On Tue, 03 Feb 2009 20:28:50 +0100, Danny Backx
wrote:
> This one message has answers to questions/remarks from several mails.
>
> On Tue, 2009-02-03 at 14:42 +0100, Vincent R. wrote:
>> I feel a bit alone so Pedro if could take some time to give your opinion
>> it
>> would be great.
>
> That's
This one message has answers to questions/remarks from several mails.
On Tue, 2009-02-03 at 14:42 +0100, Vincent R. wrote:
> I feel a bit alone so Pedro if could take some time to give your opinion it
> would be great.
That's why I really want to put this in a public spot. Others will work
on/wit
I am progressing, I have found why Dll addresses were not good, actually I
started
from i386/mingw32.h and forget to remove the --enable-auto-image-base.
It seems this option is not compatible with our arm architecture ...
I will post a new patch very soon.
On Tue, 03 Feb 2009 09:41:04 +0100, "
Hi Vincent,
On Tue, 3 Feb 2009 00:26:55 +0100 (CET), Vincent Torri
wrote:
> On Mon, 2 Feb 2009, Danny Backx wrote:
>
>> I'm inclined to put this work (based on the current gcc from their svn)
>> in our repository.
>>
>> Upgrading to 4.4.0 once it's out shouldn't be hard.
>>
>> Does anyone have i
