Am 24.10.2016 um 23:28 schrieb Terry Stewart:
Here is some I wrote some time ago on my experiences with vintage viruses.
Bear in mind it's a narrative (and hence somewhat long-winded and rambling)
but anyway..here it is for anyone interested...
>>> What is the plural of a computer virus?).
>> Viruses.
>> The Latin word _virus_ [...]
>> More than you ever wanted to know, I'm sure.
> Actually, NO.
What Fred said. Across the board.
Thank you. That was informative, authoritative, and - impressive,
managing to combine this with the other
What is the plural of a computer virus?).
On Mon, 24 Oct 2016, Rich Alderson wrote:
Viruses.
The Latin word _virus_ means "slime, poison", and is a collective noun
. . .
Furthermore, it is a neuter (neither masculine nor feminine) o-stem noun,
. . .
The -i marker of nominative plurals is
From: Sean Conner
Sent: Monday, October 24, 2016 2:00 PM
> MS-DOS had CP/M at its heart, and it had its fair share of virii (viruses?
> What is the plural of a computer virus?).
Viruses.
The Latin word _virus_ means "slime, poison", and is a collective noun, like
English _milk_ or _flour_ or
Here is some I wrote some time ago on my experiences with vintage viruses.
Bear in mind it's a narrative (and hence somewhat long-winded and rambling)
but anyway..here it is for anyone interested...
http://www.classic-computers.org.nz/blog/2009-08-30-vintage-viruses.htm
Terry (Tez)
Memory protection does not protect you from a virus. It can protect other
running processes from being modified (if they belong to other users they
can't be infected at all; other processes owned by the user it's possible,
depending upon the system [1]) but that's it.
-spc
Sorry, I was
It was thus said that the Great et...@757.org once stated:
>
> Early Macs definitely had viruses, a few that I got from thrift stores
> still have the viruses on them. I don't think there is any memory
> protection at all. Software selection for MacOS was pretty crappy, and it
> was hard to get
It was thus said that the Great allison once stated:
> On 10/23/2016 09:15 PM, Mouse wrote:
> >> My favorite formatter was my S100 crate with CP/M, [it's] impossible
> >> to give a single user OS without background processing a virus.
> > I disagree. I see nothing about "a single-user OS without
On 24 October 2016 at 20:20, Cameron Kaiser wrote:
> - Yes, classic Macs did get viruses. But as a user of a classic Mac since
> 1987, I think I encountered one exactly once and my experience was not
> unusual. They just weren't all that common and nearly everyone ran
On 24 October 2016 at 18:58, wrote:
> Software selection for MacOS was pretty crappy, and it was hard to get under
> the hood.
That's not my experience, TBH. Big, great S/W range, shareware and PD,
hard_er_ but still possible to get under the hood.
--
Liam Proven • Profile:
On 24 October 2016 at 04:03, allison wrote:
> Its highly unlikely as first it would have to install itself and do so
> without corrupting the OS.
> CP/M-80 is a machine monitor with a file system and lacking most of the
> usual
> read the disk and "do something" automation.
On 24 October 2016 at 03:15, Mouse wrote:
>
> I disagree. I see nothing about "a single-user OS without background
> processing" that would prevent a virus from infecting other programs,
> even including the OS, when it's run, and potentially doing something
> else as
On 23 October 2016 at 19:12, Fred Cisin wrote:
> But, I was explicitly referring to the time BEFORE OS-X! (<1999?)
Ahh, well, that's entirely fair then.
> Assholes who proclaimed themselves to be "experts" kept pushing our college
> administration to SWITCH ALL of our our
On 23 October 2016 at 18:03, Electronics Plus wrote:
> I used to have factory original CD install disks from Zip drives, but I threw
> them all out, because they were all infected with viruses. Iomega was kind
> enough to send me clean install disks, after I mailed them back
On Mon, 24 Oct 2016, et...@757.org wrote:
I *DO* remember that in the local BBS wars, people who were toying with
MS-DOS viruses would make them then submit them to the AV companies to get
them on "the list." The huge list of viruses that the software would defend
against. But in reality, they
> Early Macs definitely had viruses, a few that I got from thrift stores
> still have the viruses on them. I don't think there is any memory
> protection at all. Software selection for MacOS was pretty crappy, and it
> was hard to get under the hood. So protecting yourself from them would be
>
But, I was explicitly referring to the time BEFORE OS-X! (<1999?)
Assholes who proclaimed themselves to be "experts" kept pushing our college
administration to SWITCH ALL of our our student computer labs from PC to Mac,
mostly using the LIE that "Macs are immune to viruses".
Jumping in here
On 10/23/2016 09:15 PM, Mouse wrote:
>> My favorite formatter was my S100 crate with CP/M, [it's] impossible
>> to give a single user OS without background processing a virus.
