[Cegcc-devel] Rd and Rm should be different in mul?

2012-02-28 Thread James Tyou
Hello There, I compile some c source with \bin>arm-mingw32ce-gcc --version arm-mingw32ce-gcc (GCC) 4.5.3 and switchs: -mcpu=arm1176jzf-s -Wa,-mcpu=arm1176jzf-s but at last it shows some error: ccvEiUjA.s:322: Rd and Rm should be different in mul why? is this a bug of mingw32ce? regards, jz -

Re: [Cegcc-devel] MS COFF obj? DLL only?

2010-07-08 Thread James Tyou
sorry for the last mail, I've confirmed that cegcc really generate coff format obj , which can be linked by MS tools. On Fri, Jul 9, 2010 at 12:50 AM, James Tyou wrote: > -- just add [] in title > > Hi, All, > > First thanks to Cegcc for everything! > > years ago, I u

[Cegcc-devel] MS COFF obj? DLL only?

2010-07-08 Thread James Tyou
-- just add [] in title Hi, All, First thanks to Cegcc for everything! years ago, I use arm-wince-pe to compile c file with inline assembly, produce COFF object file, then link by MS links. but seems the current cegcc toolchain can not produce MS-COFF capabilities file, AM I WRONG? Or, only b

[Cegcc-devel] MS COFF obj? DLL only?

2010-07-08 Thread James Tyou
Hi, All, First thanks to Cegcc for everything! years ago, I use arm-wince-pe to compile c file with inline assembly, produce COFF object file, then link by MS links. but seems the current cegcc toolchain can not produce MS-COFF capabilities file, AM I WRONG? Or, only by building DLL file with

[Cegcc-devel] Old things

2008-06-01 Thread James Tyou
Hi, All, Just wonder what's the difference between arm-wince-pe and cegcc? Regards, James - This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vs

[Cegcc-devel] cegcc vs. mingw32ce

2007-09-27 Thread James Tyou
Hi all, Recently I am porting taglib-1.4 to wince. taglib is written in template c++. I found the test exe which compiled by CEGCC will crash when running to void taglib_tag_free_strings() { if(!stringManagementEnabled) return; for(List::Iterator it = strings.begin(); it != strings.e