Matt wrote:
> Sure. I replied to that earlier thread last night.
>   
I haven't seen your post on the list, so I guess it got lost somewhere 
(the mailman has been delaying my messages for rather random periods of 
time recently, so I am guessing there is some bottleneck that could also 
be timing out messages). It is not in the cellml-discussion archives 
either (the only recent post from you was the one about curation 
information).
> Perhaps we need some test-case examples.
>   
I wrote a simple units conversion test-case (at the connections) for 
mozCellML. These models really need a better home, as they are currently 
only in the mozCellML CVS (and mozCellML is no longer even being developed).

I put the early test models into the tool-test repository at 
http://www.cellml.org/examples/repository/tooltest/, but these haven't 
been updated since before we stopped using "WML". There is no similar 
functionality for the new CellML repository, unless we are going to put 
the models through the standard curation process (some of them 
deliberately do things wrong, including invalid XML, so they are 
particularly problematic).

Best regards,
Andrew

_______________________________________________
cellml-discussion mailing list
cellml-discussion@cellml.org
http://www.cellml.org/mailman/listinfo/cellml-discussion

Reply via email to