70" is more common than anything + 95.
In some (many?) jurisdictions that use author's lifetime + 70, for
works of
> Is this it? (1983)
> http://www.pestingers.net/PDFs/Other_computers/IEEE%20696%20S-100%20Bus%20Specs.pdf
That's the one that's been screwed up by OCR.
On 12/19/2015 07:57 PM, Eric Smith wrote:
Does anyone have a scan of the IEEE-696 (S-100) standard that has
NOT been run through OCR to screw up the typography (and even some of
the illustrations)?
I'm *not* looking for the draft, only the final standard.
Is this it? (1983)
Does anyone have a scan of the IEEE-696 (S-100) standard that has NOT
been run through OCR to screw up the typography (and even some of the
illustrations)?
I'm *not* looking for the draft, only the final standard.
14 matches
Mail list logo