Re: [Cdk-user] Fwd: CDKPsearch speed

2015-04-29 Thread Tim Dudgeon
Nice! Is there any information available about the methodology involved and on the details (not xml schema) of the pharmacophore definition file? Tim On 28/04/2015 23:34, Rajarshi Guha wrote: I recently updated the CDK pharmacophore search tool (https://github.com/rajarshi/cdkpcore) and got

[Cdk-user] Fwd: Fwd: CDKPsearch speed

2015-04-29 Thread John M
Also useful for others.. -- Forwarded message -- From: John M john.wilkinson...@gmail.com Date: 29 April 2015 at 10:10 Subject: Re: [Cdk-user] Fwd: CDKPsearch speed To: Rajarshi Guha rajarshi.g...@gmail.com Great to hear - ​lots more to come of course. Some points for an extra

Re: [Cdk-user] Fwd: CDKPsearch speed

2015-04-29 Thread Egon Willighagen
Oh, and with a few electrons it again became a difficult question... Darn... I really thought we had them archived all there :/ Will do some digging! Egon On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 2:50 PM, Rajarshi Guha rajarshi.g...@gmail.com wrote: Unfortunately, the pharmacophore article is in a 2008

Re: [Cdk-user] Fwd: CDKPsearch speed

2015-04-29 Thread Rajarshi Guha
The pharmacophore matching was described in a CDK News issue - but all the links I have seem to be dead. It's very simplistic in fact - pharmacophore query atoms and bonds are defined as subclasses of SMARTS atoms and bonds. The query is parsed into a pharmacophore molecule and then a match is

Re: [Cdk-user] Fwd: CDKPsearch speed

2015-04-29 Thread Rajarshi Guha
Unfortunately, the pharmacophore article is in a 2008 issue. That link only shows up to 2007 On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 8:47 AM, Egon Willighagen egon.willigha...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 2:39 PM, Rajarshi Guha rajarshi.g...@gmail.com wrote: Egon/Chris - do we have old versions