Thanks Erik,
I managed to fix the issue before receiving your email, but this clears
things up for me very concisely. I would venture to say that the reason
that so many CellML models in the CellML repository do not pass Jsim's
units checking is not because of CellML, or any tools used to
Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of James Lawson
Sent: Tuesday, 3 June 2008 11:07 a.m.
To: Erik B
Cc: cellml-discussion@cellml.org
Subject: Re: [cellml-discussion] unit conversion
Thanks Erik,
I managed to fix the issue before receiving your email
: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Peter Hunter
Sent: Tuesday, 3 June 2008 11:35 a.m.
To: CellML Discussion List
Subject: Re: [cellml-discussion] unit conversion
Hi Mike,
I agree - but there they are in the SI base unit list see
http://physics.nist.gov/cuu/Units/units.html
so
PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Peter Hunter
Sent: Tuesday, 3 June 2008 11:35 a.m.
To: CellML Discussion List
Subject: Re: [cellml-discussion] unit conversion
Hi Mike,
I agree - but there they are in the SI base unit list see
http://physics.nist.gov/cuu/Units/units.html
so probably 150 years too late
Oh, to clarify, I mean the statement
It doesn't really make sense to say nanodimensionless per
microdimensionless
DOES in fact make sense.Colloquially we say.. Etc etc.
From: Mike Cooling [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, 3 June 2008 1:42 p.m.
To: 'CellML Discussion List'
