Re: [cellml-discussion] CellML 1.2 and MathML 3

2012-06-12 Thread David Nickerson
Hi Andrew, Thanks for your input. I have a couple of comments that are relevant here. Firstly, as noted on tracker item 55 for CellML 1.2, the editorial board is just starting on the process of establishing what changes and additions will go into CellML 1.2. Please don't view the current state of

[cellml-discussion] CellML 1.2 and MathML 3

2012-06-12 Thread Andrew Miller
Hi, I'd like to suggest that using MathML 3 rather than MathML 2 be considered in the work to develop CellML 1.2; it is currently in the tracker as an item for future versions of CellML. I believe my proposal is well justified for the following reasons: 1. MathML 3 is more mathematically sou