Andrew Miller wrote:
>>
> Have you actually looked at what exactly is happening? Is this an
> overflow where quantities are getting so big they go to infinity because
> you have a loop which doesn't have any self-regulation?
>
Hi Andrew,
Yes, I have looked at what's happening. In some cases
James Lawson wrote:
> Dear All,
>
> This email is aimed at anyone who has comments, but we particularly want
> to draw Matt's attention.
>
> In the CellML meeting yesterday I brought up the issue of replacement of
> reaction components with straight math. At present PCEnv isn't handling
> reaction
Hi,
First off ... "Horray for the demise of the reaction element". From
your description, the script of Andrew's pulls apart the components
and adds in the formerly implicit rate*stoichiometry as I would
expect, though I would like stoichiometry to be represented as an
explicit variable so we can
Dear All,
This email is aimed at anyone who has comments, but we particularly want
to draw Matt's attention.
In the CellML meeting yesterday I brought up the issue of replacement of
reaction components with straight math. At present PCEnv isn't handling
reaction components well - models which use
