[cellml-discussion] Errors building the C++ API

2007-08-19 Thread David Nickerson
Hi all, I know Andrew and I have discussed this in the past but just thought I'd raise the issue here and see if anyone has any ideas. I have just begun trying to build the C++ API implementation using the latest svn trunk code. I'm using a freshly installed Fedora 7 Linux box (gcc (GCC)

Re: [cellml-discussion] Errors building the C++ API

2007-08-19 Thread Bob Gustafson
Without looking at the code in question, my experience has been that standards in C++ templates have been (tightening, changing, evolving) and the newer versions of C++ are more picky. Probably a line or two change in a template somewhere in the CellML code would calm the compiler. Best

Re: [cellml-discussion] Errors building the C++ API

2007-08-19 Thread Andrew Miller
David Nickerson wrote: Hi all, I know Andrew and I have discussed this in the past but just thought I'd raise the issue here and see if anyone has any ideas. I have just begun trying to build the C++ API implementation using the latest svn trunk code. I'm using a freshly installed Fedora

Re: [cellml-discussion] Errors building the C++ API

2007-08-19 Thread Andrew Miller
David Nickerson wrote: Andrew Miller wrote: David Nickerson wrote: Hi all, I know Andrew and I have discussed this in the past but just thought I'd raise the issue here and see if anyone has any ideas. I have just begun trying to build the C++ API implementation using the

Re: [cellml-discussion] CeVAS, CUSES, MaLaES

2007-08-19 Thread David Nickerson
Thanks Andrew. So just to make sure I'm getting it right, in the trunk code CCGS is now a service sitting on top of CaVAS, MaLaES, etc., right? Andre. Andrew Miller wrote: David Nickerson wrote: Hi all, I have just done an update on my working copy of the CellML API C++ implementation

Re: [cellml-discussion] CeVAS, CUSES, MaLaES

2007-08-19 Thread Andrew Miller
David Nickerson wrote: Thanks Andrew. So just to make sure I'm getting it right, in the trunk code CCGS is now a service sitting on top of CaVAS, MaLaES, etc., right? Thats right, so you need to enable those services in configure in order to enable CCGS. Best regards, Andrew Andre.

Re: [cellml-discussion] CeVAS, CUSES, MaLaES

2007-08-19 Thread David Nickerson
Andrew Miller wrote: David Nickerson wrote: Thanks Andrew. So just to make sure I'm getting it right, in the trunk code CCGS is now a service sitting on top of CaVAS, MaLaES, etc., right? Thats right, so you need to enable those services in configure in order to enable CCGS. ok,

Re: [cellml-discussion] CeVAS, CUSES, MaLaES

2007-08-19 Thread Alan Garny
David Nickerson wrote: Andrew Miller wrote: David Nickerson wrote: Thanks Andrew. So just to make sure I'm getting it right, in the trunk code CCGS is now a service sitting on top of CaVAS, MaLaES, etc., right? Thats right, so you need to enable those services in configure in order

Re: [cellml-discussion] CeVAS, CUSES, MaLaES

2007-08-19 Thread Andrew Miller
Alan Garny wrote: David Nickerson wrote: Andrew Miller wrote: David Nickerson wrote: Thanks Andrew. So just to make sure I'm getting it right, in the trunk code CCGS is now a service sitting on top of CaVAS, MaLaES, etc., right? Thats right, so you need to

Re: [cellml-discussion] CeVAS, CUSES, MaLaES

2007-08-19 Thread David Nickerson
Andrew Miller wrote: Alan Garny wrote: David Nickerson wrote: Andrew Miller wrote: David Nickerson wrote: Thanks Andrew. So just to make sure I'm getting it right, in the trunk code CCGS is now a service sitting on top of CaVAS, MaLaES, etc., right? Thats