Re: [Cegcc-devel] to Danny: about current packages

2008-11-09 Thread Vincent Torri
On Sun, 9 Nov 2008, Danny Backx wrote: > Am I missing something, or is only one file not compliant with your > remark ? i think that: 1) in the libjpeg package, jpeg-6b.tar.bz2, libjpeg-6b-bin.tar.bz2 and libjpeg-6b-dev.tar.bz2 are the old files and the other 3 with -v3 are the newest (check

Re: [Cegcc-devel] to Danny: about current packages

2008-11-09 Thread Danny Backx
Am I missing something, or is only one file not compliant with your remark ? Danny On Sat, 2008-11-08 at 16:04 +0100, Vincent Torri wrote: > Hey Danny, > > I've seen that there are several versions for zlib and libjpeg packages in > SF. Maybe you should remove the old ones and rename th

[Cegcc-devel] to Danny: about current packages

2008-11-08 Thread Vincent Torri
Hey Danny, I've seen that there are several versions for zlib and libjpeg packages in SF. Maybe you should remove the old ones and rename the new ones to following the naming convention: package-version-[src/bin/dev].tar.bz2. that could be disturbing for people who want to get them. thank you