Dear All
Three weeks ago I sent out an email soliciting feedback on the
proposed curation flags for the CellML model repository.
In the absence of any response I will assume that everyone is happy
with the initial proposal and Tommy and I will begin to work on the
realisation of these
My apologies - my original email was more exclusive to its recipients that to the discussion list!I will be happy to leave this another week to give anyone else a change to respond if they have comments.Best wishesCatherineBegin forwarded message:*From: *Catherine Lloyd c.ll...@auckland.ac.nz
My only comment is that lines 6 and 9 ('is it valid?' and 'is it
simulatable?') are the ones I'd be looking at/for the most, so if those
bit of the glyphs were emphasized or at least easy to pick out, that'd be
great.
-Lucian
* Catherine Lloyd c.ll...@auckland.ac.nz [2010-06-03 13:27] writes:
I have put the minutes from this week's meeting up at:
http://www.cellml.org/community/meeting/minutes/2010/06.02
Thanks,
Dougal
___
cellml-discussion mailing list
cellml-discussion@cellml.org
http://www.cellml.org/mailman/listinfo/cellml-discussion
* Catherine Lloyd c.ll...@auckland.ac.nz [2010-06-03 20:55] writes:
Hi Lucian
Adding to that, I'll emphasise again that this list forms the bare
minimum and we will be happy to expand on the list in the future.
validity and simulation could be two areas which we choose to
expand on
