On Tue, Jun 30, 2015 at 12:44 PM, Robert Schwebel
wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 26, 2015 at 11:47:45AM -0300, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri wrote:
>> Not yet. We're using an internal one, github issues for the public. Is there
>> a
>> good free ML service you recommend?
>
> I don't think so. Let's stay here fo
On Tue, Jun 30, 2015 at 1:39 PM, Robert Schwebel
wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 30, 2015 at 01:30:04PM -0300, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri wrote:
>> > On Fri, Jun 26, 2015 at 11:47:45AM -0300, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri wrote:
>> > > Not yet. We're using an internal one, github issues for the public. Is
>> > > th
On Tue, Jun 30, 2015 at 1:31 PM, Robert Schwebel
wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 30, 2015 at 01:18:28PM -0300, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri wrote:
>> > ARGH!
>>
>> We're fixing it, we found problems within Yocto as well.
>>
>> The idea of moving to Kbuild is to make options interdependency easier
>> to track and
Hello all,
On Tue, 30 Jun 2015 17:44:54 +0200, Robert Schwebel wrote:
> All experience from packaging > 600 tools for ptxdist shows, that any
> package that tries to be smarter than autotools and invent their own
> build system didn't take care of many important things.
Similar experience as a B
On Tue, Jun 30, 2015 at 01:30:04PM -0300, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri wrote:
> > On Fri, Jun 26, 2015 at 11:47:45AM -0300, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri wrote:
> > > Not yet. We're using an internal one, github issues for the public. Is
> > > there a good free ML service you recommend?
> >
> > I don't thi
On Tue, Jun 30, 2015 at 01:18:28PM -0300, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri wrote:
> > ARGH!
>
> We're fixing it, we found problems within Yocto as well.
>
> The idea of moving to Kbuild is to make options interdependency easier
> to track and do, as well as allowing it to be extremely configurable
> for
On Tuesday, June 30, 2015, Robert Schwebel
wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 26, 2015 at 11:47:45AM -0300, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri wrote:
> > Not yet. We're using an internal one, github issues for the public. Is
> there a
> > good free ML service you recommend?
>
> I don't think so. Let's stay here for the
On Tuesday, June 30, 2015, Robert Schwebel
wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 30, 2015 at 05:44:54PM +0200, Robert Schwebel wrote:
> > Our first impression when we saw soletta was: wow, they did it right.
> > And now you are removing autotools and replace that by Kconfig. I don't
> > think that this is a good
On Tue, Jun 30, 2015 at 05:44:54PM +0200, Robert Schwebel wrote:
> Our first impression when we saw soletta was: wow, they did it right.
> And now you are removing autotools and replace that by Kconfig. I don't
> think that this is a good idea, especially when things make further
> progress and the
On Fri, Jun 26, 2015 at 11:47:45AM -0300, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri wrote:
> Not yet. We're using an internal one, github issues for the public. Is there a
> good free ML service you recommend?
I don't think so. Let's stay here for the moment :-)
Our first impression when we saw soletta was: wow,
Not yet. We're using an internal one, github issues for the public. Is
there a good free ML service you recommend?
Most projects I know use either sourceforge, kernel's or their privately
hosted. No idea what would be a best fit for this kind of project.
On Friday, June 26, 2015, Robert Schwebe
Hi Gustavo,
On Wed, Jun 17, 2015 at 02:15:23PM -0300, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri wrote:
> I'm very glad to announce our project is now published as open source!
>
> https://github.com/solettaproject/soletta
Is there already a mailing list for soletta?
rsc
--
Pengutronix e.K.
12 matches
Mail list logo
