On Sat 21 August 2004 21:17, Albert Cahalan wrote:
> On Sat, 2004-08-21 at 17:19, Lourens Veen wrote:
> > On Sat 21 August 2004 18:06, Albert Cahalan wrote:
> That makes "dd if=/dev/FancyName" work, and in fact
> is exactly what the Linux "udev" program set
On Sat 21 August 2004 18:06, Albert Cahalan wrote:
> On Sat, 2004-08-21 at 14:28, Joerg Schilling wrote:
> >
> > Check the man page of cdrecord for a decription of the features
> > that are handled by /etc/default/cdrecord
>
> Hmmm, that's pretty good.
>
> Do you think you could make all the other
On Thu 19 August 2004 14:35, Joerg Schilling wrote:
> From: Volker Kuhlmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> >Obviously you're on the back foot and ran out of arguments,
> > otherwise you wouldn't spend a whole email on discussing a
> > minor point (so I didn't check my PPS carefully enough) and
> > nothing
On Thu 19 August 2004 07:51, Jacob Meuser wrote:
>
> I doubt any government regards the GPL as an entity, so the GPL
> has no rights. the GPL is a contract; following the GPL gives
> entities rights. SuSE can release a really buggy version of
> anything covered by the GPL, as long as they are comp
On Fri 13 August 2004 21:21, Mike 'Fox' Morrey wrote:
> Sorry, my bad. Misunderstood.
> I don't mean *ADD* it to an image, but simply REPORT it when the
> image is finished...
>
> And example of what I do daily..:
> mkisofs -J -R -V toolbox#0327 -v -split-output -o
> /usr/image/ar
On Mon 9 August 2004 21:41, Carsten Neumann wrote:
> On Mon, 09 Aug 2004, Joerg Schilling wrote:
>
> > Just read the OSTA UDF documents.
>
> It is not helpful to post such comments without an appropriate
> link.
Try typing OSTA UDF documents into Google. www.osta.org seems to be
down, but otherwi
On Thu 15 July 2004 16:50, Ashish Rangole wrote:
> I usually calculate the md5sum of the iso image before
> writing it to the disc. After successful write I use
> readcd to read the iso image back, calculate its md5sum
> and compare.
But that doesn't give you any quality information does it? And t
On Thu 15 July 2004 14:20, Oliver Schuetz wrote:
> HI,
>
> I would like to know which tools are out there to verify burned
> CD's/DVD's and which tools or ways are out there for linux to see
> what quality my burned media is. I can verify a burned media with
> "cmp". But this doesn't give any infor
On Thu 3 June 2004 01:33, martin laurberg wrote:
> Dear All,
> Has anyone got a Plextor PX-708A working under linux?
> I followed the Thomas Chungs instructions on
> http://www.xcdroast.org/ for using xcdroast with
> cdrecord.ProDVD but without success. The plextor takes
> both DVD-R and DVD+R. I t
On Wed 21 April 2004 09:24, Helmut Jarausch wrote:
> On 21 Apr, Joerg Schilling wrote:
> > The files are located on:
> >
> > ftp://ftp.berlios.de/pub/cdrecord/alpha ...
>
> Am I the only one having problems to access this site?
> I get "421 Service not available, remote server has closed
> connecti
On Wed 21 April 2004 09:24, Helmut Jarausch wrote:
> On 21 Apr, Joerg Schilling wrote:
> > The files are located on:
> >
> > ftp://ftp.berlios.de/pub/cdrecord/alpha ...
>
> Am I the only one having problems to access this site?
