My idea was to clean it up and propose it to the gcc folks.
Danny
On Thu, 2007-02-08 at 19:44 +, Pedro Alves wrote:
> It gives a me a bit the creeps to review gcc code, but looks good. Do
> you think this would make
> sense for other cross targets, and should be pushed upstream, or
Danny Backx escreveu:
> Pedro,
>
> Some time ago, you suggested I replaced the GCOV_CROSS_PREFIX
> environment variable approach by a gcc command line option.
>
> Here's a proposed patch for that. Documentation (for the gcc/doc
> directory) and ChangeLog are still missing. Also the old code is simp
