Re: [cellml-discussion] Representing the next version of the CellML Specification

2007-11-07 Thread Alan Garny
I don't know much (if anything!) about the solutions offered here, but: - the current HTML version is nice for viewing from a web browser, but if you have ever tried to print things out you will no doubt have noticed that it doesn't look great anymore. I remember that there used to be a 'proper'

Re: [cellml-discussion] Representing the next version of the CellML Specification

2007-11-07 Thread Randall Britten
, Randall -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:cellml-discussion- [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Alan Garny Sent: Wednesday, 7 November 2007 9:46 p.m. To: 'CellML Discussion List' Subject: Re: [cellml-discussion] Representing the next version of the CellML Specification I

Re: [cellml-discussion] Representing the next version of the CellML Specification

2007-11-07 Thread Matt
On 8/11/2007, at 10:27 AM, Randall Britten wrote: Hi all Another option to add to the mix: using a Wiki. In this case, I would specifically suggest MediaWiki (a la Wikipedia). Pros: -Widely used, lots of user familiarity. -Easy collaboration: edits done via web interface. -Built in

Re: [cellml-discussion] Representing the next version of the CellML Specification

2007-11-07 Thread Andrew Miller
Matt wrote: On 8/11/2007, at 10:27 AM, Randall Britten wrote: Hi all Another option to add to the mix: using a Wiki. In this case, I would specifically suggest MediaWiki (a la Wikipedia). Pros: -Widely used, lots of user familiarity. -Easy collaboration: edits done via web interface.

Re: [cellml-discussion] Representing the next version of the CellML Specification

2007-11-07 Thread Andrew Miller
-discussion] Representing the next version of the CellML Specification I don't know much (if anything!) about the solutions offered here, but: - the current HTML version is nice for viewing from a web browser, but if you have ever tried to print things out you will no doubt have noticed

Re: [cellml-discussion] Representing the next version of the CellML Specification

2007-11-06 Thread David Brooks
Hi Andrew, My vote is for DocBook - I used it a few years ago for a software manual without too many issues, and the tools have matured since then. Keep away from anything DSSSL based (including the DSSSL flavour of DocBook), otherwise we will create a dependency on needing a Lisp expert to

Re: [cellml-discussion] Representing the next version of the CellML Specification

2007-11-06 Thread Andrew Miller
Matt wrote: Without making a choice at the moment, I want to highlight that the following are probably the most important aspects to consider in any of these: 1) can represent MathML in either content or presentation format and can render MathML in the HTML output using image