I just think that because the current draft has been clearly marked as
a draft that it is not unreasonable to correct known deficiencies
prior to releasing the a final 1.0 specification. I'm also a bit wary
of setting a precedent of "finalising" a specification with known
problems...
Just to clarify to people here, the main issue is that the link to the
BQS spec is now out of date and broken. I doubt this will break anyone's
dependencies.
begin:vcard
fn:James Lawson
n:Lawson;James
org:Auckland Bioengineering Institute;CellML Model Repository Curator, CellML Team
adr:;;University of Auckland;;;;New Zealand
email;internet:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
title:James Lawson
url:http://www.cellml.org
version:2.1
end:vcard
_______________________________________________
cellml-discussion mailing list
cellml-discussion@cellml.org
http://www.cellml.org/mailman/listinfo/cellml-discussion