> I get "421 Service not available, remote server has closed
> connecti
On Wed 24 March 2004 23:18, chen zhao wrote:
> Andy,
> Can you please explain what happened, thanks in advance, Chen
You create a disk with growISOfs, and then try to mount it as a UDF
filesystem. That's not going to work. growisofs makes ISO9660
filesystems, so you should mount with -t iso966
On Wed 24 March 2004 23:18, chen zhao wrote:
> Andy,
> Can you please explain what happened, thanks in advance, Chen
You create a disk with growISOfs, and then try to mount it as a UDF
filesystem. That's not going to work. growisofs makes ISO9660
filesystems, so you should mount with -t iso966
On Tue 16 March 2004 02:03, Ashish Rangole wrote:
> I have a SGI IRIX 6.5 system with external DVD writer capable of
> burning DVD+RW and DVD-RW media. This device is connected as SCSI
> device through a SCSI HBA.
>
> I would like to know what software is available if I want to :-
> 1. Write CD-R,D
On Tue 16 March 2004 02:03, Ashish Rangole wrote:
> I have a SGI IRIX 6.5 system with external DVD writer capable of
> burning DVD+RW and DVD-RW media. This device is connected as SCSI
> device through a SCSI HBA.
>
> I would like to know what software is available if I want to :-
> 1. Write CD-R,D
On Mon 15 March 2004 22:38, Andy Polyakov wrote:
>
> P.S. Someone among subscribers of this list volunteered to
> collect information and contribute better instructions:-)
That was me, it's still in the todo queue. I've got about twelve
other things to worry about right now but I'll try and do so
On Mon 15 March 2004 22:38, Andy Polyakov wrote:
>
> P.S. Someone among subscribers of this list volunteered to
> collect information and contribute better instructions:-)
That was me, it's still in the todo queue. I've got about twelve
other things to worry about right now but I'll try and do so
On Mon 8 March 2004 19:05, Michael Mess wrote:
> This is the last output from writing a DVD:
>
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:~>uname -a
> Linux rakete 2.2.20 #21 SMP Sat Jan 24 22:02:53 CET 2004 i686
> unknown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:~>
>
> I compiled dvd+rw-tools-5.17.4.8.6 with kernel-headers of
> linux.2.4.
On Mon 8 March 2004 19:05, Michael Mess wrote:
> This is the last output from writing a DVD:
>
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:~>uname -a
> Linux rakete 2.2.20 #21 SMP Sat Jan 24 22:02:53 CET 2004 i686
> unknown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:~>
>
> I compiled dvd+rw-tools-5.17.4.8.6 with kernel-headers of
> linux.2.4.
On Wed 3 March 2004 14:07, Joerg Schilling wrote:
> From: Lourens Veen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> >> WRONG -> RTFM
> >> ftp://ftp.berlios.de/pub/cdrecord/ProDVD/README
> >
> >I just read that document, and I'm curious what exactly is
> &g
On Wed 3 March 2004 14:09, Joerg Schilling wrote:
> From: Warly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> >scanbus will also display dev=ATA scanning if no dev option is
> > passed on the command line, mostly because we are defaulting on
> > ide-cd with 2.6 linux kernel.
>
> Another attempt to break portability of p
On Wed 3 March 2004 14:04, Joerg Schilling wrote:
>
> If you don't understand that you get a valuable piece of software
> and don't like to even do simple tests, then you are just the
> kind of person nobody likes to get in contact with. But then you
> should be consistent and stay away from this m
On Wed 3 March 2004 14:07, Joerg Schilling wrote:
> From: Lourens Veen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> >> WRONG -> RTFM
> >> ftp://ftp.berlios.de/pub/cdrecord/ProDVD/README
> >
> >I just read that document, and I'm curious what exactly is
> &g
On Wed 3 March 2004 14:09, Joerg Schilling wrote:
> From: Warly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> >scanbus will also display dev=ATA scanning if no dev option is
> > passed on the command line, mostly because we are defaulting on
> > ide-cd with 2.6 linux kernel.
>
> Another attempt to break portability of p
On Wed 3 March 2004 14:04, Joerg Schilling wrote:
>
> If you don't understand that you get a valuable piece of software
> and don't like to even do simple tests, then you are just the
> kind of person nobody likes to get in contact with. But then you
> should be consistent and stay away from this m
On Tue 2 March 2004 17:10, Joerg Schilling wrote:
> From: Jon Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> >> WRONG
> >
> >No need to shout, Joerg.
