Re: [Cegcc-devel] Needed DLL's

2007-01-17 Thread Cool_Zer0
Ok... I think that the problem is my CeGcc installation... I've used the file that you send me to try to compile exactly like you do... I've edited config.mak to change some paths and then I do a diff.. Here's the result: # diff nuno/config.mak ffmpeg/config.mak 13,16c13,16 < STRIP=/usr/ppl/arm

Re: [Cegcc-devel] Needed DLL's

2007-01-17 Thread Cool_Zer0
Which ffmpeg do you used? I've changed my ./configure to # ./configure --cross-compile --cross-prefix=/usr/ppc/arm-wince-cegcc/bin/ --arch=arm --disable-static --enable-shared --enable-mingwce --disable-ipv6 --prefix=/usr/local/wince --log=yes --disable-encoders --disable-decoders --disable-pa

Re: [Cegcc-devel] Needed DLL's

2007-01-17 Thread Erik van Pienbroek
Op woensdag 17-01-2007 om 21:50 uur [tijdzone +0100], schreef Danny Backx: > On Wed, 2007-01-17 at 00:33 +0100, Erik van Pienbroek wrote: > > (sidenote: the arm-wince-cegcc-dlltool isn't installed by default.. > > I've hacked around in binutils so that this program gets generated) > > Erik, > >

Re: [Cegcc-devel] Needed DLL's

2007-01-17 Thread Danny Backx
On Wed, 2007-01-17 at 00:33 +0100, Erik van Pienbroek wrote: > (sidenote: the arm-wince-cegcc-dlltool isn't installed by default.. > I've hacked around in binutils so that this program gets generated) Erik, I'm not sure I understand this correctly, it does get installed on my system. Can you tel

Re: [Cegcc-devel] Needed DLL's

2007-01-17 Thread Cool_Zer0
Danny Backx wrote: > FYI, on my PDA the combination of Erik's test programs and my DLLs work. > > It's suppose to work if you don't have that problem on the .dll's... I just hope that it works on a MSVC++ project... :) > I've modified the one that failed slightly so it would give me a dial

Re: [Cegcc-devel] Needed DLL's

2007-01-17 Thread Danny Backx
FYI, on my PDA the combination of Erik's test programs and my DLLs work. I've modified the one that failed slightly so it would give me a dialog. http://danny.backx.info/download/erik2.c http://danny.backx.info/download/erik2.exe Danny On Wed, 2007-01-17 at 21:18 +0100, Danny Backx wrot

Re: [Cegcc-devel] Needed DLL's

2007-01-17 Thread Cool_Zer0
Danny Backx wrote: > On Wed, 2007-01-17 at 16:34 +, Cool_Zer0 wrote: > >> On 1/17/07, Cool_Zer0 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Erik van Pienbroek wrote: >> >> > avcodec-51.dll tries to pull in some functions from >> cegcc.dll >> > while these functions

Re: [Cegcc-devel] Needed DLL's

2007-01-17 Thread Danny Backx
On Wed, 2007-01-17 at 16:34 +, Cool_Zer0 wrote: > > > On 1/17/07, Cool_Zer0 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Erik van Pienbroek wrote: > > > avcodec-51.dll tries to pull in some functions from > cegcc.dll > > while these functions are part of avutil-49.dll

Re: [Cegcc-devel] Needed DLL's

2007-01-17 Thread Danny Backx
I sent the message below yesterday but with the .exe file attached normally. The mailing list mailer refused that, so I'm resending it with the exe file gzipped. I haven't read the messages that arrived today well enough to know whether this info still makes a difference. Danny ---

Re: [Cegcc-devel] Needed DLL's

2007-01-17 Thread Cool_Zer0
On 1/17/07, Cool_Zer0 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Erik van Pienbroek wrote: > avcodec-51.dll tries to pull in some functions from cegcc.dll > while these functions are part of avutil-49.dll. > > I don't know if the avcodec-51.dll hasn't been compiled 'the right way' > or if this is a bug in cegc

Re: [Cegcc-devel] Needed DLL's

2007-01-17 Thread Cool_Zer0
> You might want to test if you can use the avutil-49.dll from Visual C++. > It should work (as long as you stay away from avcodec-51.dll). > I'll try it tomorrows at about 9am (GMT time) and the I notify the mailing list. Only with avutil-49.dll is working... Is getting weird each day... --