It was thus said that the Great ben via cctalk once stated:
> On 1/13/2019 2:06 PM, Chuck Guzis via cctalk wrote:
>
> >Being an old hard-of-seeing guy myself, I much prefer mixed-case to
> >all-caps. All caps destroys the "shape" of words.
>
> Where is the $%!@ codepage for the ASR-33. Get all
On 1/13/2019 2:06 PM, Chuck Guzis via cctalk wrote:
Being an old hard-of-seeing guy myself, I much prefer mixed-case to
all-caps. All caps destroys the "shape" of words.
Where is the $%!@ codepage for the ASR-33. Get all caps with a REAL keyboard
and better text (with a new ribbon) than a
On 1/13/19 11:47 AM, Sean Conner via cctalk wrote:
> Yup. He did it intentionally because, as he said, most of his friends
> were hard of seeing, and by using ALL CAPS the letters were bigger and thus,
> easier to read. But the new Chromebook removed the CAPSLOCK key.
>
> The fact that
It was thus said that the Great John Ball via cctalk once stated:
> >ELTRAN THE COMPILER
> >ANY DOCS? ANY ONE? USED IT?
> >(NOT THE SEMICONDUCTOR STUFF!))
> >
> >ED#
>
> Hey ed, you might want to check your Caps Lock key there, bud. ;)
My dad used to do that. At the time, I thought it was
On Sun, 13 Jan 2019, Peter Cetinski via cctalk wrote:
On Jan 13, 2019, at 1:32 PM, John Ball via cctalk wrote:
ELTRAN THE COMPILER
ANY DOCS? ANY ONE? USED IT?
(NOT THE SEMICONDUCTOR STUFF!))
ED#
Hey ed, you might want to check your Caps Lock key there, bud. ;)
Maybe he’s using a
> On Jan 13, 2019, at 1:32 PM, John Ball via cctalk
> wrote:
>
>> ELTRAN THE COMPILER
>> ANY DOCS? ANY ONE? USED IT?
>> (NOT THE SEMICONDUCTOR STUFF!))
>>
>> ED#
>
> Hey ed, you might want to check your Caps Lock key there, bud. ;)
Maybe he’s using a TRS-80 without the lowercase
>ELTRAN THE COMPILER
>ANY DOCS? ANY ONE? USED IT?
>(NOT THE SEMICONDUCTOR STUFF!))
>
>ED#
Hey ed, you might want to check your Caps Lock key there, bud. ;)
At 12:10 PM 1/5/2019, Chuck Guzis via cctalk wrote:
>Okay, I think I found the reference to it.
>
>It turns out that it was a high-school student's project entered in the
>"Fourth Annual Computer Programming Contest for Grades 7 to 12'. To quote:
>
>"The 1966 winner was William J. Elliott, a 12th
Chuck! Many thanks!
Update on 422 UNIVAC docs . . some kind people have mailed in docs and
things they have found related to this 422 UNIVAC ... things are shaping
up! Many thanks to all these folks-
I fear ever putting power to this thing... so may parts to go POP... I
(COME ON SOCRATES ... DO YOUR THING!)
In a message dated 1/5/2019 1:49:38 AM US Mountain Standard Time,
cctalk@classiccmp.org writes:
no is compiler a small one only 2 do loops allowed...ed#
Sent from AOL Mobile MailOn Friday, January 4, 2019 Chuck Guzis via cctalk
wrote:On 1/4/19 8:42 PM,
Since it was a 53-year old high-school project, I doubt that you're
going to find much on it. However, see the post by Steve Schweda here:
https://community.hpe.com/t5/Operating-System-OpenVMS/Left-shift-by-more-than-32-bits-gt-undefined-in-DEC-C/td-p/5054212
He may actually have some
Okay, I think I found the reference to it.
It turns out that it was a high-school student's project entered in the
"Fourth Annual Computer Programming Contest for Grades 7 to 12'. To quote:
"The 1966 winner was William J. Elliott, a 12th grade student at West
High School in Minneapolis. His
no is compiler a small one only 2 do loops allowed...ed#
Sent from AOL Mobile Mail
On Friday, January 4, 2019 Chuck Guzis via cctalk wrote:
On 1/4/19 8:42 PM, Fred Cisin via cctalk wrote:
> Would be interesting when you find it.
> Not necessarily "tiny"
> Remember WATFOR? (very impressive!)
On 1/4/19 8:42 PM, Fred Cisin via cctalk wrote:
> Would be interesting when you find it.
> Not necessarily "tiny"
> Remember WATFOR? (very impressive!)
I guesss not too many numerical methods types hwere, but ELTRAN is a
subroutine in the EISPACK linear programming set. Yes, it's all FORTRAN:
Would be interesting when you find it.
Not necessarily "tiny"
Remember WATFOR? (very impressive!)
I had a lot of fun with PDQ FORTRAN on 1620.
. . . and, my reply was meant in jest. You are nothing like the fellow
who told us about Valtrep. (other than the sparcity of Google hits)
--
have no idea but do have a feeling it might have been like a 'tiny fortran'
Sent from AOL Mobile Mail
On Friday, January 4, 2019 Fred Cisin wrote:
On Sat, 5 Jan 2019, ED SHARPE via cctalk wrote:
> ELTRAN THE COMPILER
> ANY DOCS? ANY ONE USED IT?
> (NOT THE SEMICONDUCTOR STUFF!))
Was it one
On Sat, 5 Jan 2019, ED SHARPE via cctalk wrote:
ELTRAN THE COMPILER
ANY DOCS? ANY ONE USED IT?
(NOT THE SEMICONDUCTOR STUFF!))
Was it one of the ones based on Valtrep?
http://www.classiccmp.org/pipermail/cctalk/2017-March/033410.html
--
Grumpy Ol' Fred
17 matches
Mail list logo