>
> It is: see below.
>
> >If I want to burn more than 1G, I have to get a time limted,
> > usage restricted key from you. It's your right to license it
> > like
On Tue 2 March 2004 17:10, Joerg Schilling wrote:
> From: Jon Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> >> WRONG
> >
> >No need to shout, Joerg.
>
> It is: see below.
>
> >If I want to burn more than 1G, I have to get a time limted,
> > usage restricted key from you. It's your right to license it
> > like
On Mon 1 March 2004 16:23, Joerg Schilling wrote:
> From: Rob Bogus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> >The alternative would be to group them by function, such as
> > putting things which affect the device (dev=, speed=, burnfree,
> > etc) in one group, things which affect format (-D -R -N, etc)
> > in anoth
On Mon 1 March 2004 16:23, Joerg Schilling wrote:
> From: Rob Bogus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> >The alternative would be to group them by function, such as
> > putting things which affect the device (dev=, speed=, burnfree,
> > etc) in one group, things which affect format (-D -R -N, etc)
> > in anoth
On Sat 31 January 2004 22:46, Volker Kuhlmann wrote:
> > > >What I meant was those autothingies should keep their hands
> > > > off a disk while a burn process is happening. Dunno whether
> > > > it's possible to detect this, but isn't that the way it
> > > > should be?
> > >
> > > The burner softw
On Sat 31 January 2004 22:46, Volker Kuhlmann wrote:
> > > >What I meant was those autothingies should keep their hands
> > > > off a disk while a burn process is happening. Dunno whether
> > > > it's possible to detect this, but isn't that the way it
> > > > should be?
> > >
> > > The burner softw
On Sat 31 January 2004 16:30, Rob Bogus wrote:
> Volker Kuhlmann wrote:
> >What I meant was those autothingies should keep their hands off
> > a disk while a burn process is happening. Dunno whether it's
> > possible to detect this, but isn't that the way it should be?
>
> The burner software can o
On Sat 31 January 2004 16:30, Rob Bogus wrote:
> Volker Kuhlmann wrote:
> >What I meant was those autothingies should keep their hands off
> > a disk while a burn process is happening. Dunno whether it's
> > possible to detect this, but isn't that the way it should be?
>
> The burner software can o
On Tue 27 January 2004 11:16, Lourens Veen wrote:
> On Tue 27 January 2004 08:06, Lourens Veen wrote:
> > Then there is autofs
> > (http://freshmeat.net/projects/autofs/?topic_id=142, can't find
> > a real homepage) and KDE uses fam
> > (http://oss.sgi.com/projects/
On Tue 27 January 2004 11:16, Lourens Veen wrote:
> On Tue 27 January 2004 08:06, Lourens Veen wrote:
> > Then there is autofs
> > (http://freshmeat.net/projects/autofs/?topic_id=142, can't find
> > a real homepage) and KDE uses fam
> > (http://oss.sgi.com/projects/
On Thu 29 January 2004 12:34, Joerg Schilling wrote:
> From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jan 28 21:01:50 2004
>
> >Is there any way at all to check whether a CD is being written
> >without disturbing the writing process?
>
> NO, if you like to check for a media change you need to access
> the TOC.
Thank
On Thu 29 January 2004 12:34, Joerg Schilling wrote:
> From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jan 28 21:01:50 2004
>
> >Is there any way at all to check whether a CD is being written
> >without disturbing the writing process?
>
> NO, if you like to check for a media change you need to access
> the TOC.
