Re: License issue?

2005-08-18 Thread Greg Wooledge
On Thu, Aug 18, 2005 at 07:43:59PM +0100, Alvaro Lopez Ortega wrote: === Version 5.6 adds support for Solaris 2.x [commercial licensing terms for distribution on Solaris are to be settled with Inserve Technology]. === I am wondering how is it possible to this be compatible with the GPL

Re: License issue?

2005-08-18 Thread Joerg Schilling
Alvaro Lopez Ortega [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi all, I have been reading the dvd+rw-tools FAQ and I have found this in there: === Version 5.6 adds support for Solaris 2.x [commercial licensing terms for distribution on Solaris are to be settled with Inserve Technology]. === As

Re: License issue?

2005-08-18 Thread Joerg Schilling
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, Andy (i guess) states on http://fy.chalmers.se/~appro/linux/DVD+RW/solaris.com.html --- Clarification Note Commercial licensing terms for distribution on Solaris means that if a 3rd

Re: Do snapshots solve all consistency problems ?

2005-08-18 Thread Joerg Schilling
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: From http://www.tldp.org/HOWTO/LVM-HOWTO/snapshots_backup.html : # lvcreate -L592M -s -n dbbackup /dev/ops/databases ... lvcreate -- logical volume /dev/ops/dbbackup successfully created Maybe one should donate them a paragraph about known pitfalls. They

Do snapshots solve all consistency problems ?

2005-08-18 Thread scdbackup
Hi, Joerg Schilling wrote: I am realisticnot optimistic. Yeah. And sometimes you are quite hard to the users. :)) I think we exchanged our opinions about that topic sufficiently. There are more and other issues to tackle. Btw, star-users@ got a new subscriber and a new user request.