> I disagree. I see nothing about "a single-user OS without background
> processing" that would prevent a virus from
On 10/22/2016 01:36 PM, Ali wrote:
>>> I didn't think modern A/V products included complete historical sets
>>> of signatures. I
>>
>> I would certainly expect them to, yes!
>
> Just wondering are you guys not running AV SW on your old HW? I personally
> run period specific AV SW on my older
> My favorite formatter was my S100 crate with CP/M, [it's] impossible
> to give a single user OS without background processing a virus.
I disagree. I see nothing about "a single-user OS without background
processing" that would prevent a virus from infecting other programs,
even including the
>>> [...anti-virus...]
>> [...]
> Just wondering are you guys not running AV SW on your old HW?
I am not.
But then, because of my interests, the old hardware I keep is stuff
like Sun SPARCs that are powerful enough to run a real operating
system. These are (a) inherently invulnerable to most of
-Original Message-
From: cctalk [mailto:cctalk-boun...@classiccmp.org] On Behalf Of Liam Proven
Sent: Sunday, October 23, 2016 9:37 AM
To: General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts
Subject: Re: Archived viruses, was Re: Reasonable price for a complete SOL-20
system?
On 22
On 22 October 2016 at 21:21, Fred Cisin wrote:
> On Sat, 22 Oct 2016, Liam Proven wrote:
>>
>> :-)
>> A good 5-6y or more ago I restored an old Mac Classic II a friend gave
>> me. I got it dual-booting System 6.0.8 and 7.1 and had both of them
>> online via an Asanté EtherSCSI
On 22/10/16 20:21, Fred Cisin wrote:
> But "Marketing" convinced the public that Macs were IMMUNE TO GETTING
> VIRUSES!:-)
And "Engineering" (aka some teenager playing on their parents' Mac)
decided to convince Marketing that they were wrong?
And the whole scene unfolds with a tedious
I wouldn't dismiss it if you're using images or any used software. Yes some
platforms are more susceptible than others but unless you have no hard drive,
power your system off after every use, and never switch disks while system is
running it's still something that can infest your originals or
On Sat, 22 Oct 2016, Liam Proven wrote:
:-)
A good 5-6y or more ago I restored an old Mac Classic II a friend gave
me. I got it dual-booting System 6.0.8 and 7.1 and had both of them
online via an Asanté EtherSCSI interface. To do this involved
downloading a lot of ancient Mac software on my B
On 10/21/2016 18:22, william degnan wrote:
>
> Stoned Monk is still detectable by modern anti virus software, 25 or
> whatever years later, at least last time I tested using a win 7 machine.
> So, that was maybe 4 or 5 years ago.
Well, glad to hear there's nothing to worry about. Like I said,
On 10/21/2016 09:43 PM, Fred Cisin wrote:
>
> Certain college administrators declared that every machine that was
> infected would have to be destroyed; "it is impossible to remove the
> virus". Have I mentioned a colleague whom they tried to terminate for
> removing machines from dumpsters?
> At
On Oct 21, 2016 8:30 PM, "Steven M Jones" wrote:
>
> On 10/21/2016 14:15, william degnan wrote:
> > Any disk or archive you come upon from the early 90's should be scanned
for
> > viruses before use on a vintage machine. USe a modern PC as it's no
biggie
> > to clean old
On 22 October 2016 at 19:36, Ali wrote:
>
> Just wondering are you guys not running AV SW on your old HW? I personally
> run period specific AV SW on my older machines. Granted I have mostly IBM
> 51xx series machines and later Macs so AV SW is easier to find.
>
> Since I
> > I didn't think modern A/V products included complete historical sets
> > of signatures. I
>
>
> I would certainly expect them to, yes!
Just wondering are you guys not running AV SW on your old HW? I personally run
period specific AV SW on my older machines. Granted I have mostly IBM 51xx
On 22 October 2016 at 18:54, Terry Stewart wrote:
> My copy of AVG detected the stoned virus on an old floppy on my WinXP
> machine a couple of years ago.
:-)
A good 5-6y or more ago I restored an old Mac Classic II a friend gave
me. I got it dual-booting System 6.0.8
> I used to work for AVG; I can ask if you like.
My copy of AVG detected the stoned virus on an old floppy on my WinXP
machine a couple of years ago.
Terry (Tez)
On 22 October 2016 at 00:05, Steven M Jones wrote:
> I didn't think modern A/V products included complete historical sets of
> signatures. I
I would certainly expect them to, yes!
I used to work for AVG; I can ask if you like. But yes. Also, they
include malware
>
> John McAfee predicted that 5 million computers would be wiped out.
> The press were called in.
>
> On March 6, there were apparently DOZENS of drives wiped. Few, if any
records kept to verify numbers.
> McAfee, as expected, took full credit, and declared that the REASON why
it was dozens,
35 matches
Mail list logo