RE: Retro networking / WAN communities

2022-04-15 Thread Dave Mitton via cctech
: Wayne S Subject: Re: Retro networking / WAN communities There is some mention of Token Ring vs Ethernet here. IIRC, One issue that was pointed out was that IBM was the only single source for TR chips so the price of token ring could be kept artificially high. Was there ever a second or third source

Re: Retro networking / WAN communities

2022-04-12 Thread Wayne S via cctech
Totally forgot about ARPANET. Sent from my iPhone > On Apr 12, 2022, at 11:47, Will Cooke via cctech > wrote: > >  > >> On 04/12/2022 12:42 PM Wayne S via cctech wrote: >> >> >> Thanks for the info about IMP. >> But now i’d have to question IMP routers being around in 1970 since the

Re: Retro networking / WAN communities

2022-04-12 Thread Will Cooke via cctech
> On 04/12/2022 12:42 PM Wayne S via cctech wrote: > > > Thanks for the info about IMP. > But now i’d have to question IMP routers being around in 1970 since the > internet wasn’t around yet. > > The first response of "Interface" Message Processor is more correct. There was a LOT of

Re: Retro networking / WAN communities

2022-04-12 Thread Craig Ruff via cctech
> I'm running into issues with switches not supporting 10 / 100 Mbps management > interfaces for other equipment. Half duplex was apparently deprecated a few years back, and recent switches from Cisco (and probably other vendors) no longer support half duplex. We ran into this at work for long

Re: Retro networking / WAN communities

2022-04-11 Thread Andrew Back via cctech
On 11/04/2022 18:02, Grant Taylor via cctech wrote: > Does anyone know of any communities / mailing lists / newsgroups / et > al. for retro networking / WAN technologies? > > I find myself interested in (at least) the following and would like to > find others with similar (dis)interests to chat