On Friday 27 January 2006 06:03, Bill Davidsen wrote:
I just did a DVD-R this morning with a Pioneer drive, as a test of the
6.0 version. The report is:
INQUIRY:[PIONEER ][DVD-RW DVR-104 ][1.40]
GET [CURRENT] CONFIGURATION:
Mounted Media: 11h, DVD-R Sequential
Bill Davidsen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This sounds a bit confused. Are you able to describe your concern?
You said star doesn't run as fast on Linux as Solaris, you can probably
fix that problem by using O_DIRECT, so the writes and reads don't
compete for the same buffer memory.
And I
Bill Davidsen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My belief is that if O_DIRECT is in the kernel headers it works. I would
love to have time to test timing of O_DIRECT on (a) disk, (b) partition,
(c) file on disk, and alignment on minimal vs. page size boundaries.
Doing O_DIRECT writes of anything
Joerg Schilling [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Bill Davidsen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This sounds a bit confused. Are you able to describe your concern?
You said star doesn't run as fast on Linux as Solaris, you can probably
fix that problem by using O_DIRECT, so the writes and reads don't
Joerg Schilling wrote:
Bill Davidsen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My belief is that if O_DIRECT is in the kernel headers it works. I would
love to have time to test timing of O_DIRECT on (a) disk, (b) partition,
(c) file on disk, and alignment on minimal vs. page size boundaries.
Doing
Matthias Andree wrote:
Joerg Schilling [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Bill Davidsen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This sounds a bit confused. Are you able to describe your concern?
You said star doesn't run as fast on Linux as Solaris, you can probably
fix that problem by using
Matthias Andree [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You said star doesn't run as fast on Linux as Solaris, you can probably
fix that problem by using O_DIRECT, so the writes and reads don't
compete for the same buffer memory.
And I already mentioned that it is higly improbable that O_DIRECT will
7 matches
Mail list logo
