Re: [cellml-discussion] Base normative CellML Specification for further work

2008-01-17 Thread Alan Garny
. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:cellml-discussion- [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Andrew Miller Sent: 16 January 2008 23:30 To: For those interested in contributing to the development of CellML. Subject: [cellml-discussion] Base normative CellML Specification for further work

Re: [cellml-discussion] Base normative CellML Specification for further work

2008-01-17 Thread Andrew Miller
-discussion- [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Alan Garny Sent: Thursday, 17 January 2008 10:52 p.m. To: 'CellML Discussion List' Subject: Re: [cellml-discussion] Base normative CellML Specification for further work Dear Andrew, I quite like the structure of your document. Just one thing though

[cellml-discussion] Base normative CellML Specification for further work

2008-01-16 Thread Andrew Miller
Hi all, I have recently been working on developing an unofficial 'base' normative CellML specification to provide something off which proposed changes can be based and merged into. The aim of this unofficial draft specification is to provide a minimalistic, and normative, specification of all