Hi, Having just read the minutes of this week's CellML meeting, I would like to clarify the situation with regards to the TeLICeMS grammar...
I wrote the initial OpenCell's COR view more than a year ago. From there, Andrew (I wasn't involved in that decision) decided to implement the TeLICeMS service based on my code. So, yes, unless Andrew drastically changed the grammar I used for the then OpenCell's COR view, it should be very similar to the one used in TeLICeMs. However, I have nothing and had nothing to do with the current minus/negative solution. As it happens, I am against it (see https://tracker.physiomeproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2990). To me, it goes against what I was trying to do with OpenCell's COR view, i.e. make it as simple as possible for a user to edit a CellML file and leave it to the software to decide how to serialise a model in CellML. Alan > -----Original Message----- > From: cellml-discussion-boun...@cellml.org [mailto:cellml-discussion- > boun...@cellml.org] On Behalf Of Dougal Cowan > Sent: 12 August 2011 03:14 > To: CellML Discussion List > Subject: [cellml-discussion] ABI CellML Meeting Minutes, 10th August, 2011 > > I have put the minutes from this week's meeting up at: > > http://www.cellml.org/community/meeting/minutes/2011/08.10 > > Cheers, > Dougal > > _______________________________________________ > cellml-discussion mailing list > cellml-discussion@cellml.org > http://lists.cellml.org/mailman/listinfo/cellml-discussion _______________________________________________ cellml-discussion mailing list cellml-discussion@cellml.org http://lists.cellml.org/mailman/listinfo/cellml-discussion