Re: [Cegcc-devel] about definition of struct _finddata_t

2009-08-26 Thread Vincent Torri
On Wed, 26 Aug 2009, Danny Backx wrote: On Wed, 2009-08-26 at 20:26 +0200, Vincent Torri wrote: I think that the same stuff is missing for struct timezone in sys/time.h Something like this ? yes, exactly Vincent Torri Danny pavilion: {1014} svn diff sys/time.h Index: sys/time

Re: [Cegcc-devel] about definition of struct _finddata_t

2009-08-26 Thread Danny Backx
On Wed, 2009-08-26 at 20:26 +0200, Vincent Torri wrote: > I think that the same stuff is missing for struct timezone in sys/time.h Something like this ? Danny pavilion: {1014} svn diff sys/time.h Index: sys/time.h === --- sy

Re: [Cegcc-devel] about definition of struct _finddata_t

2009-08-26 Thread Danny Backx
On Wed, 2009-08-26 at 11:35 +0200, Vincent Torri wrote: > On Tue, 25 Aug 2009, Danny Backx wrote: > > On Sun, 2009-08-23 at 18:18 +0200, Vincent Torri wrote: > >> in io.h, shouldn't struct _finddata_t be guarded by _FINDDATA_T_DEFINED > >> (like _fsize_t is guarded by _FSIZE_T_DEFINED) ? > >> > >>

Re: [Cegcc-devel] about definition of struct _finddata_t

2009-08-26 Thread Vincent Torri
On Wed, 26 Aug 2009, Danny Backx wrote: > On Wed, 2009-08-26 at 11:35 +0200, Vincent Torri wrote: >> On Tue, 25 Aug 2009, Danny Backx wrote: >>> On Sun, 2009-08-23 at 18:18 +0200, Vincent Torri wrote: in io.h, shouldn't struct _finddata_t be guarded by _FINDDATA_T_DEFINED (like _fsize_

Re: [Cegcc-devel] about definition of struct _finddata_t

2009-08-26 Thread Vincent Torri
On Tue, 25 Aug 2009, Danny Backx wrote: > On Sun, 2009-08-23 at 18:18 +0200, Vincent Torri wrote: >> Hey, >> >> in io.h, shouldn't struct _finddata_t be guarded by _FINDDATA_T_DEFINED >> (like _fsize_t is guarded by _FSIZE_T_DEFINED) ? >> >> Vincent Torri > > I guess so. Mingw doesn't appear to

Re: [Cegcc-devel] about definition of struct _finddata_t

2009-08-25 Thread Danny Backx
On Sun, 2009-08-23 at 18:18 +0200, Vincent Torri wrote: > Hey, > > in io.h, shouldn't struct _finddata_t be guarded by _FINDDATA_T_DEFINED > (like _fsize_t is guarded by _FSIZE_T_DEFINED) ? > > Vincent Torri I guess so. Mingw doesn't appear to have this though. Does this bother you or is it a c