Re: [cellml-discussion] Representing the next version of the CellMLSpecification

2007-11-07 Thread David Nickerson
For the purpose of presentation math, LaTex substrings get my vote. the problem with LaTeX math is that it is quite unfamiliar to a lot of people, whereas most people involved in CellML probably have a reasonable grasp of at least content MathML if not presentation MathML also. The

Re: [cellml-discussion] Representing the next version of the CellMLSpecification

2007-11-07 Thread Matt
More generally, I think XML source formats should be avoided if possible. Just wondering if you can explain your reasoning for this? reading plain text in a text editor is more pleasant reading diffs of plain text is more pleasant ___

Re: [cellml-discussion] Representing the next version of the CellMLSpecification

2007-11-06 Thread David Nickerson
1) can represent MathML in either content or presentation format and can render MathML in the HTML output using image replacements instead of expecting that the browser can render MathML (content or presentation) is the use of image based equations still required? if people are using a