Thank
On Wed 28 January 2004 16:07, Joerg Schilling wrote:
> From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Jan 27 21:08:37 2004
>
> >Aha, thanks for explaining that. This does pose a bit of a
> > problem though if you have both: say I insert a CD, then the
> > volume manager sees it and mounts it. Then I go to my magic
>
On Wed 28 January 2004 16:07, Joerg Schilling wrote:
> From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Jan 27 21:08:37 2004
>
> >Aha, thanks for explaining that. This does pose a bit of a
> > problem though if you have both: say I insert a CD, then the
> > volume manager sees it and mounts it. Then I go to my magic
>
On Wed 28 January 2004 00:28, Volker Kuhlmann wrote:
> > or whatever. Then when the user actually opens the drive, the
> > automounter kicks in and it is mounted.
>
> In this case, you simply don't need an automounter, and SuSE
> shows that nicely. User wants to open hard disk? -> Click
> harddisk
On Wed 28 January 2004 00:28, Volker Kuhlmann wrote:
> > or whatever. Then when the user actually opens the drive, the
> > automounter kicks in and it is mounted.
>
> In this case, you simply don't need an automounter, and SuSE
> shows that nicely. User wants to open hard disk? -> Click
> harddisk
On Tue 27 January 2004 21:41, Robert S. Dubinski wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 27, 2004 at 03:10:42PM -0500, Ambrose Li wrote:
> > Yes, myself is to blame for not checking the updated FHS. But
> > why would anyone upgrading from libc5 to libc6 suspect that a
> > change in the FHS should affect the upgrade (
On Tue 27 January 2004 21:25, Joerg Schilling wrote:
> From: Lourens Veen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> >Well, first there was cdrecord, which is GPL. Then DVD writers
> >appeared, and someone adapted cdrecord to be able to record to
> > his DVD drive, and called it
On Tue 27 January 2004 21:41, Robert S. Dubinski wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 27, 2004 at 03:10:42PM -0500, Ambrose Li wrote:
> > Yes, myself is to blame for not checking the updated FHS. But
> > why would anyone upgrading from libc5 to libc6 suspect that a
> > change in the FHS should affect the upgrade (
On Tue 27 January 2004 12:06, Joerg Schilling wrote:
> From: Lourens Veen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> >"Package: magicdev (1.1.5-1)
> >A GNOME daemon for automatically mounting/playing CDs
> >
> >Magicdev is a daemon that runs within the GNOME environme
On Tue 27 January 2004 21:25, Joerg Schilling wrote:
> From: Lourens Veen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> >Well, first there was cdrecord, which is GPL. Then DVD writers
> >appeared, and someone adapted cdrecord to be able to record to
> > his DVD drive, and called it
On Tue 27 January 2004 20:11, Thomas J Magliery PhD wrote:
>
> You might recall from my first emails that I was also getting
> this error from within xcdroast, which used the (same) authentic
> binary from your site. I didn't realize that the command line
> used the RLH9 RPM installation of dvdrec
On Tue 27 January 2004 12:06, Joerg Schilling wrote:
> From: Lourens Veen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> >"Package: magicdev (1.1.5-1)
> >A GNOME daemon for automatically mounting/playing CDs
> >
> >Magicdev is a daemon that runs within the GNOME environme
On Tue 27 January 2004 20:11, Thomas J Magliery PhD wrote:
>
> You might recall from my first emails that I was also getting
> this error from within xcdroast, which used the (same) authentic
> binary from your site. I didn't realize that the command line
> used the RLH9 RPM installation of dvdrec
On Tue 27 January 2004 08:06, Lourens Veen wrote:
>
> Then there is autofs
> (http://freshmeat.net/projects/autofs/?topic_id=142, can't find a
> real homepage) and KDE uses fam
> (http://oss.sgi.com/projects/fam/), however I don't think fam
> actually mounts device
On Tue 27 January 2004 08:06, Lourens Veen wrote:
>
> Then there is autofs
> (http://freshmeat.net/projects/autofs/?topic_id=142, can't find a
> real homepage) and KDE uses fam
> (http://oss.sgi.com/projects/fam/), however I don't think fam
> actually mounts device
On Tue 27 January 2004 00:51, Joerg Schilling wrote:
> From: Lourens Veen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> >On Fri 23 January 2004 20:39, Thomas J Magliery PhD wrote:
> >> Joerg, I only can detect one message in single-user mode, an
On Tue 27 January 2004 00:51, Joerg Schilling wrote:
> From: Lourens Veen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> >On Fri 23 January 2004 20:39, Thomas J Magliery PhD wrote:
> >> Joerg, I only can detect one message in single-user mode, an
On Fri 23 January 2004 20:39, Thomas J Magliery PhD wrote:
> Joerg, I only can detect one message in single-user mode, and
> it's not too helpful:
>
>
> Jan 23 14:23:09 reganlinux kernel: cdrom: This disc doesn't have
> any tracks I recognize!
