[cellml-discussion] CellML-API user survey 2010-12

2011-02-01 Thread Dougal Cowan

Hi

This is another invitation to all current or potential CellML API users 
to participate in the CellML-API user survey, which will help us 
prioritise development and assess the processes used on the project. 
Even if you do not currently use the CellML-API, your feedback would be 
appreciated, so please take the time to participate.


The following link displays the participant information sheet, as per 
the ethics approval requirements:


http://tinyurl.com/cellmlsurvey201012

The link to the survey is at the bottom of the information sheet.

Cheers,
Dougal

___
cellml-discussion mailing list
cellml-discussion@cellml.org
http://lists.cellml.org/mailman/listinfo/cellml-discussion


[cellml-discussion] Unofficial draft CellML specification - backwards compatibility, type attributes on variables

2011-02-01 Thread Andrew Miller

Hi all,

I've just put up an unofficial draft CellML specification up at 
http://www.cellml.org/Members/miller/draft-normative-spec-andrews-preferred/toplevel.xhtml 
to prototype what some of the new features could look like.


This version has the following features:
  Backwards and forwards compatibility with CellML 1.1.
  A new attribute, type, on variables. It defaults to real, but can 
alternatively point to a URL defining the type (it is up to secondary 
specifications to define the meaning of URLs other than the one for real 
values defined in the specification).


The source for generating the specification and creating your own draft 
version is up at http://repo.or.cz/w/cellml-draft-miller.git - the 
andrews-preferred-version branch was used to generate the XHTML linked to.


Best wishes,
Andrew
___
cellml-discussion mailing list
cellml-discussion@cellml.org
http://lists.cellml.org/mailman/listinfo/cellml-discussion


Re: [cellml-discussion] Unofficial draft CellML specification - backwards compatibility, type attributes on variables

2011-02-01 Thread Lucian Smith
* Andrew Miller ak.mil...@auckland.ac.nz [2011-02-02 03:27] writes:
 Hi all,
 
 I've just put up an unofficial draft CellML specification up at 
 http://www.cellml.org/Members/miller/draft-normative-spec-andrews-preferred/toplevel.xhtml
  
 to prototype what some of the new features could look like.
 
 This version has the following features:
   Backwards and forwards compatibility with CellML 1.1.
   A new attribute, type, on variables. It defaults to real, but can 
 alternatively point to a URL defining the type (it is up to secondary 
 specifications to define the meaning of URLs other than the one for real 
 values defined in the specification).
 
 The source for generating the specification and creating your own draft 
 version is up at http://repo.or.cz/w/cellml-draft-miller.git - the 
 andrews-preferred-version branch was used to generate the XHTML linked to.

The section on MathML was a little vague--are *all* valid MathML 
constructs valid CellML constructs, or only a subset?

Also, I didn't see anything in there about events--are those being 
deferred again?

My only other suggestion is that eventually you'll want pictures in there 
;-)

-Lucian
___
cellml-discussion mailing list
cellml-discussion@cellml.org
http://lists.cellml.org/mailman/listinfo/cellml-discussion