Carsten Sørensen wrote:
> For instance, would using eVT3 to compile a program that prints out
> the value of any necessary defines be okay? Sounds a bit dodgy to
> me...
>
That would make it very easy, but unfortunately, I don't
thing that is OK.
On the other hand, AFAIK, testing for every pos
Bugs item #1727054, was opened at 2007-05-28 18:43
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by pedroalves
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=865514&aid=1727054&group_id=173455
Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the commen
Bugs item #1727054, was opened at 2007-05-28 20:43
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by surfsmurf
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=865514&aid=1727054&group_id=173455
Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment
Bugs item #1727054, was opened at 2007-05-28 18:43
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by pedroalves
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=865514&aid=1727054&group_id=173455
Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the commen
Bugs item #1727054, was opened at 2007-05-28 20:43
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by surfsmurf
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=865514&aid=1727054&group_id=173455
Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment
Bugs item #1727054, was opened at 2007-05-28 20:43
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by surfsmurf
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=865514&aid=1727054&group_id=173455
Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment
Bugs item #1727054, was opened at 2007-05-28 18:43
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by pedroalves
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=865514&aid=1727054&group_id=173455
Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the commen
On 30/05/07, Carsten Sørensen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> How would I go about reverse engineering the DLL's on the device so I
> can generate .h and .a files I can use? Is there a guide somewhere for
> this? I haven't been able to find anything. The first problem seems to
> be that I can't copy t
Right, on to the next problem.
For my application to run on the (now obsolete, but still lovely) HPC
2000 platform, I need to get the CommandBands_* functions working.
How would I go about reverse engineering the DLL's on the device so I
can generate .h and .a files I can use? Is there a guide so