> Jan 23 14:23:40 reganlin
On Fri 23 January 2004 20:39, Thomas J Magliery PhD wrote:
> Joerg, I only can detect one message in single-user mode, and
> it's not too helpful:
>
>
> Jan 23 14:23:09 reganlinux kernel: cdrom: This disc doesn't have
> any tracks I recognize!
> Jan 23 14:23:40 reganlin
On Sun 25 January 2004 20:55, Joerg Schilling wrote:
>
> If somebody is interested in getting a description of the usual
> way to deal with dependencies on kernel/user interfaces and the
> resulting contraints, I am willing to send one. As I got the
> impression that this discussion has been alread
On Sun 25 January 2004 20:55, Joerg Schilling wrote:
>
> If somebody is interested in getting a description of the usual
> way to deal with dependencies on kernel/user interfaces and the
> resulting contraints, I am willing to send one. As I got the
> impression that this discussion has been alread
On Sat 24 January 2004 21:17, jeff beck wrote:
> I'm sure I am doing something wrong and am only
> allowing myself to get yelled at by Mr. Schilling by
> posting, but I can't seem to write CD-R's successfully
> with my new Plextor PX-708A. I am using SONY CD-R
> 80's which are 32 speed.
>
> Nearly
On Sat 24 January 2004 21:17, jeff beck wrote:
> I'm sure I am doing something wrong and am only
> allowing myself to get yelled at by Mr. Schilling by
> posting, but I can't seem to write CD-R's successfully
> with my new Plextor PX-708A. I am using SONY CD-R
> 80's which are 32 speed.
>
> Nearly
On Sat 17 January 2004 15:19, j_post wrote:
> On Saturday 17 January 2004 04:39 am, Joerg Schilling wrote:
> > People who used Xcdroast once, mostly don't like to use other
> > GUIs anymore.
>
> Is that because Xcdroast is somehow "better" than the other GUIs,
> or just because people tend to think
On Sat 17 January 2004 15:19, j_post wrote:
> On Saturday 17 January 2004 04:39 am, Joerg Schilling wrote:
> > People who used Xcdroast once, mostly don't like to use other
> > GUIs anymore.
>
> Is that because Xcdroast is somehow "better" than the other GUIs,
> or just because people tend to think
On Thu 8 January 2004 20:10, Scott Bronson wrote:
> Arguing about MAY vs WILL and the proper use of a colon
> is just a waste of time don't you think? How does any
> of this noticeably impact _your_ life?
Well, the original statement was false (at least IMHO, it seems we
disagree a bit, about wh
On Thu 8 January 2004 20:10, Scott Bronson wrote:
> Arguing about MAY vs WILL and the proper use of a colon
> is just a waste of time don't you think? How does any
> of this noticeably impact _your_ life?
