Re: [Cdk-user] [Cdk-devel] Preserving public API

John, all, On Thu, Dec 31, 2015 at 12:21 PM, John M wrote: > Is the approach of adding new API and deprecate the old sound acceptable? Or > are public API changes acceptable? In general I think keeping APIs is a good thing, also for development branches. I think

[Cdk-user] Preserving public API

Hi all, Wanted a quick poll of thoughts on API changes. CDK does/has gone with the linux kernal style versioning (which they actually dropped in 2003) on odd numbers for unstable (dev version) and even numbers for stable (e.g. 1.4.x=stable,1.5.x=unstable). I've been making an effort in 1.5.x to

Re: [Cdk-user] [Cdk-devel] Preserving public API

On Thu, Dec 31, 2015 at 6:21 AM, John M wrote: > > Is the approach of adding new API and deprecate the old sound acceptable? > Or are public API changes acceptable? > I'd vote for the first approach - add new API, but mark the old one as deprecated. At one point the