Dear Andrew
I hope that I am interpreting the EBNF notation correctly (although
the expression seems to be BNF, not EBNF - although W3C seems to use
the BNF notation). Doesn't
identifier ::= ('_')* ( letter ) ( letter | '_' | digit )*
indicate that any number of '_' symbols may form the
.
Best wishes
Poul
On 2007 Dec 22, at 20:21, Jonathan Cooper wrote:
On Sat, Dec 22, 2007 at 11:19:52AM +1300, Poul Nielsen wrote:
I think that Jonathan is correct - the concept of 'in' and 'out'
does not make sense in a declarative description. One way to remedy
this would be to remove
I think that the best policy is to evolve CellML toward a clean and
simple specification. I don't think that this means that we require a
complete break with previous specifications at each major iteration
if, for example, we use deprecated/obsolescent flags. I believe that
it is
On 2008 Jan 09, at 14:49, Andrew Miller wrote:
Poul Nielsen wrote:
I think that the best policy is to evolve CellML toward a clean and
simple specification. I don't think that this means that we require a
complete break with previous specifications at each major iteration
if, for example
a stated period of time (typically 1 or 2 weeks).
• After this period the proposal is considered by a Specification
Proposals Panel for acceptance, rejection, or deferral by a majority
vote.
• The Specification Proposals Panel will initially consist of David
Nickerson, Alan Garny, Poul Nielsen
Dear Hans
Thank you for raising this. It s, in fact, one of the issues discussed
at the recent combined CellML SBGN-SBO BioPAX MIASE Workshop held this
April on Waiheke Island. There is a clear need to be able to specify
discontinuous processes and events, such as you have described.
Dear Lucian
Many thanks for your participation in the CellML workshop and subsequent
comments.
On 2010-02-27, at 08:43, Lucian Smith wrote:
Thanks to all of you who were at the workshop for letting me attend
remotely. I found it quite valuable, and hope you didn't mind me asking
you all