Well, the original statement was false (at least IMHO, it seems we
disagree a bit, about wh
On Thu 8 January 2004 18:42, Matthias Schniedermeyer wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 08, 2004 at 05:37:33PM +0100, Lourens Veen wrote:
> > On Thu 8 January 2004 17:07, Matthias Schniedermeyer wrote:
> > > On Thu, Jan 08, 2004 at 04:24:22PM +0100, Joerg Schilling
wrote:
> > > >
On Thu 8 January 2004 18:42, Matthias Schniedermeyer wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 08, 2004 at 05:37:33PM +0100, Lourens Veen wrote:
> > On Thu 8 January 2004 17:07, Matthias Schniedermeyer wrote:
> > > On Thu, Jan 08, 2004 at 04:24:22PM +0100, Joerg Schilling
wrote:
> > > >
On Thu 8 January 2004 17:07, Matthias Schniedermeyer wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 08, 2004 at 04:24:22PM +0100, Joerg Schilling wrote:
> > It _is_ wrong to assume that a random program compiled for OS
> > revision A will run correctly on OS revision B
>
> Definetly NOT.
>
> e.g. "grep".
Aaargh!
Perhaps w
On Thu 8 January 2004 16:24, Joerg Schilling wrote:
> From: Lourens Veen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> >No, you did not. You said, and I quote (module formatting):
> >
> >"It has _always_ been wrong to compile software only once for
> >different kernel versi
On Thu 8 January 2004 17:07, Matthias Schniedermeyer wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 08, 2004 at 04:24:22PM +0100, Joerg Schilling wrote:
> > It _is_ wrong to assume that a random program compiled for OS
> > revision A will run correctly on OS revision B
>
> Definetly NOT.
>
> e.g. "grep".
Aaargh!
Perhaps w
On Thu 8 January 2004 16:24, Joerg Schilling wrote:
> From: Lourens Veen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> >No, you did not. You said, and I quote (module formatting):
> >
> >"It has _always_ been wrong to compile software only once for
> >different kernel versi
On Thu 8 January 2004 13:59, Joerg Schilling wrote:
> From: Lourens Veen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> >On Wed 7 January 2004 17:49, Jens Seidel wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> PS: If you reply to this mail I'm willing to help polishing
> >> your webs
On Thu 8 January 2004 13:47, Joerg Schilling wrote:
> From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jan 7 16:34:14 2004
>
> >> If you unpack this on a Linux-2.6 system using a "star" binary
> >> that has been compiled on Linux-2.4, you will extract a
> >> character special with minor 88 instead of minor 7000.
> >>
On Thu 8 January 2004 13:59, Joerg Schilling wrote:
> From: Lourens Veen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> >On Wed 7 January 2004 17:49, Jens Seidel wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> PS: If you reply to this mail I'm willing to help polishing
> >> your webs
On Thu 8 January 2004 13:47, Joerg Schilling wrote:
> From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jan 7 16:34:14 2004
>
> >> If you unpack this on a Linux-2.6 system using a "star" binary
> >> that has been compiled on Linux-2.4, you will extract a
> >> character special with minor 88 instead of minor 7000.
> >>
On Wed 7 January 2004 17:49, Jens Seidel wrote:
> Hi,
>
> PS: If you reply to this mail I'm willing to help polishing your
> website. Most of your .html files look weird! (Is .html or sgml,
> ... the source of it?)
Have a look at http://cdrecord.berlios.de/test/
That's what I built a while ago, b
On Wed 7 January 2004 17:49, Jens Seidel wrote:
> Hi,
>
> PS: If you reply to this mail I'm willing to help polishing your
> website. Most of your .html files look weird! (Is .html or sgml,
> ... the source of it?)
Have a look at http://cdrecord.berlios.de/test/
That's what I built a while ago, b
On Wed 7 January 2004 11:37, Joerg Schilling wrote:
>
> For all people who have enough background knowledge in software
> engineering, here is a text that I did write for another purpose:
>
> /*---
>---*/
>
> star -tv < /tmp/cdev.t
On Wed 7 January 2004 11:37, Joerg Schilling wrote:
>
> For all people who have enough background knowledge in software
> engineering, here is a text that I did write for another purpose:
>
> /*---
>---*/
>
> star -tv < /tmp/cdev.t
On Sun 28 December 2003 13:03, Mihai Florescu wrote:
> Hi,
>
>The problem is that the cd-rw can't copy from a cd to hard
> disk anything. This happens only in Windows XP. Strange is that
> in XP can write to a cd without any trouble.
