Hi,

I have created a proposal 'best current practice' document for how 
external code can be included in CellML models. The proposal is located at:

   http://www.cellml.org/Members/miller/bcp-external-models/

for now, although I will probably move it to a non-Members URL if it 
gains wider acceptance.

I would welcome any general or specific comments on the proposal, and in 
particular, on the following issues:

  1) [For people who currently are looking for a way to make CellML and 
external code work together] Does the proposed mechanism provide an 
sufficient interface between the model and external code to allow your 
external code to be used in CellML?
  2) [For developers of CellML processing tools with simulation 
capabilities] Would the proposed mechanism allow you to support external 
code? Does it give too much control over the way the integrator runs to 
the model author?
  3) Do you agree with the basic premise of the proposal, that is that 
it is better to have a model which is partly expressed in CellML, than 
to have a model which is entirely expressed in a more general 
programming language?
  4) Do the best practice guidelines for CellML authors adequately 
protect the utility of CellML as a model interchange format?
  5) Does the proposed approach fit well with the design of CellML?

Thanks and Best regards,
Andrew Miller

_______________________________________________
cellml-discussion mailing list
cellml-discussion@cellml.org
http://www.cellml.org/mailman/listinfo/cellml-discussion

Reply via email to