Re: [cellml-discussion] CellML 1.1 to draft CellML 1.2 normative specification mapping

2008-02-21 Thread Alan Garny
Hi Andrew, - Section 2.6.1: you may want to be consistent in the way you refer to attributes in general. Compare this section with Section 4.2.1 for example. - Section 3.3: are we missing 3.3.b and 3.3.c (in http://www.cellml.org/Members/miller/mapping-1-1-to-draft- 1.2/mapping/toplev

Re: [cellml-discussion] CellML 1.1 to draft CellML 1.2 normative specification mapping

2008-02-20 Thread Alan Garny
Hi Andrew, I have now defined a mapping between CellML 1.1 and one draft of CellML 1.2. I have put this up at: http://www.cellml.org/Members/miller/mapping-1-1-to-draft-1.2/mapping It currently has all the mappings from 1.1 to a particular 1.2 draft, although it may be missing some of the

Re: [cellml-discussion] CellML 1.1 to draft CellML 1.2 normative specification mapping

2008-02-20 Thread Andrew Miller
Alan Garny wrote: Hi Andrew, I have now defined a mapping between CellML 1.1 and one draft of CellML 1.2. I have put this up at: http://www.cellml.org/Members/miller/mapping-1-1-to-draft-1.2/mapping It currently has all the mappings from 1.1 to a particular 1.2 draft, although it may

[cellml-discussion] CellML 1.1 to draft CellML 1.2 normative specification mapping

2008-02-12 Thread Andrew Miller
Hi all, I have now defined a mapping between CellML 1.1 and one draft of CellML 1.2. I have put this up at: http://www.cellml.org/Members/miller/mapping-1-1-to-draft-1.2/mapping It currently has all the mappings from 1.1 to a particular 1.2 draft, although it may be missing some of the reverse