>I don't know what to do. I tried to go to t
On Sun 28 December 2003 13:03, Mihai Florescu wrote:
> Hi,
>
>The problem is that the cd-rw can't copy from a cd to hard
> disk anything. This happens only in Windows XP. Strange is that
> in XP can write to a cd without any trouble.
>I don't know what to do. I tried to go to t
On Thu 18 December 2003 17:38, Geoffrey wrote:
> Andy Polyakov wrote:
> >
> > As it's SANYO/Optorite unit, you probably should keep in mind
> > issues discussed in "Dual format DVD burner drive problem"
> > thread. Summary there is that DVD+RW support (and DVD+RW
> > support only to my best knowled
On Thu 18 December 2003 17:38, Geoffrey wrote:
> Andy Polyakov wrote:
> >
> > As it's SANYO/Optorite unit, you probably should keep in mind
> > issues discussed in "Dual format DVD burner drive problem"
> > thread. Summary there is that DVD+RW support (and DVD+RW
> > support only to my best knowled
On Wed 10 December 2003 22:28, Joerg Schilling wrote:
> From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Dec 10 22:05:42 2003
>
> >> Of course, problems may also be caused by miss usage of
> >> cdrecord by k3b, but if he is interested in k3b problems, he
> >> should ask the authors.
> >
> >Well, incidentally, k3b doesn
On Wed 10 December 2003 22:28, Joerg Schilling wrote:
> From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Dec 10 22:05:42 2003
>
> >> Of course, problems may also be caused by miss usage of
> >> cdrecord by k3b, but if he is interested in k3b problems, he
> >> should ask the authors.
> >
> >Well, incidentally, k3b doesn
On Wed 10 December 2003 20:45, Joerg Schilling wrote:
> From: Lourens Veen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> >On Wed 10 December 2003 17:55, Joerg Schilling wrote:
> >> From: James Lancaster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >>
> >> >Any idea if this is supported
On Wed 10 December 2003 20:45, Joerg Schilling wrote:
> From: Lourens Veen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> >On Wed 10 December 2003 17:55, Joerg Schilling wrote:
> >> From: James Lancaster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >>
> >> >Any idea if this is supported
On Wed 10 December 2003 17:55, Joerg Schilling wrote:
> From: James Lancaster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> >Any idea if this is supported (doesn't seem to be working)
> >DVD-RAM/DVD-R drive (write speed on DVD-R is 1x)
> >currently burns under cdrecord-prodvd but I would like to use it
> > under k3b.
>
On Wed 10 December 2003 17:55, Joerg Schilling wrote:
> From: James Lancaster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> >Any idea if this is supported (doesn't seem to be working)
> >DVD-RAM/DVD-R drive (write speed on DVD-R is 1x)
> >currently burns under cdrecord-prodvd but I would like to use it
> > under k3b.
>
On Wed 10 December 2003 06:15, James Lancaster wrote:
> Any idea if this is supported (doesn't seem to be working)
> DVD-RAM/DVD-R drive (write speed on DVD-R is 1x)
> currently burns under cdrecord-prodvd but I would like to use it
> under k3b.
Well, k3b is just a GUI frontend. It uses dvd+rw-too
On Wed 10 December 2003 06:15, James Lancaster wrote:
> Any idea if this is supported (doesn't seem to be working)
> DVD-RAM/DVD-R drive (write speed on DVD-R is 1x)
> currently burns under cdrecord-prodvd but I would like to use it
> under k3b.
