On 3/19/07, Andrew Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Matt wrote:
> > I have often thought referencing external code through a clearly
> > defined interface would be useful, and mostly because procedural code
> > is another natural way to solve problems. But I have always banged my
> > head up aga
Matt wrote:
> I have often thought referencing external code through a clearly
> defined interface would be useful, and mostly because procedural code
> is another natural way to solve problems. But I have always banged my
> head up against validation. With procedural code this amounts to
> passing
I have often thought referencing external code through a clearly
defined interface would be useful, and mostly because procedural code
is another natural way to solve problems. But I have always banged my
head up against validation. With procedural code this amounts to
passing tests - good tests -
David Nickerson wrote:
>> ECMAScript is not practical for use in modelling, because it is an
>> interpreted, non-typed language, which necessarily means that it cannot
>> be compiled and will be slower than compiled code.
>>
>
> But CellML is an language for the description and exchange of
> ECMAScript is not practical for use in modelling, because it is an
> interpreted, non-typed language, which necessarily means that it cannot
> be compiled and will be slower than compiled code.
But CellML is an language for the description and exchange of
mathematical models. It is not meant
