Re: [cellml-discussion] CellML 1.1 to draft CellML 1.2 normative specification mapping

2008-02-21 Thread Alan Garny
Hi Andrew, > > - Section 2.6.1: you may want to be consistent in the way you refer > to > > attributes in general. Compare this section with Section 4.2.1 for > example. > > - Section 3.3: are we missing 3.3.b and 3.3.c (in > > http://www.cellml.org/Members/miller/mapping-1-1-to-draft- > 1.2/mappi

Re: [cellml-discussion] CellML 1.1 to draft CellML 1.2 normative specification mapping

2008-02-20 Thread Andrew Miller
Alan Garny wrote: > Hi Andrew, > > >> I have now defined a mapping between CellML 1.1 and one draft of CellML >> 1.2. I have put this up at: >> http://www.cellml.org/Members/miller/mapping-1-1-to-draft-1.2/mapping >> >> It currently has all the mappings from 1.1 to a particular 1.2 draft, >> alt

Re: [cellml-discussion] CellML 1.1 to draft CellML 1.2 normative specification mapping

2008-02-20 Thread Alan Garny
Hi Andrew, > I have now defined a mapping between CellML 1.1 and one draft of CellML > 1.2. I have put this up at: > http://www.cellml.org/Members/miller/mapping-1-1-to-draft-1.2/mapping > > It currently has all the mappings from 1.1 to a particular 1.2 draft, > although it may be missing some of

[cellml-discussion] CellML 1.1 to draft CellML 1.2 normative specification mapping

2008-02-12 Thread Andrew Miller
Hi all, I have now defined a mapping between CellML 1.1 and one draft of CellML 1.2. I have put this up at: http://www.cellml.org/Members/miller/mapping-1-1-to-draft-1.2/mapping It currently has all the mappings from 1.1 to a particular 1.2 draft, although it may be missing some of the reverse