Well, k3b is just a GUI frontend. It uses dvd+rw-too
On Fri 5 December 2003 21:04, Robert Schwede wrote:
> hallo,
> cdrecord hat mir grade gesagt, dass ich Ihnen eine email
> schreiben soll. Es ist der "unbekannte Fehler 254" aufgetreten.
Sorry, this mailinglist is English-only, so I'm going to translate
your question and answer in English. See
ht
On Fri 5 December 2003 21:04, Robert Schwede wrote:
> hallo,
> cdrecord hat mir grade gesagt, dass ich Ihnen eine email
> schreiben soll. Es ist der "unbekannte Fehler 254" aufgetreten.
Sorry, this mailinglist is English-only, so I'm going to translate
your question and answer in English. See
ht
On Mon 1 December 2003 16:26, Joerg Schilling wrote:
> From: Clarence Wilkerson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> >Pardon me. I've missed the discussion of dvdrecord and non GPL
> > compliance.
> >
> >But I was trying out my new Lite-On DVD writer this last weekend
> > ( $80 after rebates at Best Buy ). With
On Mon 1 December 2003 16:26, Joerg Schilling wrote:
> From: Clarence Wilkerson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> >Pardon me. I've missed the discussion of dvdrecord and non GPL
> > compliance.
> >
> >But I was trying out my new Lite-On DVD writer this last weekend
> > ( $80 after rebates at Best Buy ). With
On Fri 28 November 2003 23:24, Ambrose Li wrote:
> Hello,
>
> sorry if this is a stupid question.
>
> I just downloaded cdrtools-2.01a20pre2 to try out its ATAPI
> support. (Linux 2.4's ide-scsi seems to be very broken.)
> I noticed the following:
>
> - cdrecord dev=help says bus scanning is suppor
On Fri 28 November 2003 23:24, Ambrose Li wrote:
> Hello,
>
> sorry if this is a stupid question.
>
> I just downloaded cdrtools-2.01a20pre2 to try out its ATAPI
> support. (Linux 2.4's ide-scsi seems to be very broken.)
> I noticed the following:
>
> - cdrecord dev=help says bus scanning is suppor
On Mon 24 November 2003 13:20, Ole Jacob Taraldset wrote:
> I'm trying to get my LG GSA-4040B attached to a RedHat 8 box burn
> a iso doing "dvdrecord -v dev=0,0,0 -dao -dummy
> /iso/shrike-i386-disc1.iso", but nothing is written and I'm note
> sure what the error is. The disk is a DVD-R.
dvdrecor
On Mon 24 November 2003 13:20, Ole Jacob Taraldset wrote:
> I'm trying to get my LG GSA-4040B attached to a RedHat 8 box burn
> a iso doing "dvdrecord -v dev=0,0,0 -dao -dummy
> /iso/shrike-i386-disc1.iso", but nothing is written and I'm note
> sure what the error is. The disk is a DVD-R.
dvdrecor
On Wed 19 November 2003 10:13, Andy Polyakov wrote:
>
> As pointed out in another thread (look for "Plextor PX-504A can't
> write 2nd session" at
> http://lists.debian.org/cdwrite/2003/cdwrite-200311/threads.html)
> the error code of , or F/FF/FF for that matter,
> "essentially means that t
On Wed 19 November 2003 10:13, Andy Polyakov wrote:
>
> As pointed out in another thread (look for "Plextor PX-504A can't
> write 2nd session" at
> http://lists.debian.org/cdwrite/2003/cdwrite-200311/threads.html)
> the error code of , or F/FF/FF for that matter,
> "essentially means that t
On Tue 18 November 2003 23:22, Volker Kuhlmann wrote:
> > > I can't. xcdroast doesn't recognize non-SCSI devices, that's
> > > why I've switched to SCSI
> >
> > Hmm, and neither does readcd on inspection.
>
> readcd pretty much supports the same device specification as
> cdrecord, which means IDE d
1 - 100 of 185 matches
Mail list logo
